START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,975,211 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Climate Deniers Set to Freeze Progress in Congress

Climate Deniers Set to Freeze Progress in Congress

A chill is coming to Washington. A wave of climate change deniers were elected to office this week, and come January, we can expect a freeze in all reasonable and productive discussion about the fate of the planet.

Last year, the political discussion about climate change and carbon regulation was complicated and bogged down, but at least it was happening.

Who are the deniers?

Grist has pulled together a list of the climate deniers headed into power in the Senate. “Overall, the Senate next year will be more hostile to climate action than ever before,” the site’s staff says.

If these climate-denying legislators came from deeply red states, Tuesday’s results might not be so shocking. But many of them represent swing states, or states that might be red in presidential contests, but that have previously elected Democrats to Congress.

Farewell, moderation

These latter states include North Dakota, whose new senator, John Hoeven, made Grist’s list, and Indiana. Also on the list are Marco Rubio, from Florida, Kelly Ayotte, from New Hampshire, and Pat Toomey, from Pennsylvania.

Perhaps most disheartening is the replacement of Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) with Senator-Elect Ron Johnson. Johnson is to the right of the independent-minded Feingold on a host of issues, but as Mother Jones’ Andy Kroll writes, “What landed Johnson in headlines earlier this year was his claim that climate change wasn’t created by humans but instead was the result of ‘sunspot activity.’

The new climate “science”

Sunspot activity is just one explanation that newly elected Republicans have grabbed onto to explain the very real phenomenon of climate change. Care2′s Beth Buczynski has rounded up a few choice quotes from these new leaders:

“With the possible exception of Tiger Woods, nothing has had a worse year than global warming. We have discovered that a good portion of the science used to justify “climate change” was a hoax perpetrated by leftist ideologues with an agenda.” —Todd Young, new congressperson from Indiana

“There isn’t any real science to say we are altering the climate path of the earth.” — Roy Blunt, new senator from Missouri

There are more where these came from.

In denial

What does this shift mean? In short, that the United States and our environmental policies will be limping forward and falling behind the rest of the world as international communities try to deal with climate change. As Brian Merchant writes at AlterNet:

…the current crop of GOP politicians have adopted a somewhat united ideological front opposing not only climate legislation, but the general notion of climate science itself. Nowhere else in the world has a leading political party availed itself of a position so directly in opposition to science — indeed, today’s GOP is the only party in the world that incorporates climate change denial as part of its political platform.

On the domestic front, writes The Washington Independent’s Andrew Restuccia, that means that even unambitious legislation, like the renewable energy standard, stands little chance of passing. As it’s currently written, the renewable energy standard would require a certain percentage of the country’s electricity to come from renewable sources. In reality, it would not even push clean energy production to grow faster than market forces alone would. The main purpose of passing a standard would be to signal to clean energy investors that the government supports their work.

In other words, in the current legislative climate, our leaders wouldn’t even get behind legislation that is just a sign of support for clean energy and the jobs it would create.

Zombie Climategate

Instead, the House’s leadership plans on spending its time staging a show trial of climate science. The chief executor of this strategy will be Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), who is set to become chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.’s Jess Leber explains:

From his new position, the former car-alarm company owner plans to raise false alarm about climate conspiracy theories. As Nikki Gloudeman wrote, just a few weeks ago Issa vowed to make investigating “Climategate” — the climate pseudo-scandal that’s already died 1,000 deaths — a top oversight priority should he win the committee.

In theory, Issa would be investigating a series of emails, sent by British climate scientists. Climate skeptics argue the emails prove that scientists are falsifying evidence of climate change. Extensive investigations have already debunked those claims.

In short, environmental leader Bill McKibben had the right idea back in September. Anyone who’s interested in advocating for climate change action in this country would do well to stop trying to convince Congress to do its job. Our leaders won’t be listening.

The best path forward may be to start convincing the American people, in the hope that, two years from now, they’ll vote for candidates who have a clue.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about the environment by members of The Media Consortium. It is free to reprint. 

Read more: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

photo credit: thanks to psd via flickr
by Sarah Laskow, Media Consortium blogger

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
3:37AM PST on Dec 4, 2010

Noted and signed!!

10:36PM PST on Dec 3, 2010

This reminds me of the economists on the payroll of banks, property developers, etc., who claimed the markets would self-regulate and achieve a 'soft landing' in 2008!

10:21AM PST on Nov 20, 2010

Not that there was all that much progress to begin with. :(

12:34AM PST on Nov 17, 2010


11:28AM PST on Nov 12, 2010

Freeze Progress? what progress?

8:05AM PST on Nov 12, 2010

"Is it time to say we're doomed?"

That has been said many times before!!

11:52PM PST on Nov 11, 2010

Is it time to say we're doomed?

11:24PM PST on Nov 11, 2010

Warming is a disaster.

But is not just warming. It is a major climate shift. That means weather patterns change, rain patterns change -- the temperature in the Canadian Shield area maybe become better for wheat growing but they don't have the soil for crop production. In my area if the snow does not pile up in the mountains we may have no water because it does not rain in summer.

The ocean is acidifying and things that form the basis of the food chain may die out. Although some plants so well with high Co2 (poison ivy for one) some do considerably less well.

Our societies are designed around permanent settlements, changing climate and sea levels mean that our settlements are in the wrong place.

3:56PM PST on Nov 9, 2010

Noted thnax :-)

8:38AM PST on Nov 9, 2010

Grace A is absolutely correct. We should get ready for a big hike in oil prices within the next eighteen months, according to Jeff Rubin. The transition to clean renewable energy is inevitable, regardless of climate change. because the cost of getting the dirty stuff out, is going to escalate

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

When I "clicked" add a comment, I somehow lost the first part of my comments, which was long. So, I…

... and this is how advances and research are done... WITHOUT LAB RATS, or MONKEYS, or RABBITS, or D…

“We have a majority in the U.S. Senate, where we’ll move those 300 bills off Harry Reid’s…

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.