START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

A Farm Bill to Improve Our Health

Source: Environmental Working Group

“Power, money, bad traditions and bad attitudes have been ruling the Farm Bill”, said Ken Cook in San Francisco. He showed two maps to demonstrate how broken the system is. On the first one, the Bay Area disappeared under a thick blanket of pins designating farm-subsidy recipients–no matter that the region’s farms  were notoriously displaced long ago by  urban development. On the second map, the middle of the country was colored in red, indicating the location of the 22 districts that received half of all subsidies between 1995 and 2004, out of a total of 435 (see above).

Needless to say that the 2012 electoral climate is going to provide a most challenging context for the proponents of a Farm Bill built on new priorities. Their foolhardy enterprise is bound to pit them against the usual suspects. The American Farm Bureau, a powerful lobby in Washington that represents mostly the interests of the big farms and is a staunch supporter of the subsidies, is not about to let go of its grip over the current system. Interestingly enough, 23 Congress members are so entrenched in the latter as to have collected, either directly or through their family, over 5.8 million dollars of farm subsidies between 1995 and 2009 (91.6% of it went to 17 Republicans, six Democrats shared the rest).

Yet, there are also reasons to be optimistic. Unbeknowst to most of us, the Farm Bill funnels the largest amount of Federal funding to conservation programs: 22 billion dollars were thus invested through the last  Bill. “And that’s only because outsiders [i.e. environmental and conservation advocates] insisted on it!” stressed Ken Cook.

“How about allocating 1 billion dollars to salad-bars in every school in the country? Let’s get kids hooked on good, healthy food, and reap huge health-care costs savings in the future!” he continued.

Maybe that’s not that far-fetched of a goal. According to Andrew Weil, all it would take for the elected officials to be swayed by public opinion is the mobilization of just 5% of us. Why does he suggest this? Because that’s what it took for the European Union to impose a moratorium on GMO in 1998. It may be  wishful and somewhat naive, but we need all the scraps of encouraging signs available to remind ourselves that anything is actually possible if we, citizens of this big nation, put our collective mind to it.

Read more: Blogs, Food, News & Issues, The Green Plate, , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

go ahead, give it a little love

Laetitia Mailhes

Laetitia Mailhes is a French-born journalist. After many years as the technology and innovation correspondent of the French "Financial Times" in San Francisco, she decided to focus on what truly matters to her: sustainable food and farming. Find more articles and videos on her blog, The Green Plate Blog.


+ add your own
3:53AM PST on Nov 10, 2011

Thanks for the article.

10:43AM PDT on May 18, 2011

Thanks for sharing.

9:21AM PDT on May 18, 2011

Noted with interest.

7:51PM PDT on May 16, 2011


2:02AM PDT on May 16, 2011

Thanks for sharing

5:22PM PDT on May 15, 2011

Thanks for this posting. Good to know about it.

5:11PM PDT on May 15, 2011

Thank you for posting :]

2:39PM PDT on May 15, 2011


add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

people are talking

I buy chicken that is raised without all this , the Perdue brand, I think Sanderson is too.Small far…

I was once offered an ivy. It was very small but I liked it because the leaves were thick, brilliant…


Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!