START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
567,085 people care about Real Food

Will New York’s Proposed Big Size Sugary Drink Ban Fizzle?

Will New York’s Proposed Big Size Sugary Drink Ban Fizzle?

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has proposed a ban on the sale of large-sized sodas or sugary drinks — the first in the nation — at restaurants, movie theaters and food carts, in an effort to combat obesity. More than half New York City’s adults are obese or overweight, says Dr. Thomas Farley, the city’s health commissioner, and sweetened drinks are to blame for up to half of the rise in obesity rates.

Starting as early as March of next year, any sweetened drink that is 16 fluid ounces (equivalent to a medium-sized cup of coffee and smaller than the average soda bottle) or more would be banned. Included would be sugary drinks including soda, energy drinks and pre-sweetened ice tea, whether served in delis, fast-food restaurants or sports arenas.

The New York City Beverage Association is not happy, commenting about the “New York City health department’s unhealthy obsession with attacking soft drinks” and how “zealous proposals just distract from the hard work that needs to be done” in the fight against obesity. But Dr. Farley points out that obesity rates are higher in the city in areas where the consumption of sugary beverages is more common and that about a third of New Yorkers drink about one sugary drink per day.

The city’s Board of Health still needs to vote on the mayor’s proposal; as Bloomberg (dubbed “big soda Scrooge” in the New York Daily News) appointed all of its members, approval seems likely. The mayor has made public health a central feature of his tenure in office, having also banned smoking in restaurants and parks, prohibited the use of artificial trans fat in restaurant food and made it mandatory that health inspection grades be posted in restaurant windows.

How effective the big soda ban will be remains to be seen. One woman interviewed in the New York Daily News says she’ll just buy two medium sodas.

NPR’s The Salt blog suggests that the ban, while stemming from the best intentions, may not affect obesity rates at all. The proposed ban does not affect a whole other category of large-size drinks, those containing at least 70 percent fruit juice as well as lattes, coffee drinks or milkshakes that contain at least 51 percent dairy (and an awful lot of calories). David Just, a professor of behavioral economics at Cornell University, points out that the ban overlooks why people tend to buy large-size sodas, because they see the price per ounce and realize they get more (literally) for their money.

In Cornell’s experiments on food and behavior, if people are told that they can’t have a large size for health reasons, they tend to fight it. So for example, instead of a 64 oz. soda, they may go buy eight 8 ounce bottles, he says.

Also, Just says, soda is just one small piece of the obesity puzzle, and it’s ultimately pretty hard to pin a whole epidemic on one item.

Still, keep in mind how supersized servings of drinks and food have become in the past 50 years in the US. In the 1950s, a 7 ounce soda was the norm. By those standards, 16 ounces of a sugary drink is plenty — and, indeed, there’s no ban on how big a serving of plain old water we, or New Yorkers, can drink.

 

Related Care2 Coverage

Donut Blues: Does Eating High-Fat Foods Make Us Depressed?

Why It Is In Our Best Economic Interest to Fight Obesity

Supersize Portions Are the New (Ab)Normal in the US (Infographic)

 

Read more: , , , , , , , ,

Photo by Ian Wilson

quick poll

vote now!

Loading poll...

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

100 comments

+ add your own
4:34AM PDT on Aug 23, 2012

Why not just reduce the sugar content in all sizes of drink?

9:29AM PDT on Aug 8, 2012

E' una buona notizia?

10:39PM PDT on Jun 27, 2012

Even if this ban won't really fix the problem, it might make some people less likely to drink the big sodas. Since there are no foreseen bad consequences, even though the good effects might be small the bill is still a good idea.

10:40PM PDT on Jun 16, 2012

Individual freedom seems hard wired into the American psyche so that the attitude of "No one can tell me what to eat or drink me what to eat or drink" is so prevalent.
Governments at all levels are charged with protecting the health of the population, just as much as protecting the nation from terrorism or invasion. I just cannot understand why so many people are against disease causing obesity and substances which encourage it.

I understand that obesity cost New York some $4 billion last year. If that figure is anywhere near accurate, perhaps it is time to "pay for individual freedom".

4:29PM PDT on Jun 6, 2012

I don't know why you just wouldn't increase the taxes on them.

2:43PM PDT on Jun 5, 2012

banning will just make some people wwant it more...

1:31PM PDT on Jun 5, 2012

of course

10:50AM PDT on Jun 5, 2012

I live in England where, as far as I am aware, huge drinks such as these are not routinely available - in fact given the prices that most of our restaurants tend to charge for soft drinks (in bars it is often equal to or more than a beer) I am not sure that many people would be able to afford to buy one if they did. Having said this banning them is surely a step too far. People have minds, they use their minds to negotiate all sorts of dangers, if Government feels so strongly about limiting the risks people face then what will be next, someone to see you across the road possibly!

6:43AM PDT on Jun 5, 2012

This effort by Mayor Bloomberg will fail to get the Super Gulpers to stop gulping the sugary but it will achieve debate and attention to the issue but I think he knew that when he made the proposal so in a way he has achieved what he set out to do. Good for him

6:41AM PDT on Jun 5, 2012

The only reason Bloomberg wants to ban large drinks, he is too small to hold unto one! The only thing big about this guy is his bankroll. He needs to carry a booster seat around with him.

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

It's nice to be able to track our food. So many countries have such a shortage, that they don't really…

Sanders & Warren in 2016 and help end this crap VOTE 2014 & 2016 !!!

I would have found those threats to the MRA conference horrifying if the man running the conference had…

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.