START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
2,030,217 people care about Politics

What If They Threw a Candidate Debate on Foreign Policy?

What If They Threw a Candidate Debate on Foreign Policy?
  • 1 of 2

If nothing else, devoting an entire GOP campaign forum to national security and foreign policy — the CBS News / National Journal organizers called it the “Commander in Chief Debate — helps accentuate the preparation and seriousness the candidates have devoted to international affairs. Or the lack thereof, since some candidates appeared utterly unserious and unprepared.

First, a quick best and worst. It was no contest for best: Jon Huntsman. Gov. Huntsman’s quotient of substance to platitudes / cheap applause lines was way above everyone else. Of course, foreign policy seriousness is a pillar of his candidacy (bless him). And of course his poll numbers have been stuck in the basement. If there are any centrist Republicans among our readers, this man is trying to rescue you from the fire-breathers. (BTW, another very interesting moment was Rick Santorum’s answers on Pakistan, where he seemed to employ the same strategy as Huntsman.) Worst was also an easy call: Herman Cain. The man said almost nothing of substance tonight — and “almost” might be too generous.  He keeps reaching for the same line about how presidents have plenty of advisers and don’t really have to know anything.  ”Herman Cain, the candidate who will make up for his ignorance by seeking a lot of advice.”  Don’t know if that’s going to work. At one point, Cain tossed in the word strategically a couple of times because, you know, that sounds commander-in-chiefish.

Hitting the issues

To the extent that issues were debated (not all that much), the most interesting were Iran and China, which my fellow Democracy Arsenal bloggers wrote about.  On Iran, Kelsey Hartigan explains that every idea raised by the candidates either is already an element of President Obama’s policy of pressuring Iran over its nuclear program (particularly amusing were all the loud calls for covert action), or would have disastrous unintended consequences. When the debate moderator posed the Iran question, he specifically asked the candidates to name steps the Obama administration wasn’t already taking. The moderators (bless them) made a game effort throughout the proceedings to spur the candidates to speak in practical terms.

  • 1 of 2

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Pool Photo by the Associated Press

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it


+ add your own
7:33PM PST on Nov 15, 2011

Will R. Excellent comments. All these clowns are rich with millions in the bank, and could care less about cutting social security and medicare, for the vast majority of Americans who need it, or will need it. They do represent an imperial ruling class that does not care or represent the values of most Americans. It's a shame that this crop of horrible candidates is all the republicans have to offer.

Louis N. Good point. Ron Paul is the only sane candidate who has intelligence, and wants to end our military involvement overseas, close our overseas bases, and stop being the world's policeman. Ron Paul also wants to legalize mariuanna. The thing I don't like about Ron Paul is his position on abortion, his desire to eliminate the EPA, medicare and social security, when he is a millionare himself and will never need social security or medicare. That is why I could never vote for Ron Paul or any republicans. But the republicans will never give him a chance anyway.

6:33PM PST on Nov 15, 2011

Hi Everyone,

The RNC has been complicit in the marginalization of Dr. Paul, as well as the media blackout. We all know this. I have set up a little website to bring attention to this fact and to help Dr. Paul. It is not the kind of thing he would do (in fact he couldn't even acknowledge it without being summarily expelled from the GOP), but it IS the kind of thing I would do, ESPECIALLY after the last debate where Dr. Paul got a whole 90 seconds to speak. This must stop and by God it WILL stop, and YOU'RE going to help me stop it!

Go to and sign up please, and spread the word. I set up the site myself it has no ads and no profit, just a labor of love in defense of Dr. Paul.

1:39PM PST on Nov 15, 2011

I think that it would be "fun" to have large map of the world (sans identifying titles and have some of these genius,s identify the location of the countries mentioned. and discuss the ramifications of certain actions.
For Herman Caine May I suggest either Libya or Uzbekistan (whilst explaining the value of such countries.) Although I think Miami or New York might be a stretch.
For Bachmann. China and the wisdom of chairman Mao,
For Romney ,any or all of the countries to which his corporation has outsourced job,s
Get the idea?Try it and be prepared to be amazed!

7:47AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

Kenny W - I've evidently sent you a star this week so won't let me "star" you again. Just want you to know I appreciated your comment on Obama's presidency. Thanks.

7:44AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

The author of this article is a complete idiot for leaving out the only one in this race on either side that is not a war monger like our current president or any of the other republican candidates, the only one who has a different approach to the status quo. The only one who can bring about real meaningful change.

4:35AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

One of the best ways to disqualify a candidate for anything is the extent to which he/she insists they have answers to questions they clearly do not or choose not to understand. Except for Huntsman, who has business as well as some inside-the-real-world-of-nations experience, and Paul, who has given some honest thought to his positions (however disagreeable), the sum total of foreign policy and analytical gravitas among the candidates wouldn't fill a thimble. Pathetic. Yet they try to pass themselves off as ready-made leaders and diplomats. This is the level of talent the Republican'ts recruit or encourage to compete for POTUS? This is what the party brains think of the American people -- to try selling us assorted doofuses, cowboys, whiners, puppets, lobbyists, misogynists, and pretenders? You know the adage (so fill in the blank): you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a _____!

4:26AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

Obama's has been so successful as a President that we are taking his successes for granted. For example we just had a military conflict with out the loss of one American life. Name one conflict in history that can compare to that, it borders on a miracle, When I think back I cannot think of one failure we've had in the last three years, (Oh except solyndra, lets focus on one bad investment or the gun running operation that like torture the bush administration started.) I don't think anyone could do a better job than he's done with what he's had to deal with, of course there's bachmann or a perry that could give us more jobs on drilling rigs or picking vegetables. Wake up and stop being complacent and appreciate what it's like to win for a change under intelligent leadership.

4:03AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

I can't look at Mit Romney with out seeing a sweater tied around his neck. Republicans have made these debates funny to watch.

2:22AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

Stop admiring these smirking parasites and giving them free publicity and credence. No one likes them but they are forced on you and you have no choice but their choice, and you believe them, and most of all, you take these fools seriously! 
We should be voting for Policies and not for people. If every other persons job can be taken over by computers why not them? I personally will not be happy until I see a computer take a politicians job! 
Politicians are less useful than my neighbours dog and considerably noisier, but while my neighbours dog costs me nothing and lives in a kennel. These bastards live in mansions paid by us! Yet they will not answer to me!
People'll look at this and say; 'Maaaad! We need politicians!' But do we? Really? And if we do. So much? Even when they're proved to be idiots? They took the place of the kings and the feudal lords and now instead of them being our servants they are our rulers! I think that they and their schemes are just pernicious Memes' that we have yet to deal with.

12:18AM PST on Nov 15, 2011

Yes, it would be nice if all people legally had to follow the same laws. I would love to have a job where I can set my own pay rate, don't have to know what the job description is, workday schedule, number of hours I work each day, create my own taxpayer health insurance plan, create my own taxpayer funded pension plan, require other people to pay me extra for doing them a favor, and oh, yes, create laws and rules that don't apply to me but everyone else must follow or be jailed. And to top it all off, the general population sends money to me so I can publicly ask them to support me in my job (by voting for me). I think I could be forced to make a career out of that type of job! Who knows, after a few very profitable years, I could learn to like it. There is even another perk If I want it: this would be excellent job preparation for becoming president of the United States of America! Somewhere along the line I think we have become quite lost and in desperate need of improvement in our whole political process.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Anyone who hasn't figured this out by now is almost criminally naive. ANYTHING that goes into the mother's…

Sorry to hear about Harapan the Rhino and his family moving from the Sumatran Rhino sanctuary where they've…

NEVER ... until spin, manipulation, corruption and interpretation took a strong hold on available b…

ads keep care2 free

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!