START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,351,965 people care about Politics

Want a Judge That Votes Pro Women? Make Sure They Have a Daughter

Want a Judge That Votes Pro Women? Make Sure They Have a Daughter

We regularly hear of abuses to women’s rights in the courtroom, whether it’s related to employment issues or sexual assault. Yet some judges are staunchly pro-women, ruling in support of most of the women’s rights cases that come before them.

According to a new study, this tendency might actually have to do with their children, or more specifically, their daughters. Maya Sen, a political scientist at the University of Rochester, and Adam Glynn, a government professor at Harvard, authors of the study, found that judges with daughters are more likely to vote in favor of women’s rights than those judges with only sons.

In the study abstract, Sen and Glynn write, “This result survives a number of robustness tests and appears to be driven primarily by Republican judges. More broadly, this result demonstrates that personal experiences influence how judges make decisions, and it is the first paper to show that empathy may indeed be a component in how judges decide cases.”

It doesn’t take more than one daughter to make the influence, and that influence is very significant when comparing one-child families.

“Having one daughter as opposed to one son is linked to an even higher 16 percent increase in the proportion of gender-related cases decided in a feminist direction,” said the study.

Apparently this effect isn’t reserved for just judges. “Researchers have found similar ‘daughter effects’ in other areas. Members of Congress with daughters are more likely to cast liberal votes, particularly on abortion rights,†one study found.†Another study showed that British parents with daughters were more likely to vote for left-wing parties, while ones with sons were more likely to vote for right-wing parties,” wrote the New York Times.

When it comes to judges, there’s certainly a gender bias, simply in terms of the people holding judge positions; only 32 percent of active United States district (or trial) court judges are women.

The study also found that this “daughter effect” doesn’t go for all cases across the board, as the†voting trends showed up in only civil cases, for example in employment discrimination as opposed to criminal cases including rape and sexual assault, where the voting trends did not appear.

Professor Sen reminds us that it’s not just because the judges have daughters. It’s because judges are emotional human beings, not robots.

“Justices and judges arenít machines,” Sen told the New York Times. “They are human, just like you and me. And just like you and me, they have personal experiences that affect how they view the world.”

That means that more studies could be done on what exactly sways a judge’s decision, be it experience with a child, or something entirely different like serving in the military.

For now, if you’re a woman in the courtroom, better hope the judge has a daughter.

Read more: , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: Chris Potter

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

58 comments

+ add your own
8:14PM PDT on Jun 24, 2014

noted

2:30AM PDT on Jun 24, 2014

Thanks for the article.

4:43PM PDT on Jun 23, 2014

Thanks for the article.

9:23PM PDT on Jun 22, 2014

After reading this article, there is but one conclusion to make; we have far too many lunatics in the court that believe that women are inferior.

To all you insane Teaparty women, you are being used. There is nothing worse than being used, especially, when you are not bright enough to know that you that you are being used.

Your racism is your deepest problem.

11:28AM PDT on Jun 22, 2014

Way to continue to promote groupthink Care2!

2:32AM PDT on Jun 22, 2014

noted

1:38AM PDT on Jun 22, 2014

Unfortunately the SCOTUS is very biased as the majority have been bought by GOP &
monstersanto.

11:11PM PDT on Jun 21, 2014

Well, I guess Dick Cheney should have been a judge then instead of a politician, huh? Just kidding, of course. This piece of work would be the personification of pure evil regardless of what profession he chose. And for that matter, just look at Liz Cheney. Ugh.

8:21PM PDT on Jun 21, 2014

Barbara L., there is actually a definition for affluenza:

Af-flu-en-za n. 1. The bloated, sluggish and unfulfilled feeling that results from efforts to keep up with the Joneses. 2. An epidemic of stress, overwork, waste and indebtedness caused by dogged pursuit of the American Dream. 3. An unsustainable addiction to economic growth.

The Huffington Post reports that only 1% of the world is in danger of contracting it. ;P

6:48PM PDT on Jun 21, 2014

Thanks

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

PETROPOLIS : now you can help the sanctuary that is home to farm animals, victims of exploitation, of…

People assume that it's a belief in god that makes people behave. But of course that's nonsense. "Religious"…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.