START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,331,501 people care about Politics

Will A Cabinet Shuffle Make Things Better or Worse?

Will A Cabinet Shuffle Make Things Better or Worse?
  • 1 of 2

There have been rumors swirling in Ottawa that Stephen Harper is planning for a Cabinet shuffle soon after the House of Commons rises for the summer. If the rumors prove true, it could be very interesting to see who lands where in the year old majority government. Several Ministers have had problems on their files, spending scandals and stupid mistakes, but Stephen Harper doesn’t like to be told what to do. Every time the opposition demands a minister resign, Harper seems to dig in his heels with his defense of them. The question is, how much can Canadians handle from these ministers?

A short review of who has been not so great:

Christian Paradis

Currently the Minister of Industry and formerly the Minister of Public Works, Paradis has been found in violation of the conflict-of-interest rules by the House Ethics Commissioner, Mary Dawson, in one investigation over his helped friend and former colleague Rahim Jaffer. He has been accused of ethics violations in at least three other cases, including one case where he is accused of moving an employment insurance center out of an opposition riding and into his own, in a building owned by his father’s business partner.

Tony Clement

Currently the President of the Treasury Board and thus in charge of the government’s spending and the cuts currently being made in the Conservatives new budget. Clement’s riding was set to host the G8 summit in 2009. As a result, over $40 million was spent sprucing the place up. In the end, the summit was moved to Toronto (which turned out really well). The G8 Legacy Infrastructure Fund, which totaled $45.7 million, was spent on various projects in the Parry Sound–Muskoka riding. It was meant for “essential facilities” for the summit – that’s what the House of Commons approved it for – but was spent on such things as expansions to a community center and a gazebo an hour away from what was to be the meeting site. The opposition New Democrats have released many documents that they say prove Clement himself was involved in picking the project to be funded. Clement said he only made recommendations – all of which happened to be accepted.

Peter MacKay

The Minister of Defense, who loves a good photo op, has been making different claims about Canada’s purchase of the F-35 fighter jets and why the numbers got so confused. He also has a habit of using military equipment to get him where he needs to go. MacKay and his Associate Minister Julian Fantino have not been doing a very good job of stemming the tide of opposition attacks and they tend to contradict themselves and each other.

  • 1 of 2

Read more: , , , , , , , , ,

Photo Credit: 416Style

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

14 comments

+ add your own
5:51PM PDT on Jun 28, 2012

@ Steve R. i'll tell you exactly how he was elected, never once in his campaigning did he mention that he was going to gut environmental laws, increase the OAS from 65 to 67, or change our EI system so that it will be harder for the everyday worker to recieve these benefits that we have payed for our entire employment career. but now that he has his false majority (and i say false because only roughly 25% of eligible voters voted conservative) he thinks that he can just ram through whatever legislation that helps out his corporate/big oil buddies without a care in the world to what it might mean for the rest of the 99%.

I definitely don't agree with all that Obama has done during his time as president (especially the signing into law of the NDAA) but your country is much better off with him in charge then it would be with Mitt RMoney. If your country was smart you would all be backing Ron Paul as he seems to be the only candidate out there who actually appears to the have the general publics best interests at heart.

5:40PM PDT on Jun 28, 2012

@ Steve R. i'll tell you exactly how he was elected, never once in his campaigning did he mention that he was going to gut environmental laws, increase the OAS from 65 to 67, or change our EI system so that it will be harder for the everyday worker to recieve these benefits that we have payed for our entire employment career. but now that he has his false majority (and i say false because only roughly 25% of eligible voters voted conservative) he thinks that he can just ram through whatever legislation that helps out his corporate/big oil buddies without a care in the world to what it might mean for the rest of the 99%.

I definitely don't agree with all that Obama has done during his time as president (especially the signing into law of the NDAA) but your country is much better off with him in charge then it would be with Mitt RMoney. If your country was smart you would all be backing Ron Paul as he seems to be the only candidate out there who actually appears to the have the general publics best interests at heart.

5:19PM PDT on Jun 12, 2012

Shuffling cabinets but keeping the same system and expecting different results fits the definition of insanity.

6:43AM PDT on Jun 12, 2012

It amazes me that liberals have this idea that governments are not good for the people that elected them, because LIBERALS SAY SO!

But when governments are REALLY bad - like the Obama administration, liberals will support them.

Of course, even the liberal support for our big spender is waning fast.

As for Canada - if everything Harper does is "against Canadian and human interests" (Dorothy N), please explain HOW and WHY he was elected?

Yes Sue M - you and most liberals would be quite happy with a "minority government". Not sure how that would "provide the proper checks and balances" - it didn't really work out very well in Zimbabwe and South Africa and most other former British colonies, now did it?

7:30PM PDT on Jun 11, 2012

All the ministers listed here are quite noteworthy for their incompetence and should have done the right thing by resigning from their cabinet posts after various scandals hit.

That being said, a cabinet shuffle is pretty much irrelvant. Individual cabinet minsters have absolutely no say in how the government is run. All decisions are made in Fearless Leader Harper's office. All the other Conservative MPs are just yes men who do what they're told like good little soldiers...

5:53PM PDT on Jun 11, 2012

I really don't think it would make things different, Harper would still be in charge and that is the problem atm

3:57PM PDT on Jun 11, 2012

Thanks for posting!

2:44PM PDT on Jun 11, 2012

surprised Haper has not shut down Parliment fired all MP's from all Parties and run the country on his own this would make him the happy little dictator he aspires to be

2:43PM PDT on Jun 11, 2012

Thank you for sharing.

1:22PM PDT on Jun 11, 2012

Every cabinet shuffle is done for a specific reason.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

My question to these ignorant homophobes. If you or someone in your family needed a blood transfusion…

Signed petition. I doubt our government will do anything to protect them as I believe the heads of government…

How can anyone be so stupid?

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.