The Internet is a fundamental human right, a United Nations report released on Friday proclaims — a statement that resonates all the more in the wake of the recent revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt and the ongoing uprisings and protests in the Middle East and North Africa. The Internet, and sites like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, played a huge role in helping protesters organize and spread information and also in spreading the word about what was going on around the world.
Says the UN report on the “promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression”:
The Special Rapporteur underscores the unique and transformative nature of the Internet not only to enable individuals to exercise their right to freedom of opinion and expression, but also a range of other human rights, and to promote the progress of society as a whole.”
On the very day of the UN’s announcement, two-thirds of the Internet access went out in Syria. It’s a move that suggests the government’s continuing efforts to clamp down months of protests by asserting its authority, often brutally — and yet Friday also saw some of the biggest protests yet, with 50,000 reportedly marching in the city of Hama.
When Egypt’s now-ousted president Hosni Mubarak cut off the Internet, there was international outcry. Mubarak and other former senior officials now face $34 million in fines for the Internet blackout, a harsh reminder to dictators that, if you cut off access, you will have to pay.
Indeed the UN report highlights the recent pro-democracy protests in the Arab world:
[T]he recent wave of demonstrations in countries across the Middle East and North African region has shown the key role that the Internet can play in mobilizing the population to call for justice, equality, accountability and better respect for human rights,” the report notes. “As such, facilitating access to the Internet for all individuals, with as little restriction to online content as possible, should be a priority for all States.
The Atlantic points out that some other countries, including Estonia, France and Costa Rica have already passed laws declaring Internet access a fundamental human right. Finland’s law even goes so far as to specify broadband speed:
In 2009, Finland, the report notes, “passed a decree … stating that every Internet connection needs to have a speed of at least one Megabit per second (broadband level).” There, should they need to, people will be able to organize even faster.
On a somewhat lighter note, it’s possible the UN’s resolution could cause parents a bit of a headache. Just wait till we hear reports of a teenager protesting Mom and Dad for deprivation of his “fundamental human right” because he’s been grounded by not being able to use the computer.
Read more: computers, egypt, facebook, freedom of expression, human rights, internet, libya, mideast conflict, regional conflict, syria, twitter, un, united nations, youtube
Image by Wilfried Huss / Anonymous [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Does no one play fair any more?
While John Boehner and the Republicans keep talking about jobs. They recently passed a bill to allow…
Who does the dickhead think he is? And is that even legal?!
52 comments
+ add your ownOops. Apologies for my typos... :-)
Scott F., I appreciate your comments and thoughtfulness very much, especially "evil loves to be evil and then blame it on good."
That said, unfortunately, the scripture in all the major religions do call for violence against non-believers, particularly in the Old Testament, which forms the basis of the three most popular religions worldwide. Taking that text literally is largely why there is politically-induced starvation, looting, land grabs, rape, the stealing of rights in general, "ordained" hatred against those outside one's believe and the slaying of masses of people across the globe.
Those in our own government who claim they are "pro-life" and love God are the first and most insistent that our unholy war in the Middle East continue. As someone raised Christian, I have always found the construct of a "devil" is a morally lazy explanation for ungodly behavior, and I don't buy it, frankly. Moreover, I have yet to meet a fundamentalist of any religion who does not espouse hatred when given the opportunity to point out why their way is the best. And this is a lifelong observation of mine. I don't condemn religion, but overall, it needs an overhaul.
More people will welcome this declaration. Is absurd, if any State which cut the use of the Internet because they live in the dark world of communication, cover himself with the outside world. It is a deprivation of principled thing to everyone and this violates the basic rights of every human being. United Nations as the supreme organization of World Human Rights decent fight for human rights in those countries. Shut down with the intention of the crime really silly.
For better or worse, this IS 'The Age of the Internet". The 'Facebook Factor' or social internet networking institutes that enables a free media in nations in the mid-east that never had it before, is facilitating all these revolutions. On the lighter side, the 'Facebook Factor' might be the death knell of Al Quaida and related terrorist organizations, since they have always been about absolute control over the peasants, and now finally, for the first time in history, the sheep are looking up!
Every student should have access to an internet.
Congradulations Tom!
You have won a copy of the thinking human award!
Original Message:
-----------------
Hello,
Tom left a comment on the following article:
UN Declares Internet a "Fundamental Human Right"
We need to remember what rights genuinely are: the core recognition of natural value and respect for dignity that must be extended to every human person, on the grounds that each person is indeed a human being! The UN lost sight of this elementary truth long ago, which is why it can make such a ridiculous proclamation. It might as well declare a "fundamental right" to cell phone ownership and drivers' licenses. Since the Islamist regimes countered by the "Arab Spring" don't bother with recognizing the dignity of any of its citizens, it's doubtful a UN proclamation will suddenly sway them to provide universal Internet access! The dictators will just laugh, knowing the only way the UN would act against them is if they suddenly became Israelis...
Of; "free, fed, healthy and educated", only one of them qualifies as a fundamental right!
Original Message:
-----------------
Hello,
Jan left a comment on the following article:
UN Declares Internet a "Fundamental Human Right"
The internet is a wonderful tool that people should be able to use without restrictions, but its a long way from a fundamental human right. Once everyone is free, fed, healthy and educated, then Ill worry about their internet access.
Thanks, I totally agree!
thanks for sharing.
Glen are you so desperate to show your irreligious impulse that it cannot wait to post on a thread that it is more appropriate? I apologise to those who wish to stay on topic but I cannot let this go unanswered;
Islam is steadily increasing in its following. It appears to be the only one growing but Christianity and Judaism are not in rapid decline; they are fairly stable presently.
Do not judge a faith by the worst of people who falsely claim it is theirs. Look to the role models of that faith and its Teachings before you cast aspersions.
Evil loves to be evil and then blame it on good. It is its nature to lie and deceive; especially when the blame and punishments for its crimes are severe. Evil is against religion because God and His Prophets (peace be upon them and their families) all teach us to be free of evils grasp and to reject it in favour of love, mercy and peace.
So to blame religion for terrorism is an obvious ploy by Lucifer and his slaves to promote the evil acts while slandering and dissuading people to take refuge from evil and enjoy shelter with God and His Teachings.
If the Holy Quran says that we should harm innocent people by initiating violence or force people to convert then you might have a point. But it does not and in fact, it clearly states the opposite many times as well as perfectly explaining the meaning of life and the principles we should live by for a successful life.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment
20