START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,331,207 people care about Politics

Why Governments are Afraid of Twitter

Why Governments are Afraid of Twitter

How large of a role is Twitter playing in Turkey’s ongoing protests? Large enough to prompt Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan to say, “Social media is the worst menace to society.” No doubt, many of Turkey’s citizens would describe Erdogan using similar terms.

Erdogan condemned Twitter on a televised speech, also decrying that “the best examples of lies can be found there.” The Prime Minister’s words were followed up with actions: Turkish officials arrested 25 people for using Twitter to “encourage rebellion… and making propaganda.” In essence, certain social media users were targeted for spreading word about the growing protests, a movement the Turkish government continues to downplay.

Nonetheless, the arrests have only spawned more activity on Twitter. Citizens continue to unite not only to defend Gezi Park, but to contest a government that does not represent their interests.

This is hardly the first time people have utilized Twitter to organize against their governments. Tunisia and Egypt led the charge two years ago with successful results. Social media, especially Twitter, has given the voiceless a voice and connected people with similar ideologies. Revolutionary actions that once would have been nearly impossible to coordinate are popping up thanks to tools like Twitter.

Social media is especially useful in countries where the media ignores dissent. Turkey’s press is reporting on just about anything other than the protests and police violence happening outdoors. With no public representation of their struggles, the Turkish people have naturally taken to other forms – like Twitter – to disseminate images and information.

That’s why Turkey’s government is threatened enough by social media to haphazardly arrest people for using it. And that’s also why other governments crack down on social media. During Egypt’s protests, the government did its best to block Twitter and internet from its people to prevent further organizing. Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia is advocating for and en to anonymity on Twitter, presumably in part to know who is responsible for sharing radical political ideas.

Initially, Twitter’s role in global uprisings was popular and, as such, good for business. It even fought U.S. government requests to grant it access to private Tweets. Yet as the company grows and aligns with other massive corporations, its priorities have shifted. China blocked Twitter altogether after people shared news of the Urumqi riots, but has since worked out a deal where it heavily censors Chinese Tweets instead.

Social media was not a threat when it was viewed as a tool to browse humorously captioned cat photos and inform people what you’re eating for lunch. But as revolutionaries recognized its potential to democratize ideas, governments have fought to control it.

The elite have power over just about everything. They create the laws, they own the resources and they control the media. The internet is a rare, untamed exception, where the masses have found a venue for freedom of expression and action. As a result, governments now want to take ownership of social media, as well.

That’s why internet-restricting laws like CISPA and SOPA pose more of a threat than they appear to on the surface. It is a preemptive attack to claim the internet as the government’s own tool, before the people can harness its power to counter the existing establishment.

Twitter has the power to liberate. The question is: Will the people be able to free themselves before social media is taken from them?

 

Read more: , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo: Elif Altinbasak/flickr

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

58 comments

+ add your own
7:14PM PDT on Jun 20, 2013

Any totalitarian government fears the social sites like Twitter, Facebook, etc because they no longer have full control of what the good little puppets are supposed to be thinking or doing. No dissention allowed. Ever.

Many Democratic governments fear the social sites like Twitter, Facebook, etc because they have no control over what the Free People have to say and think. The American Government has proven that by their underhanded monitoring of Facebook accounts. They need to do spin/damage control to keep most of us from realizing that we truly do not have complete free speech and thought in this Demcracy.

7:14PM PDT on Jun 17, 2013

Of coarse they are because people can talk and take action when they need

2:04AM PDT on Jun 17, 2013

Thank you for sharing.

6:19AM PDT on Jun 13, 2013

because they are stupid; people can read and comunicate.
Thank you

10:55AM PDT on Jun 12, 2013

Thanks

4:04AM PDT on Jun 12, 2013

Social media has power where real views are sharing

9:58PM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

Orwell's 1984

8:59PM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

Let;s discuss the reasons why We the People have to be constantly on the defensive against what are after all OUR EMPLOYEES - the Government. It is incumbent on US, the Citizens, to lay down the rules and see that our Representatives (for the time being) act strictly within those rules. What Rules ? Well - Isn't that what the Constitution is supposed to be? And if the 2 Centuries old Document is not up to the job of controlling the actions of the Administrators of our Common Affairs, then re-write the document. Are our best men and women today not as capable and idealistic as the Founding Fathers were more than 200 years ago. Let's give ourselves a little more credit. Plus - we have the benefit of the lessons of 200 years of history. We have lost the sense of our own (Free Citizens) importance in the Scheme of Things. We must regain it - the sooner, the better.
.

8:55PM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

Let;s discuss the reasons why We the People have to be constantly on the defensive against what are after all OUR EMPLOYEES - the Government. It is incumbent on US, the Citizens, to lay down the rules and see that our Representatives (for the time being) act strictly within those rules. What Rules ? Well - Isn't that what the Constitution is supposed to be? And if the 2 Centuries old Document is not up to the job of controlling the actions of the Administrators of our Common Affairs, then re-write the document. Are our best men and women today not as capable and idealistic as the Founding Fathers were more than 200 years ago. Let's give ourselves a little more credit. Plus - we have the benefit of the lessons of 200 years of history. We have lost the sense of our own (Free Citizens) importance in the Scheme of Things. We must regain it - the sooner, the better.

6:37PM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

ty

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

meet our writers

Kathleen J. Kathleen is currently the Activism Coordinator at Care2. more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.