START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
3,512,046 people care about Animal Welfare

West Hollywood Has Banned Fur Sales, and Federal Judge Supports It

West Hollywood Has Banned Fur Sales, and Federal Judge Supports It

If you walk into one of West Hollywood’s chichi boutiques, you’ll find the latest in designer fashion and elegance, but one thing you won’t find is fur, thanks to the city’s 2011 fur ban, which went into effect last year.

It’s all in a day’s work for a city that’s already famous for putting the interests of animals first with groundbreaking ordinances banning declawing and dogs and cats, and where “guardian” is used in the city code to refer to the the people responsible for the care, housing and feeding of animals. The fur ban has been highly controversial, with many retailers protesting that it cuts into their bottom line or imposes unfair restrictions on business, but the federal court doesn’t seem to think so.

West Hollywood officials recognize that banning fur sales doesn’t stop residents and visitors alike from crossing the border to neighboring cities to buy fur, but their legislation was intended as a sharp comment on the fur industry and animal welfare. While the city is considered a fashion capital, it also takes social responsibility seriously — West Hollywood is known for having highly socially active residents, progressive legislation and an environment that encourages the defense of marginalized communities. The community’s love for animals is also well-documented.

“According to the World Society for the Protection of Animals, it is estimated that fur farms produce eight-five percent of fur in the world. Every year, an estimated sixty million mink and six and one-half million foxes are killed on fur farms alone. If rabbits are included, the number of animals killed every year solely for their fur may far exceed one billion,” the City Council wrote in its 2011 ordinance, going on to note that there are numerous fur-free alternatives. After passing the ban, it gave retailers two years to get in compliance, but some felt this wasn’t enough.

That’s what landed the city in court, when West Hollywood retailer Mayfair House attempted to sue on Constitutional grounds, claiming the ban was a rights violation. Judge George H. King, however, disagreed, dismissing the case and upholding the fur ban. The judge did not recognize the arguments made by the retailer, and didn’t feel that promoting West Hollywood’s mission as a cruelty-free zone went against the rights of companies doing business in the region. His decision sent a clear message to other cities considering such bans, as well as animal welfare advocates interested in getting fur off the market.

After all, companies can always relocate if they feel that strongly about selling a notoriously cruel animal product. Just as customers have the right to vote with their wallets, companies have the right to decide where they want to do business — and so far, it doesn’t look like West Hollywood is losing sleep over the handful of businesses who have relocated rather than stop carrying fur.

Hopefully the city will take the logical next step and ban all fur sales — right now, fur in wearable goods cannot be sold in West Hollywood, but fur in home goods like rugs is still perfectly legal.


Photo credit: relux.

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
11:11AM PDT on Aug 31, 2014

It's a start...

10:01PM PDT on Jun 2, 2014

I look at this as a big step since people are always looking and ogling and trying to mimick what the "stars" are doing and wearing. People seeing that Hollywood no longer accepts the practice, well, maybe it can have farther reaching results. I can hope anyway.

12:43PM PDT on May 21, 2014

Fur is for ignorant, rich idiots!!!

12:15PM PDT on May 21, 2014


4:33AM PDT on May 21, 2014

well done, one down a million more to go!
never give up the fight!

8:27AM PDT on May 20, 2014

Thanks for the post.

5:43AM PDT on May 20, 2014

Wow West Hollywood get's one right! I'm so surprised.

2:49AM PDT on May 20, 2014

I am heartened by this. It sends a message and is a small but very welcome step on the road to treating animals well.

3:37PM PDT on May 19, 2014

Hooray for that judge! Baby steps, but according to the number of animals killed annually by the cruel fur industry, it doesn't look like we're making much progress on this ~ and we've been fighting this for DECADES!!!

1:50PM PDT on May 19, 2014

Well done. There is absolutely no need for anyone to wear fur these days.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Another goddamned GOPster who needs to spend six months trying to live on minimum wage without handouts…

although I strongly believe that we need a well-equipped and well-trained police, there is one thing…

Seems to me that there should be a picture of the police who killed this black man and not a picture…

ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK


Civil Rights


Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights


Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.