START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,307,920 people care about Politics

Why Is A School District Drug Testing 10-Year-Old Students?

Why Is A School District Drug Testing 10-Year-Old Students?

Natalie Cassell just finished fifth grade at Susquenita Middle School in Duncannon, Pennsylvania, located in the Harrisburg metropolitan area. In the fall, Natalie decided to join the Family and Consumer Science Club. As required, Natalie’s parents signed the permission slip allowing her to participate.

By June, 10-year-old Natalie had been randomly tested for drugs three times.

The Susquenita School District is one of several public school districts around the country that require random drug testing for student participation in extracurricular activities. Originally started as a way to combat drug use among high school athletes, in the past decade more districts have expanded the testing to include non-athletic activities. Susquenita is unique in that they test children as young as Natalie.

Natalie’s test came back negative all three times.

Leslie May is a fellow seventh grade student at Susquenita Middle School. She, too, was tested in the fifth grade, as well as sixth grade, and three times during her seventh grade year. In the fall, when Leslie began eighth grade, she was eligible to participate, once again, in the National Honor Society. This time when she brought home her permission slip, her parents refused to consent to the drug testing.

After five negative drug tests, the refusal to be tested again prevented the straight-A student from participating in the National Honor Society.

Susquenita Middle School has grades fifth through eighth and requires parents to consent to the testing. A computer randomly chooses students to be tested. The more activities a student participates in, the chances increase for a student to be chosen more than once. Both full and partial tests are conducted which check for a variety of substances, including marijuana, cocaine and opiates. Students are notified at the time of selection and taken to the testing site by school officials. Parents are notified and can join their child at the site – but must remain in the waiting room at the time of testing.

Leslie’s parents are fed up. They find the tests embarrassing and don’t feel their 14-year-old daughter should have to be subjected to it. “We were so tired of this happening over and over again, so we said ‘what can we do to make it stop?’ We took her out of NJHS because of it,”  said Leslie’s mother Melinda. “It’s sad that this is what we had to resort to. It’s ridiculous.”

Kristin Cassell, Natalie’s mother agrees. “I don’t think it’s necessary for fifth and sixth grades. I told the superintendent, ‘if you see signs, red glassy eyes, a stupor, then I could see testing,’” she said. “It’s too much. (My daughter) is 10-years-old.”

Unfortunately, other than appealing to the district to change their policy, there is little the parents can do to stop it as it’s all perfectly legal. The Supreme Court has even ruled it constitutional.

The Supreme Court ruled in a 1995 case that a school district’s interest in preventing drug use among student athletes outweighed the students’ Fourth Amendment rights. While opponents argue that it infringes on the students’ rights to privacy, the majority argued that public school students, having been placed in the temporary care of the school district, can make choices as de facto parents in regards to their safety. As public school students, therefore, they have less expectation of privacy. Student athletes, which Veronia School District 47J v Acton pertained to, have even less expectation of privacy since they voluntarily participate in activities that already require additional regulation.

In 2002, the same year the Pennsylvania district began their program, SCOTUS expanded it to include all extracurricular activities since these activities are privileges and schools’ continued interest in combatting drug use among students.

During the Bush administration, the Department of Education made drug testing grants available for grades 6-12. The administration was a supporter of drug testing and the grants allowed for testing of those students enrolling school activities as outlined by the Supreme Court’s rulings. By the time the last of those grants was dispersed in 2011, it is estimated that 14 percent of schools did random drug testing on some level, up from 5 percent at the time of the 2000 Supreme Court ruling.

Many school districts believe that requiring the testing helps deter drug use.  A 2007 study, however, disputes this claim, saying that there was no difference in drug use among student athletes in schools with random testing than those without. Even if there is some justification for testing of students participating in things like football, there seems to be less justification to do so for clubs like scrapbooking or the National Honor Society.

Not to mention that it’s an expensive proposition.

Each test costs the school $45 to administer. Another Pennsylvania school district spends $50,000 per year to test their students. In five years, only three students in grades 7-12 have tested positive, with no students testing positive in the last year. That breaks down to more than $16,000 per positive test.

It’s no surprise that drug testing is a multi-billion  dollar a year industry.

As schools are undergoing increased pressures due to budget cuts, many are questioning the efficacy of the drug testing. Some schools have chosen to stop the testing as it impeded their ability to maintain their athletic programs. The parents of Leslie and Natalie also feel that the testing is unnecessary and do more harm than good. Leslie’s parents believe that what it really is doing is deterring good students from participating in healthy, educational activities in order to avoid the intrusion into their privacy.

As for their complaints, the Susquenita School District superintendent said he was not interested in a change in policy.

Read more: , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

106 comments

+ add your own
5:23AM PDT on Jun 26, 2014

Drug testing was a common thing for me during my years in the Army. What I never got used to was that someone has to watch the stream of urine leave your body for the test to be 100% valid. That was barely tolerable when the test observer was a woman in my unit, but who are the observers of these children?

8:40AM PDT on Jun 25, 2014

I agree, they should encourage all kids to get involved in extracurricular activities and they are testing the wrong kids. This program needs a rethink.

9:31PM PDT on Jun 24, 2014

How out of touch can you be? That school is way out of touch.

7:56PM PDT on Jun 24, 2014

our tax dollars at work. DISGUSTING!

11:56AM PDT on Jun 24, 2014

Wow, 10 years old seems a little extreme.

6:44AM PDT on Jun 24, 2014

The kids who are using drugs should be brought into extracurricular activities,not excluded from them. They need something to do with their time that offers them better choices.

4:06AM PDT on Jun 24, 2014

thanks

3:33AM PDT on Jun 24, 2014

Yes, Marc. For profit.

10:33AM PDT on Jun 22, 2014

noted

1:04AM PDT on Jun 22, 2014

Heck of a way to grow up.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

Care2 - Be Extraordinary - Start a Care2 Petition
ads keep care2 free
CONTACT THE EDITORS

Recent Comments from Causes

Thanks Alicia for the informative article and the link to WIRES Facebook page .Kudos to them for their…

I am sure the people in Singleton New South Wales would happily let you have some of their BATS

ads keep care2 free



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.