START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
4,428,425 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Update: Canada Approves Plans to Ship Radioactive Waste Through the Great Lakes

Update: Canada Approves Plans to Ship Radioactive Waste Through the Great Lakes

Bruce Power has been approved to ship 16 100-ton nuclear generators from its peninsula on Lake Huron through Lake Erie, Lake Ontario, down the St. Lawrence River and across the Atlantic to a company called Studsvik in Sweden for recycling into consumer goods. 

Hundreds of people along this route had raised opposition to the approval as Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) hearings proceeded into the winter.

“It’s pretty scary stuff,” Tom Fuhrman, president of the Lake Erie Region Conservancy, said. “It would seem that we should be competent to move some old boilers but what if?”

The old generators will be recycled into scrap metal market for unrestricted public use when they reach Sweden.

“We always believed this was the right thing to do to reduce our environmental footprint and we are pleased the soundness of our case has been verified by the CNSC,” Bruce Power President Duncan Hawthorne said in a news release.

The company said the generators are considered low-level radioactive waste.

Despite the massive warnings from politicians, environmentalists and a worried public, a CNSC press release said it was “satisfied that the risk to the health and safety of the public and the environment posed by the proposed activity is negligible.”

Fuhrman, who once worked for company that shipped a large boiler to southern Texas, said the risk of an accident is very real.  The steel boiler traveled down the Ohio River to the Mississippi River to sink in the Gulf of Mexico.

A coalition of mayors from Ontario, Quebec and eight U.S. states united as the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative expressed disappointment in not being listened to. Its analysis revealed that a spill from the radioactive material in the Great Lakes area could exceed federal standards for fresh drinking water, an indicator that would affect all the life dependent on the water.

The St. Lawrence River is a border between Canada and the U.S. and the water is under the jurisdiction of both countries. Bruce Power will now need to obtain a permit from U.S. authorities, who could still require additional conditions or choose not to approve the plan.

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) will be responsible for overseeing the transport. According to PHMSA Director Cynthia Quarterman, they will be consulting with the U.S. Coastguard and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission before exempting Bruce Power from safety regulations.

Watchdog groups are still worried about the precedent this will set in terms of risky procedures that could be disasterous to people and the environment.

“We believe the proposed shipment manifests as yet unquantified threats to water, the environment and public health in the event of a seal rupture on the generators,” said Terry Lodge, an attorney working with some of the groups.

“Radionuclides could enter the Lakes and Seaway, and if so, fisheries and resort activities will be seen as contaminated.”

He also noted that Bruce Power’s proposal did not include an emergency response plans, cleanup plans, protocols for spill remediation or measures to protect drinking water.

Sign the Petition

Sign the petition urging authorities to prohibit the shipment of nuclear waste through the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River. 

For more information about concerns over the shipment and the use of radioactive materials in consumer goods, read the previous post Criticism Surrounds Plans to Ship Radioactive Waste through Great Lakes for Recycling into Consumer Goods.


Related Stories: 

Water is Life: Mother Earth Water Walk 2011

What’s in Your Water? Nuclear Waste, Coal Slurries and Industrial Estrogen

123 Tons of Nuclear Waste Enter Germany



Read more: , , , , , , , , ,

creative commons

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
3:33PM PDT on Mar 24, 2011

I am Canadian and cannot believe that the government have given the go ahead in shipping these Nuclear Generators. I signed every petition I could find. This is just so dangerous and the fact that they haven't listened to the indigenous people infuriates me. I have never agreed to the seal hunt, and every year I sign petitions against it.
"It is the power of capital that builds and destroys things of beauty." Caetano Veloso

9:56AM PST on Mar 1, 2011

I can only hope that the U.S. does not approve this plan. As we saw in the Gulf, "accidents WILL happen." A radioactive Great Lake (s) would be lovely ... for how many years? And let's not forget about crossing the Atlantic Ocean.

10:07AM PST on Feb 28, 2011

Damn Canadians. Seal hunts, water pollution, and they're supposed to be better than us.

5:49AM PST on Feb 28, 2011

Keep Canada clean!

4:55AM PST on Feb 28, 2011

Canada is going backwards in many things, sadly. It's a shame.

12:25AM PST on Feb 28, 2011

What's going on with Canada these days?

11:05AM PST on Feb 26, 2011

another intelligent decision made by Idiots Huh..

7:38AM PST on Feb 26, 2011

When are people going to understand that whatever ANY government wants, they will do it regardless of how the people feel?!! I'm Canadian and don't support nuclear energy which supplies 50% of my province's energy.

I certainly do not support the seal hunt, either; never ate seal in all of my life like most Canadians. The seal hunt is all about a closed door deal my Canadian government made with the Chinese. Do you realise how much pull the Chinese have here in North America? Our government has never asked the Canadian people for our input or how we feel. That's because they don't give a damn about us!!

IT'S ALL ABOUT BIG CORPORATIONS AND BIG MONEY THAT CONTROL OUR GOVERNMENTS LIKE PUPPETS. It's sad, disheartening and shameful for all of us. What a mess we're leaving our children in...

4:35AM PST on Feb 26, 2011

Why can't they just put them on a C-41 transport plane and fly them to Sweden? Doesn't this mean that they will be crossing the Atlantic as well to get to Sweden? That could be dangerous too. Perhaps they could just recycle them in Canada. It seems like there are many alternatives to this plan. Finally, we shouldn't let Canada do anything here in America while they are clubbing those poor, innocent seal cubs to death to export to China or Japan or where ever.

9:35AM PST on Feb 25, 2011

What are these people thinking?

Oh, wait -- apparently they're not ...

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

In Argentina many years ago that the consumer must pay for plastic bags. Is something. But I do not think…

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!