START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

GMO In Your Apples? No Thanks, USDA!

GMO In Your Apples? No Thanks, USDA!

There are no two ways to slice this: the genetically-engineered apple that the USDA is about to approve is not good news.

Here is why:

1. Despite what the powers that be are claiming, there is NO conclusive scientific evidence that GMO (genetically modified organisms) are safe for our health, our children’s and their children’s. (Just allow me to share this disturbing news regarding the health issues of pigs that have been fed GMO over several generations.) Feeding our children GMO corn syrup-laced processed food is bad enough. Many of us are aware of the risk. Now, the prospect of GMOs hiding in apples, the very epitome of kids’ healthy snack, is too creepy for words.

2. Genetically-engineered apple orchards are bound to impact our environment. The trick is, we frankly don’t know how. There’s no need to be a Ph.D. in Natural Resources Management to understand that, unfortunately, the long-term impact of modified trees is of a different order of magnitude than that of crops like corn.

3. Just because the risks to human health and the environment are uncertain doesn’t mean that Okanagan Specialty Fruits Inc., the company behind the Arctic Apple (as it is called), ought to be given a blank check by the US government. In fact, uncertainty is precisely what Europeans invoke when they apply the precautionary principle. It goes like this: show me it’s safe, and I’ll give you the green light–until then, you’ll sit on the shelf.

Applying the precautionary principle seems reasonable enough, especially when the risk that the USDA is about to gamble with is for no other purpose than… cosmetics. That’s right. The Arctic Apple is genetically-engineered to NOT turn brown. It’s designed to sell well not thanks to its improved nutritional value (it has none), but because it will be able to age and bruise while still looking young, fresh and vibrant in the produce aisle.

If those are not reasons enough to tell the USDA to NOT deregulate this Canadian invention, check here for more arguments why the plan is truly a terrible idea.

Chime in fast through this petition: the USDA’s public comments period ends Monday, December 16.

Read more: Blogs, Children, Family, Food, News & Issues, The Green Plate, ,

have you shared this story yet?

go ahead, give it a little love

Laetitia Mailhes

Laetitia Mailhes is a French-born journalist. After many years as the technology and innovation correspondent of the French "Financial Times" in San Francisco, she decided to focus on what truly matters to her: sustainable food and farming. Find more articles and videos on her blog, The Green Plate Blog.


+ add your own
4:03AM PDT on Oct 29, 2014


3:49AM PDT on Aug 29, 2014

Thank you :)

5:48AM PDT on Jul 4, 2014

Thank you :)

1:50AM PST on Dec 30, 2013


9:50AM PST on Dec 29, 2013


6:52AM PST on Dec 28, 2013


5:50AM PST on Dec 28, 2013


11:08AM PST on Dec 27, 2013

Thanks for posting.

8:17PM PST on Dec 26, 2013

Thank you.

8:15PM PST on Dec 26, 2013

Thank you.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

people are talking

Good and interesting information.

Native is always best. But easy to care for is great if that's all you have time for. It's better to…

such sweet friends, so cute!


Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!