START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
2,552,877 people care about Environment & Wildlife

Who’s Watching The Children?

Who’s Watching The Children?

 

This piece was re-posted from Moms Clean Air Force. Learn More on Facebook.

By Ronnie Citron-Fink

I am not a worrywart. Those who know me know it’s not my nature to be constantly troubled about my kids. As a mom, I allowed them to take the risks they needed to grow. They snowboarded down mountains so high it took my breath away, and dove off cliffs into the ocean (ok, that one I did not know about until after the fact). I breezed through these parental moments, but now I’m totally fit to be tied.

Every day, I read stories like the ones below and wonder why our elected officials are decidedly anti-child.

Who’s watching out for our children as their health and safety is being chipped away?

CHIP…

A New York Times article about a decision against a proposed rule that would have required building contractors to test dust and prove the absence of lead following renovations has got me peeved.

Republicans, led by Senate Environment and Public Works Committee member James Inhofe (R-Okla.), was critical of the proposed testing proposal. He claimed victory after the final rule was issued:

“The intent of the rule, public health protection especially for children and pregnant women, is something everyone supports, but it needs to happen in a way that does not place costly or confusing burdens on those trying to implement it,” ~ James Inhofe

Read closely…this does not relate to protecting children and pregnant women. Does it? It sounds like they are protecting their businesses assets…and their political asses.

Inhofe led a group of GOP senators in sending a letter to the White House to lobby against the clearance testing mandate for lead. Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) called the decision:

“…major victory for small business owners nationwide saddled with needlessly onerous regulations that are stifling their ability to grow and prosper during these difficult economic times.”

You have got to be kidding! Lead…our children!

Do these people have children? Who’s watching out for our children?

What happened to referring to reports that confirmed since the U.S. government banned lead paint in 1978, the percentage of children with high levels of lead in their blood has plummeted from 88% in the 1970s to 1.6% in 2005? This was one of the great triumphs in public health in the last 25 years.

“Children’s health advocates are disheartened that EPA chose not to strengthen the rule and better protect kids by requiring clearance dust testing after renovation work,” ~ Rebecca Morley, executive director of the National Center for Healthy Housing.

Of course they are “disheartened.” Who is protecting our kids from lead dust, which has been proven to cause severe mental and physical development in children…even in small amounts?

CHIP, CHIP…

Then there is this article about gutting the Clean Water Act. Here’s how it starts:

“On Thursday, the House passed a bill that effectively eliminates federal oversight on water standards. The bill rolls back the Clean Water Act, returning most oversight to the states, and passed with almost all Republicans and a handful of Democrats supporting it.

The measure has a title that sounds kind of pleasant—the “Clean Water Cooperative Federalism Act of 2011″—but when you read it you realize it’s really just an effort to return us to the days of the Cuyahoga River fire and Love Canal.”

Just check out the stats in this one:

MAPLight.org crunched the numbers and found that interest groups that supported this motion—like the National Mining Association and the West Virginia Coal Association—gave 94 percent more money to House members who voted in favor of the bill than they did to those who voted against it. Those interest groups gave 61 times as much money ($13,588 total) to Democrats who voted for it as they gave to Dems who voted against it (just $224).”

CHIP, CHIP, CHIP…

There’s a reason the Clean Water and the Clean Air Acts were signed into law in the 1970s: The states weren’t doing a particularly good job of keeping the rivers from catching fire, and the air was putridly polluted.

I’m worried, and I’m not willing to risk the future of our children’s clean air, water and land because some politicians don’t support our children.

Who’s watching out for our children?

We are. The Moms Clean Air Force has got your back. But, you must sign up and join the Force …we can’t fight polluters without you.

Related Stories:

Top 10 American Vacation Spots the House’s Anti-Environment Bill Could Ruin

Green Balloons Over Houston: It’s Time Parents Talk with Congress About Clean Air

Studies Find Arsenic in Apple Juice

Read more: , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

35 comments

+ add your own
7:20PM PDT on Sep 29, 2011

Thank you. What's more importaqnt than our children? Nothing!

5:50PM PDT on Sep 4, 2011

Spot on.

6:04AM PDT on Aug 11, 2011

ty

2:39AM PDT on Aug 1, 2011

I like this woman!

2:30AM PDT on Aug 1, 2011

"Whatcha didn't count on, was another mother of, a Mother Revolution" - Tori Amos

6:52PM PDT on Jul 29, 2011

this isn't even just about children, everything from ecosystems to buisiness leaders to family pets is affected by these things. but the reason you help out doesn't matter as much as the fact that you do, and that we get things changed for the better!

12:39AM PDT on Jul 29, 2011

First the welfare of children should be considered everything else takes a back seat.

10:01PM PDT on Jul 28, 2011

people are so short sighted...

9:43PM PDT on Jul 28, 2011

Actually, if you read more of the final version of this bill it does include a lot of protections against lead dust, and spreads the responsibility to include the homeowner/landlord, and to the construction company to make sure their workers are trained by certified experts in this field, and that proper protective gear is worn, and the work area sealed off during the project, etc. So this doesn't mean that There is to be an assumption that there is lead in any building built before 1978. Those interested in testing for lead in the dust can certainly do that test.

A population of people that is well-informed is the best protection against just about any problem, including lead paint. Building law is incredibly complex, and has many safeguards built in. Building law also has a few rules that can hinder our health.

8:22PM PDT on Jul 28, 2011

You are so right!

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

gosh this made me cry I love them both and the shelter that took care of her...

Darlene... here you go yet again..... so sad...... Where do you see anywhere that I support " insulting…

Come on Mexico! You know this makes sense. Now let's get Argentina to let the polar bear, Arturo, be…

meet our writers

Lindsay Spangler Lindsay Spangler is a Web Editor and Producer for Care2 Causes. A recent UCLA graduate, she lives in... more
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.