19,351,539 members doing good!

The Environment & Wildlife Cause

1,458,313 people care about Environment & Wildlife




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Why Don’t Children’s Picture Books Depict Nature?

125 comments Why Don’t Children’s Picture Books Depict Nature?

What’s happened to depictions of nature in children’s picture books?

A group of researchers led by University of Nebraska-Lincoln sociologist J. Allen Williams Jr. studied the winners of the American Library Association’s prestigious Caldecott Medal between 1938 (the year the prize was first awarded) through 2008. They looked at more than 8,000 images in the 296 volumes, and found decreasing depictions of nature and animals.

The results, published in the journal Sociological Inquiry, are sobering. “There have been significant declines in depictions of natural environments and animals, while built environments have become much more common,” the researchers report.

Specifically, they find images of built and natural environments were “almost equally likely to be present” in books published from the late 1930s through the 1960s. But in the  mid-1970s, illustrations of the built environment started to increase in number, while there were fewer and fewer featuring the natural environment.

Natural Environments Have All But Disappeared

From Miller-McCune:

“This gap widened in every subsequent decade,” Williams and his colleagues write. “Natural environments have all but disappeared.”

In line with this trend, “from the 1960s onward, interactions with wild animals decline steadily.” More surprisingly, even cats and dogs don’t play the role they once did in these stories.

“The probability of a domestic animal serving as a subject declined sharply after 1938 into the 1980s,” the researchers write. “There was a slight rise after this, but the likelihood of finding domestic animal subjects in an image in the 2000s is less than half that of the early years in our study.”

Young Children Today Are Not Being Led To Appreciate Nature

Since illustrated books often play an important role in childhood socialization, this is disturbing news.  These findings suggest that today’s generation of young children are not being led toward an understanding and appreciation of the natural world and the place of humans within it, at least through books.

The American population is more concentrated in urban areas today than it was in 1938, so in one sense, it’s not surprising there are more images today of man-made environments and fewer of the natural world.

Is this part of the reason our kids spend so little time in nature these days? Of course, children don’t only read books that win the Caldecott Medal. But the researchers note that such award-winning volumes tend to sell well, circulate strongly at libraries, and “influence taste for children’s literature” as a whole.

Let’s Re-Connect Children With Nature

The movement to re-connect children with nature is beginning to take off, driven by the alarming childhood obesity rates in this country, as well as the fact that the average youngster spends almost eight hours a day staring at electronic screens.

And this research adds a further reason why this alienation from nature has happened. More than 50% of the world’s population lives in cities now, but nature is still all around and deserves to be present in our children’s picture books.

Without that, we’re missing an opportunity to teach young children about nature and their place in it. These children are the future stewards of our planet, so what will happen if they don’t care?

Related Stories

5 Reasons Children Need Time To Play At School

Doctors Recommend Three Hours’ Daily Exercise For Young Kids

E-Books Or Paper Books? Which Is Best For Kids?

Photo Credit: BigBoy G

Read more: , , , , ,

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

125 comments

+ add your own
11:36AM PST on Mar 9, 2012

Heather - without nature we wouldn't just be unhappy, we would all be dead !!

7:02PM PST on Mar 6, 2012

As a child I remember a book my mother brought for me about animals. She started a curiosity in me that has not faded and continues and I am fifty eight years young. When I brought my babies home from hospital I took them out into the garden to show them nature and now as a Grandmother I love teaching the Grandchildren about animals and nature and they love to learn. Imagine a World without nature...terrible, empty, a concrete jungle and nobody would be happy. To go for a walk in nature is so invigorating and brings peace and contentment. Bring back the books about nature and watch the childrens eyes light up.

8:23AM PST on Feb 12, 2012

Picture books are important for children. It's what they look at before they can even read. It's sad to hear that nature and animals are decreasing in these books. :(

10:34AM PST on Feb 8, 2012

Here in the UK many schools have arrangements for children to tend their own gardens, growing veg and flowers. Many schools have wildlife areas. There are visits to organic farms. There is also an increase in "green" classrooms - lessons spent in the open air, in woodland and so forth. Difficult in built up areas but that its where it is most important. We HAVE to get over the message that we are a part of nature not apart from it. Children's curiosity must be nurtured and developed in this crucial area - but it needs teachers who can do this.

6:40PM PST on Feb 7, 2012

I doubt that the word 'nature' is even describable to most children, today.

2:23AM PST on Feb 7, 2012

Well, I don't have any children, but if this is true, it says a lot about the people who are writing these books and also the publishers!

7:46PM PST on Feb 6, 2012

Great study, very useful and very telling. The urbanizationists seem to want all children to think that "nature" doesn't exist so that it will make it easy for them to destroy the remnants without protest from succeeding generations. It's that what this is all about?? If children stay inside the house and play computer games and have stories read to them that take place in cities with no greenspace or wildlife, how will they form a connection to the natural world? And most importantly, if there's no connection, will they say much to protect it? My guess is now.

7:40PM PST on Feb 6, 2012

The problem is, it's always princess and pretty makeup and dresses. BLECH. :D

3:37PM PST on Feb 6, 2012

We're getting further and further away from nature by living in man-made, artifical cities.

2:13PM PST on Feb 6, 2012

This is an interesting hypothesis. I will take a lot more notice of the content of good children's books and see if the same trend happens here in Australia. I think it may not be so marked here, as we have some Australian writers who do great stories (such as Mem Fox, Bronwyn Bancroft, Jan Omerod) about our wildlife, and nature and animals in general. I hope it continues!

add your comment

20
20 log in or sign up to start earning Butterfly Credits today!


Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

whoa perhaps the should sign some paperwork stating to be left there is they die. ALL should be required…

That is really loving and hospitable, you should be very proud of yourself !! nice lady.......

meet our writers

Judy Molland An award-winning writer and teacher, Judy Molland is also an avid hiker, backpacker, and nature... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!

customize your newsletter

This newsletter will be sent daily and will feature updates on all the causes you care about. Which causes would you like to include?

Copyright © 2012 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved