START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Baby Genius? It All Depends on How You Define Smarts

Baby Genius? It All Depends on How You Define Smarts

Every proud parent likes to boast about the inherent intelligence of their gurgling baby. Either you will agree with them or you won’t (even if you don’t agree with them, you politely will nod with a smile). New studies clearly demonstrate that babies and very young children know, observe, explore, imagine and learn more than we would ever have thought possible. In many significant ways, they are even smarter than adults. I will tell you honestly and quite upfront, this is not the first time I have reported on these sorts of findings. Actually, just a few years back I blogged about how babies, as well as young children, experience the world via an extremely wide spectrum of sensation, as opposed to the miniscule sliver of sentient reality that we adults experience. So why am I treading old ground and covering this subject yet again? Well to draw attention to more elaborate studies by Alison Gopnik, professor of psychology at UC Berkeley, and to remind our adult readers (who may have missed it the first time) what is actually going in the intricate and Byzantine minds of babies everywhere.

As mentioned above, Alison Gopnik, as well as being a psych professor, is also author of the newly published “The Philosophical Baby“, which investigates the exploratory and analytic nature of the young child’s mind. Counter to what was previous assumed, that babies were just blank slates of blooming and buzzing confusion, Gopnik points out that babies have an astonishing capacity for statistical reasoning, experimental discovery and probabilistic logic, which enables them to learn about the myriad of objects and people surrounding them with greater depth and efficiency than previously assumed (I could go into case studies and particular experiments here, but you would be best served reading it first hand rather than slogging through my abbreviated accounts).

The truly notable meaning to gather from all this, is not that we all now need to spend the remainder of our diminishing paychecks on new fangled programs and products that will make our babies even smarter, but we need to encourage babies and toddlers to remain curious and continue to explore their surroundings. At this age, they are not as specifically focused and goal oriented as their eager parents, and the learning they do on their own, when they carefully watch and unexpected outcome and draw new conclusions from say, a set of car keys or a cup of spilled water, is radically different than how adults view and consider learning. Babies (and this is the truly wonderfully subversive part of the whole message) can learn an enormous amount from simple items (bowls, blocks, items from nature, etc) and simple interactions, that have nothing to do with “enriching” educational toys, games, and DVDs.

Should we just throw out all of those “educational toys” and save on future expenditures by allowing our children to explore and learn, not in the rigid adult prescribed way, but in a fashion that is more suited to their development?

Read more: Babies, Blogs, Caregiving, Children, Family, Parenting at the Crossroads, , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

go ahead, give it a little love

Eric Steinman

Eric Steinman is a freelance writer based in Rhinebeck, NY. He regularly writes about food, music, art, architecture, and culture and is a regular contributor to Bon Appétit among other publications.

5 comments

+ add your own
4:34PM PST on Nov 22, 2011

everyone is smart in their own way

6:40AM PST on Nov 22, 2011

thanks for sharing

4:51AM PST on Nov 22, 2011

thanks

8:51AM PST on Nov 21, 2011

thanks. I still love marveling over the out of sight out of mind theory that babies have XD

add your comment



Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

people are talking

Agave not a good idea because its highly processed and 90% fructose, try balsamic vinegar instead. W…

TY. Excellent. (See also C2 articles on where NOT to use vinegar and some other ingredients.)

It is a widespread myth that black tea contains more caffeine than green tea, and another myth that …

Story idea? Want to blog? Contact the editors!



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.