President Obama will pivot to job creation in a speech tomorrow, so there’s lots of speculation on what he should prescribe to boost the economy. His task is urgent, but he’s also facing threat of a double dip recession along with stagnant job growth. Because he is coming up against an intransigent Republican Congress though, the President might have to compromise on some of his goals, there is still a lot of uncertainty about what Obama will propose.
What Obama Should Do
Many are looking back at the Great Depression as a model for the Great Recession. In the Depression, the small stimulus enacted by FDR was only enough to stop the tide of job losses and financial havoc. It was not until after World War Two started and the federal government financed its war effort through substantial debt that the economy began to recover.
Economists and politicos are therefore calling for across the board spending increases financed by increased levels of short term debt. Kevin Drum of Mother Jones, for example, calls for a trillion dollars in infrastructure investment. Given that American infrastructure is literally falling apart at every level, this is a perfect time to invest in its improvement. This timing is especially perfect because short term interest rates are essentially zero, meaning that (unlike any other time in history) America can finance these projects at very low long-term cost.
Drum continues, pointing out that in World War Two, “spending was for war materiel [sic] that was completely useless to the U.S. economy. If we repeated this today, we could do better than that even if half the stimulus spending was meaningless makework.” In other words, guns and bullets — though useful in a war effort — cannot be reinvested into the economy. Things like better infrastructure, though, do help the economy as a whole, making infrastructure investment something that helps not just those who get jobs, but anyone who uses a highway or uses electricity. And because of low interest rates, this would be of little cost to future generations.
Economists are urging a big bill — even bigger than the 2009 stimulus. Bradford DeLong, Berkeley economist, recently said in a speech that the “risks of doing too little now appear to be much larger than the risks of doing too much as far as gap-closing is concerned.” Likewise, Nobel Prize winning Princeton professor Paul Krugman argued that the 2009 stimulus was much too small and further efforts to boost jobs should be substantially larger.
Though increased debt has become a popular Republican talking point, this kind of policy has an inherent appeal to broad constituencies. Indeed, it is not just the favorite of economists, but also is supported by most Americans and even the bond markets. NPR reports that “even the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which has attacked most of Obama’s economic policies, supports such plans for “rebuilding our economic platform.” These projects are politically popular outside Washington because they create jobs at the state and local levels, in both the public and private sectors.”
Photo from Bytemarks via flickr.
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!