START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x
1,378,905 people care about Politics

Yes, the Government Has Access to Your Data

Yes, the Government Has Access to Your Data

A government agency has been collecting the phone records of tens of millions of citizens “on an ongoing daily basis” in the name of “national security” as directed by a “secret order.”

The same government agency has been obtaining direct access to the systems of Google, Facebook, Apple and other major U.S. internet companies.

Is this legal?

Should we be freaking out that, via these programs, the government could be collecting information about communications made entirely within the U.S. and without a warrant?

NSA Surveillance of Verizon Phone Records

The U.S. agency in question is the National Security Agency (NSA). Since April 25, millions of Americans have had metadataabout their phone records collected under a “secret order” signed by Judge Roger Vinson of the secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISA).The document was published by the Guardian on Wednesday.

Private information about the contents of the phone calls, or about the names or addresses of customers, is not included in the records. But metadata, “data about the data,” is gathered, including every caller’s and recipient’s phone numbers, the unique serial number of the phones used and the time and duration that each call lasts. The location of the two participants can also be collected.

Some say that collecting phone record metadata is tantamount to seeing the envelope of a letter but not the contents inside. But as privacy advocates (citing the recent subpoenas of the call records, including telephone metadata, of Associate Press journalists) point out, there’s plenty that can be gleaned from just that.

PRISM: The Government Has Direct Access to Communications on Google and Facebook

The NSA has been able to tap directly into the servers of major Internet companies, another secret document — a 41-page Powerpoint presentation dated April 2013 — obtained by the Guardian reveals.

Via a program called PRISM, government officials can collect material including search history, the content of emails, file transfers and live chats. Since the program was started in 2007, those participating in it include Microsoft (whose current advertising campaign trumpets that “Your privacy is our priority”), Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, YouTube, Skype, AOL and Apple — that is, the very companies that provide us with most of the online email, search, video and communications networks that we use to communicate.

According to the document obtained by the Guardian, “PRISM was introduced to overcome what the NSA regarded as shortcomings of FISA warrants in tracking suspected foreign terrorists.” The U.S. is described as having a “home-field” advantage as so much of the Internet’s architecture is housed in it. Under FISA, both the sender and receiver of a communication must be outside the U.S.; this is seen as a “shortcoming” in the information that the NSA could obtain about suspected foreign terrorists.

PRISM enables the government to go directly to the servers of Facebook and other companies, to obtain communications without having to obtain court orders and without having to make any requests to service providers. Both stored communications as well as real-time collection of targeted users’ information can be acquired.

The Patriot Act is Very Much Alive, Well and in Use

Both the NSA’s collecting of Verizon phone records and the PRISM program are being justified as falling under the Bush-era Patriot Act, according to which the government can have access to business records for “foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations.”

U.S. spy chief James Clapper has affirmed the existence of PRISM and denounced its disclosure as “reprehensible.” Verizon, Google and the other companies have all denied granting access to the government.

In the wake of the documents’ disclosure, government authorities have been defending the collecting of users’ records and other data as being authorized under law, known to Congress and necessary in the fight against terrorism. Noting that the secret court order published this week by the Guardian is, as far as she knows, “the exact three-month renewal of what has been the case for the past seven years,” Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, said at an impromptu press conference on Capitol Hill on Thursday that “this is called protecting America. People want the homeland kept safe.”

Civil Liberties Are Under Threat

Eeven as all three branches of the U.S. government are asserting that they have signed off on the surveillance programs, civil liberties advocates have been aghast at the revelation of just how far individual’s rights are being infringed upon in the digital ageSaid Anthony Romero of the American Civil Liberties Union, “A pox on all the three houses of government. On Congress, for legislating such powers, on the FISA court for being such a paper tiger and rubber stamp, and on the Obama administration for not being true to its values.”

In contrast to his criticism of many of former President George W. Bush’s policies, President Obama has, in the case of government surveillance, pursued the same policies. Indeed, he has done so “even more vigorously” and at a time when his administration is seeking to make China abandon its own program of cyber-espionage.

The recent revelations about how NSA can be said to be spying on millions of Americans make it clear that, in the effort to protect Americans, the government has far too broadly interpreted the power it has to infringe on the right to privacy of the country’s citizens. On Thursday, Representative Jim Sensenbrenner, Republican of Wisconsin, who introduced the Patriot Act in 2001, stated that he is “extremely troubled by the F.B.I.’s interpretation” of the law. Noting his concern about its possible abuse, Sensenbrenner said that “seizing phone records of millions of innocent people is excessive and un-American.”

Americans certainly don’t think that they live in a police state. But under the Patriot Act, and the government’s use, implementation and even abuse of power in the name of protecting homeland security, something like the modern surveillance state has and is being created.

That very thought should make a person at least consider freaking out.

 

Read more: , , , , , , , , , ,

Photo from Thinkstock

have you shared this story yet?

some of the best people we know are doing it

161 comments

+ add your own
8:53AM PDT on Jun 23, 2013

Yep, that's the Government and America everyone protects with our lives...myself included. I am sorry.

4:39AM PDT on Jun 12, 2013

OK ok I get it but what do we do about it !
As we can all see the whistle blowers protection is not working and the messenger it seems is getting shot!

8:34PM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

ObamaNation ... George Orwell revisited.

5:47PM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

If the government finds what every American does interesting, they more time on their hands than I thought they had.

12:02PM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

I think this so wrong, but there's nothing we can do about it. I'm glad I wont be around in 40 years or so, to see what this country does to it's people.

10:38AM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

tyvm...

10:10AM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

If you voted for Bush, you are partially responsible for the Patriot Act, which makes all this legal. Stop whining, you asked for it, you got it.

4:35AM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

...and he criticized Bush for what he did. Obama is multiplying it by about a thousand! Which is something he would NOT do! Just another lie!

12:13AM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

You see, information is just so much easier to obtain and one does not need a gun or a hitman to do the job. The flow of information is such at ease that a 5 year old kid can ask a parent what's beastiality? As for me, I learned that definition in my senior year abnormal psychology.Internet controls? Forget it, all a child needs is to get to a cyber cafe, friends house with wifi and any place they can get wifi. A child spends more time on the internet and the computer than on the TV. TV ain't interesting anymore because of all the nonsensical commercials and breakups of the series to accommodate them. TV is only for live sports but then we can also watch it on the computer.

Edward Snowden and Manning, your blowing whistle for your sake of information liberty is nonsensical. You guys need to think of the masses and not yourselves. As intelligent officers you ought to use your skills to negotiate with your bosses and protect 300 million Americans but you have not done at all except to say that the Gov is tightening the net and communication lines. Dudes, Thumbs down, and I'll send you your six pack when you are in prison!

12:10AM PDT on Jun 11, 2013

Edward Snowden, the whistle blower, said that because even if you're not doing anything wrong you're being watched and recorded. And the storage capability of these systems increases every year consistently by orders of magnitude to where it's getting to the point where you don't have to have done anything wrong.

Why should we as citizens who did nothing wrong we have to worry what the Govt is watching? Right now the world is such a tumultuous place with child porn and trafficking of women rife in our midst and our children are basically hoodwinked by predators to do something silly and eventually we have to spend millions and millions of man hours looking for them. America just came out from a difficult time when lone wolves or pack of wolves just suddenly appear and make our days shocking if not fearful. Workplace violences have spike as well when these individuals, with grudges, suddenly want to poke into the world of fear to learn some wholesome tricks so that they can get back at their colleagues or bosses. Making poisons have been a touch-&-go formula because its available in the internet. I did not even think that you can even get the ricin formula from the internet let alone an actress who has a grudge with her husband and decided to teach him a lesson by sending them to our President, the mayor of NY and the Head of the org for gun control. You see, information is just so much easier to obtain and one does not need a gun or a hitman to do the job. The flow of

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

ads keep care2 free

Recent Comments from Causes

I do not want dogmatic religion in my child's face when they go to school. School is a place for education…

Cathleen K.: Please stop being so cruel. This is a place for people to get together and learn about making…

meet our writers

Kristina Chew Kristina Chew teaches and writes about ancient Greek and Latin and is Online Advocacy and Marketing... more
Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!
ads keep care2 free

more from causes

Animal Welfare

Causes Canada

Causes UK

Children

Civil Rights

Education

Endangered Wildlife

Environment & Wildlife

Global Development

Global Warming

Health Policy

Human Rights

LGBT rights

Politics

Real Food

Trailblazers For Good

Women's Rights




Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.