By Kelsey Murray – DietsInReview.com
We should be able to trust the FDA to protect us from foods that may not be safe for our consumption, right? I never would have questioned this before, but after Del Monte Fresh Produce recently filed a lawsuit that could have long-term consequences against the regulatory organization, I am starting to have my doubts.
The FDA recently forced Del Monte to halt the importation of its Guatemalan cantaloupes because of the possibility that the fruits were contaminated with salmonella. Then, Del Monte fired back against the FDA with a lawsuit. This all seems like standard operations, but the problem is that in the future, it is possible that the FDA will become more reluctant to issue warnings against possibly-contaminated foods to avoid legal proceedings.
“If this case is successful from an industry perspective, it will change the attitude of regulators,” said David Acheson, the former FDA Assistant Commissioner, at Huffington Post. “They will obviously be more reluctant.”
If this is the case, it could have serious consequences for the health of the general public.
“More often than not the public health authorities and the epidemiologist are correct,” said Michael Doyle, the director for the Center for Food Safety at the University of Georgia. “If you start putting public health officials in the cross hairs of the lawyers it’s probably going to have a major dampening effect on whether foods are recalled in time to prevent a substantial amount of illnesses.”
In March 2011, Del Monte issued a voluntary recall of the questionable cantaloupes after it was determined that the fruits were linked to 12 cases of salmonella poisoning by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the FDA. Then, in July 2011, the FDA issued an import alert, which stopped the importation of these fruits. Del Monte is filing their lawsuit because they claim that the FDA issued the alert based on “erroneous speculative assumption, unsupported by evidence.”
In my opinion, the FDA is here to serve the general public and should be able to issue any alerts or recalls for foods that are determined to be unsafe for human consumption. However, if Del Monte is correct and the FDA issued its alert without proper information, then the company should be able to file a lawsuit to protect their image.
“That is the difficulty the FDA is dealing with – when do you warn, when do you not warn, when do you urge a recall,” said Fred Degnan, a lawyer who specializes in food law in private practice. “This is a brave new world for FDA and for industry.”
Only time will tell what this lawsuit will mean for the future of the FDA and their regulation policies.
RELATED ARTICLES
Recipe: Melon Salsa
Papaya Recalled Due to Salmonella
Starbucks Recalls Bistro Box Meals Due to Lysteria
Read more: Do Good, Health, Health & Safety, News & Issues, cantaloupe, del monte, FDA, legal system, recalls
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Useful post, really!! Thanks a lot!
I can see the point, but did they do any research on where people grew up, like cities with cars, po…
Sounds good, thanks Katie.
I give my dogs natural anti-flea drops which contain garlic, but your list of bad foods lists garlic…
I've had my eye on this book for awhile now. Looks amazing! msred5@gmail.com
59 comments
+ add your ownthanks
Hard to know who to trust-the huge bureaucratic agencies entrusted with our care and safety affecting large business, or the huge agribusinesses with so much to lose, who put continuous pressure and influence on the governmental agencies?
thanks for sharing
Thanks.
Thank goodness the FDA is taking action to protect us from infected produce. Needless to say, of course, if they have the power to issue recalls, they also have the obligation to be as sure as is humanly possible that they are correct -- that the infection exists, that the source is correctly identified, and that the recall is the appropriate action.
All of which is a lot to ask of an agency that is grossly undersized, undermanned, and underfunded. If they're going to protect us, yet not issue unnecessary recalls, then they need more power and more funding. Then they can do the research they need, to stand up to corporate threats.
wow, that's scary
We nned the FDA but we need a better one. Cause honestly they are sucking at their job. Approving GMO's and many many other chemicals and toxins it's absolutely ridiculous. If we had a better FDA we could save lives!!!
Next they will start sueing the victoms of these outbreaks they cause because it hurts their image. Time to start charging corperate heads with Manslaughter and assult when their products harm and kill people that eat them. Then and only then will they start acting responsible.
No matter how you look at it they are both poisoning us all!
Sheez! People just sue for anything and everything these days. I think companies like this should just get over themselves and see that it was for the good of the public not for their bottom line. If someone were to die because of this, then it would have been the consumers families that would be suing for the death. hmmm....
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment
20