START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,186,432 people care about Politics

Who’s Got the Mojo to Win in 2016?

  • 3 of 5

11. Newark, N.J. Mayor Cory Booker

Booker’s meteoric rise has been driven by his boundless energy. It’s hard to hate on an elected official who takes Twitter requests for driveway shoveling and occasionally saves people from burning buildings.

Booker’s path to the presidency is not simple, though. For better or for worse, Mayor of Newark is not the type of position that screams “ready to be president.” To be a viable candidate, Booker must win higher office, and that means he must beat New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie next year.

If Booker wins in 2013, he will certainly have the opportunity to run if he chooses. But that’s a big if. Christie has gained very positive reviews for his handling of the post-Hurricane Sandy recovery effort, and Christie himself has to win to have a shot at 2016. In other words, 2013 becomes the New Jersey primary — the loser of the governor’s race is probably out of the running, at least for this cycle.

Even if he wins, though, Booker will be a year behind his opponents for the nomination, and will have to deal with the inevitable backlash should he run for governor and immediately begin running for president. For that reason, I doubt 2016 is Booker’s cycle, at least for the presidency. The good news for Booker is that he’s young, he’s got a bright future ahead of him, and if he doesn’t run, he’ll be at the top of the VP shortlist.

12. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio

Kucinich lost his House seat this year, and won’t have anything better to do. Why not run in 2016? Oh, sure, he won’t do better than he did in 2004 and 2008, but hey, it’ll keep him off the streets and keep him occupied. I think that’s a good reason to run.

REPUBLICANS

1. Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis.

The GOP primaries are almost certain to come down to a battle of vision between the Tea Party true believers and the old school, quasi-sensible hacks — the political operatives who recognize that purity is not a winning strategy. In the wake of Romney’s defeat, the hacks have been ascendant — hence the sudden embrace by some party leaders of immigration reform.

The true believers are unlikely to go gentle into that goodnight, however. They still have the powerful counter-argument that Romney was really a Massachusetts moderate who failed the movement. Their solution will be to run a candidate who has a proven track record of hating the poor and making the lives of women miserable.

The best-positioned candidate to articulate a message of purity is Paul Ryan. Ryan came out of the Romney campaign largely unscathed among the right; Romney pretty much put Ryan on a bus after the Vice Presidential Debate, which means Ryan wasn’t a visible part of the Romney campaign’s defeat. What’s more, conservatives can argue that Ryan’s budget plan would have won over voters in a way that Romney’s vagueness didn’t.

Ryan has the social conservative bona fides to win, and he’s certainly fiscally conservative. He’s not the only candidate that the right could rally around, but he’s probably the best-positioned. And while it’s possible that Republicans will embrace the hacks, I still tend to think that the energy and activism in the party is with the true believers. For that reason, Ryan starts out atop the list.

2. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush

If the race is going to be between hacks and true believers, then the hacks are going to need a standard-bearer. There are certainly a few candidates to choose from, but none is in better position than John Ellis “Jeb” Bush.

Now, I can see you objecting, noting that the last time we had a President named Bush, things didn’t work out so well. Surely, surely, the Republicans wouldn’t go back to the Bush family again, would they?

Of course they would. For one thing, Republicans have largely blocked out 2001-2009 from their collective memories. For another, Republicans often look back to 1994 wistfully. Why? Because that year, George W. Bush won the Texas governorship, and Jeb Bush barely lost in Florida. Had Jeb won, it’s likely he would have been the Bush running for president in 2000. Would he have won? Maybe. And while it’s damning with faint praise, most observers do believe that Jeb is the more competent of the Bush brothers.

Since leaving office, Jeb has made a living acting like someone who is aware of reality, arguing in favor of immigration reform, and saying he’d be willing to accept some revenue increases as part of a budget deal. Of course, he’s also praised his brother, so he’s not entirely reality-based — but he at least has a passing familiarity with the concept.

There’s no guarantee that Bush runs, but if he does, he’s got the Bush network that he can plug into. That alone will scare off a number of potential candidates. If Jeb is the candidate, he’s probably the standard-bearer for the hacks, and we might get a chance to see whether America is ready for four more years of Bushes. (Spoiler alert: we aren’t.)

  • 3 of 5

Read more: , , , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

112 comments

+ add your own
1:21PM PDT on Mar 11, 2014

Hillary in 2016!!!!!

6:46PM PST on Jan 25, 2013

DLC? Maybe you all know what it stands for, but after the second time you tossed it around I had to do a web search to figure out that you were probably talking about the centrist Democratic Leadership Council in reference to Cuomo. But I'm still not sure. Did you mean Cuomo's "downloadable content" (by far the most hits) style of governance? Disability Law Center? Dragonlance Chronicles? Democrats for the Leisure Class? All go by the acronym DLC. Back in the day, we followed the AP Stylebook. One cardinal rule: always spell out an organization on first reference, and save the acronym for subsequent uses. You take away from the flow of a good piece when you send your reader off to explore the web.

4:53AM PST on Jan 25, 2013

None are suitable.

5:30AM PST on Nov 28, 2012

Joe is a joke....literally.
Hilary is a COWard. She takes responsibility for the failure of Benghazi and then disappears, avoiding any questions before congress about that failure. Why didn't SHE make the rounds on news shows explaining Benghazi instead of Rice, who obama admitted knew squat about it???? Powell and Condi Rice were pretty busy people, yet THEY found time to do news programs to answer for and explain policies and actions.
Warren is another ideological professor ( much like obama) who knows nothing about the real world, the free market economy and job creation.

2:34PM PST on Nov 25, 2012

This is the clearest, most comprehensive list of possible 2016 candidates I've ever seen. It's bookmarked on my computer- job well done!

7:00PM PST on Nov 19, 2012

I would have voted for Hilary Clinton in 2008 if she had won the Democratic nomination then. I would vote for her in 2016. She is clearly the most qualified candidate for the job. I can't believe any person with a brain in their head would vote for Palin. But then again, there are candidates in the Senate who don't believe in "science" who somehow were voted in.

I wouldn't vote for Joe Biden because he was wishy washy about what to do with Bin Laden. He wanted to" wait and see". That is no way to deal with a sworn enemy of the U.S.. Thank God President Obama stepped up to the plate and declared him "wanted dead or alive no matter what" .

11:06AM PST on Nov 19, 2012

I think that Hillary should run. She would at least be respected by the other countries we deal with and she knows what the job entails.

9:03AM PST on Nov 19, 2012

I'll be watching Elzabeth Warren these next few years, hoping someone of her brains and ethics becomes a shining star in the Senate, connecting with people emotionally and through her ability to get the right things done.

For all Clinton's talents, she leaves me cold as a person, and I know I'm not the only one. I have warmer feelings for Sherrod Brown and Biden, but he's gaffe-prone.

12:15AM PST on Nov 19, 2012

thanks,,,,

10:21PM PST on Nov 18, 2012

Just thought if America elected a woman president, would her husband be referred to as "The Fist man?" lol!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

Dan b After the IPCC report that we face extreme consequences for not addressing GW, immediately, do…

I think kids have always been concerned about the world at large, but these days they are allowed the…

Yes, if we have people starving in the streets, that'll teach them. Everyone must pay for their mistakes…

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.