START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

80% of Baby Products Contain Flame Retardants

80% of Baby Products Contain Flame Retardants

Researchers from several universities found flame retardants in about 80% of baby products they tested. One hundred and one polyurethane foam samples were examined in their study. The foam came from the following products: car seats, changing table pads, infant sleep positioners, portable crib mattresses, nursing pillows, high chairs, nursery rocking chairs/gliders, baby walkers, baby carriers, and assorted bathroom items.

The most common flame retardant detected was tris (1,3-dichloroisopropyl) phosphate (TDCPP). A federal website states this chemical can cause irritation of the skin, and respiratory tract. It may also cause swelling of the lungs. Ironically, when it does catch fire and burn, the byproducts are toxic fumes of chlorine, phosphorus oxides and hydrogen chloride gas. In 2006, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) published a statement about flame retardants in furniture foam, “upholstered furniture manufactured with TDCPP treated foam might present a hazard to consumers, based on both cancer and non-cancer end points.” (Source:

Many of the flame retardants found were chlorinated organophosphates – 60 of the 101 foam samples contained them. There were also two flame retardants identified that they said are not even in the scientific literature yet, due to manufacturer trade secrets.

Arnold Schecter, a public health physician said, “This is a little worrisome. It’s important to know this. And the next important thing is to find out how frequent this is, what levels are there and what sort of risk this poses. The big question is: What is the toxicity? And how much is getting into children?” (Source: Discovery News)

They also found PentaBDE, a type of retardant that was phased out of use in 2004 due to health concerns, but some products containing it are still in use. The reason flame retardants were found in baby products is that they are legally required to be resistant to fire for safety reasons; yet exposing babies to potentially harmful chemicals hardly seems safe.

One of the more disturbing statements from the study paper was simply that some ingredients in the flame retardants are not known to the companies who manufacture the baby products containing them, “Many of the chemical ingredients in flame retardant mixtures are proprietary and are not disclosed by the chemical manufacturers, even to manufacturers using these chemicals in their final end products (e.g., furniture).” (Source:

Babies and toddlers are believed more likely to be exposed to flame retardants because the chemicals are found in dust which accumulates on floors where young children spend much of their time.

The researchers wrote that their study is the first to examine flame retardants in baby products, as far as they know. (Recently a related study found that many pet dogs and cats contain flame retardants, because they lay on floors and inhale dust containing them.)

Image Credit: Mehregan Javanmard

Related Links

Dogs and Cats Contain Flame Retardants
Toxins Should be Better Regulated Say Docs

Read more: Babies, Conscious Consumer, General Health, Health & Safety, Home,

have you shared this story yet?

go ahead, give it a little love


+ add your own
1:48AM PDT on Jun 8, 2012

Can anyone tell me of a manufacturer of gliders/rocking chairs that does not use flame retardants? Thanks!

8:10AM PDT on Jul 26, 2011

cancer or burn ?????

6:47PM PDT on Jun 27, 2011


6:54PM PDT on May 27, 2011

Very disturbing, but immensely informative article. Thank you!

6:46AM PDT on May 26, 2011

Had no idea, thankyou

6:03AM PDT on May 25, 2011

It's no wonder so many children have health problems that don't go away as they grow older. They are exposed, from the moment of birth, to chemicals whose dangers are not even known, or are inadequately tested for. Plus, they lull people into a false sense of security and make them more likely to be careless with fire, to not check smoke detectors or have wiring inspected, etc. Flame retardants do not protect you from fire!

4:32AM PDT on May 24, 2011


10:12AM PDT on May 23, 2011


5:11AM PDT on May 23, 2011

Thanks for the article.

12:00AM PDT on May 23, 2011

Thanks for the informative article

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

people are talking

I believe the EPA reversed their decision of thirty years ago because they were in the pockets of Mo…

Well that's not very local for me so I guess I won't be trying it.

And beyond there the US government is guilty of siccing men on women also.....I am a victim of US go…

I agree, baby too close to doggy. Be careful. Dogs are still animals, no matter how much we trust …


Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!