Waking the Sleeping Giant: Call on the U.S. to Lead the Charge to Certify Congo’s Conflict Minerals


Written by John Bradshaw, Executive Director of the ENOUGH Project

Under Secretary of State, Robert Hormats, recently said the issue of conflict minerals in the Congo is “one of the greatest moral issues of our time … and one that requires bold, resolute, and moral action by the U.S.”  As citizens and consumers we have never been closer to helping reduce violence in eastern Congo. Now we need the Obama Administration to be a leader in the final charge.

The growing movement to push governments and industry towards monitoring and certifying the conflict mineral trade in  Congo — a trade responsible for immeasurable violence and destruction in the region — has made remarkable progress over the past year, and is poised to have significant impact on conflict affected communities on the ground.  Through the tracing, auditing, and certification of conflict minerals, the international community can make a difference in creating peace and economic development in Congo, while at the same time cutting off funding to illegal armed groups responsible for some of the most heinous human rights abuses of our generation.

In the US, consumers and Congress  have done their part through the creation and passage of legislation demanding that companies using conflict minerals trace and report whether their supply chains contribute to conflict in the region — similar efforts are now springing up in Canada, Australia, and the European Union. The electronics industry has taken steps to begin the auditing of mineral processing facilities around the world to determine whether these facilities, responsible for processing the materials that end up as chips and solder in our electronics, source from conflict areas or support armed groups.  The last piece needed is a credible certification scheme that monitors mineral traffic in the region from mine of origin to point of export.  For this step, U.S. leadership from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is essential — and to this point unfortunately absent.

The good news is the beginnings of a certification scheme do exist. A framework has been developed by the eleven countries of the International Conference of the Great Lakes Region, or ICGLR, and although promising in design, it remains unimplemented and controlled solely by the governments that have been beneficiaries of the conflict mineral trade. A true certification process must include input from beyond the walls of government. Industry, international NGOs, and local civil society must play a part in developing and monitoring the process.  Transparency, credibility, and accountability must form the foundation of any process and the U.S. has the tools to ensure these elements are present.

Regional governments, industry, and other international stakeholders have publicly agreed that this type of multi-stakeholder input is needed and are open to partnership with the U.S. What’s missing is a “conductor,” or leader with the necessary gravitas to bring stakeholders to the table and ensure all parties move forward in good faith.  The U.S. government, led by Secretary Clinton, can play this role given the diplomatic and economic toolbox it brings to the table. But moreover, the U.S. should play this role, as the passage of the conflict minerals provision in the Dodd-Frank Act has been the driving force for progress on mineral certification to this point.

The United States, as home to the largest end-user companies of conflict minerals and as a powerful diplomatic actor in Africa’s Great Lakes region, has a choice:  Either exercise leadership and help transform the current process on conflict minerals into real certification or step back and let the vested interests continue to develop systems that lack checks and balances. The administration should use its convening power, diplomatic influence, and sanctioning power to strengthen current regional certification plans, harmonize industry efforts and ensure credible monitoring on the ground.

The Obama Administration should act on the words of Under Secretary Hormats and work to convene a high-level partnership on conflict mineral certification with leading electronics and end-user companies, together with the government of Congo, and other regional governments, aimed at unifying the regional- and industry-led initiatives and gaining consensus on an internationally accepted system.  Join us in calling on Secretary Clinton to lead the U.S. government in becoming the “conductor” that delivers an international certification system on conflict minerals and ensures our electronic devices are not financing war and rape in Congo.

Related Stories:

Three Things to Know About Rape in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

Apple & Intel Pledge To Stop Using Conflict Minerals

Smartphones: The New Blood Diamonds?

Photo from the ENOUGH Project via flickr


Love This? Never Miss Another Story.


Martha Eberle
Martha Eberle4 years ago

The U.S. should be forcefully leading the way since, as a developed nation, our people use these minerals more than any other in our devices.

KrassiAWAY B.
Krasimira B.4 years ago


Abbe A.
Azaima A.4 years ago

Hoping for the best possible resolution for the people and their environment.

Ameer T.
Ameer T.4 years ago

Like the People of IRAQ invited America to rid of the dictatorship invitation? or should the Congo invite America to rid them like the way Afghanistan invited America to rid them of Osama? All those poor people got was a mouthful of bombs and lost their families.

Make no mistake about it. the intervention in Iraq was about Oil, the intervention in Afghanistan was about building the Gas pipeline and Libya is about protecting Israel. It has nothing to do with justice or freedom or oppression.

The cause is always portrayed as just and needful. thats the rationale for you to get behind the government with your tax money and Support the "Just" cause. But hasn't America realised yet that it cannot be the policman of the world? Whats the matter, Arab Oil wasn't enough for the American appetite now it wants Congo diamonds?

joanna e.
joanna e.4 years ago

Read The Mission Song by John Le Carre..you will understand why this is so important.
Great Job reporting this problem. We are so linked internationally that ignoring financial dealings is not workable.

alicia m.
alicia m.4 years ago

another petition, please sign:



alicia m.
alicia m.4 years ago

please visit



alicia m.
alicia m.4 years ago

signed, gracias

Zen Whisperingtree
Past Member 4 years ago

What a ridiculous comment, Marie. Obviously there will be local input, as the article makes clear. But as the main end-user of these minerals, the US is being asked, in this article, to be the driving force to help regulate the whole process.

Marie W.
Marie W.4 years ago

Actually how about Africa doing something for itself..?