The study, conducted by a group of researchers at the University of California, Davis, and in Japan suggests that the generally-accepted guidelines for sugar may be too lenient and should be reconsidered. The results of their study were reported online in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, and will appear in the journal’s October print edition.
“While there is evidence that people who consume large amounts of sugar are more likely to have heart disease or diabetes, it has been controversial as to whether high-sugar diets may actually promote these diseases,” said Kimber Stanhope, the study’s senior author and a research scientist at UC Davis.
“Our new findings demonstrate that several factors associated with an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease were increased in individuals who consumed 25 percent of their calories as fructose or high fructose corn syrup,” Stanhope added.
As described in the UC Davis news, the researchers examined 48 adult participants between the ages of 18 and 40 years. For five weeks before the study, subjects were asked to limit daily consumption of sugar-containing beverages to one 8-ounce serving of fruit juice. The participants were then divided into three groups, each group consuming 25 percent of their daily calories as fructose, high fructose corn syrup or glucose. The researchers found that within two weeks, study participants consuming fructose or high fructose corn syrup exhibited increased bloodstream concentrations of three known risk factors for heart disease: LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and a protein known as apolipoprotein-B, which can lead to plaque buildup in arteries.
The American Heart Association recommends that people consume only five percent of their daily calories as added sugar. How much added sugar do you consume?
Read more: Diabetes, Diet & Nutrition, Eating for Health, Health, Heart & Vascular Disease, High Blood Pressure
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may
not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Leave them alone and don't expect them to behave. That's normal.
Yes! Yes! Yes!
Thank you.
Eatting what we have eaten for ever is not the problem. The problem is the factory farming that uses…
very cool.
70 comments
+ add your ownI don't ADD sugar to anything. I'm too busy to bake, so the sweet treats are for special occasions only, and most of the time, it's in form of the Thanksgiving apple pie.
Only in rare instances such as making stir fry that I use a tsp of sugar to balance the soy sauce. But we don't even eat much pancakes, much less anything that requires sugar. We eat oatmeal with bananas. I get cereals that are healthy, such as honey bunches of oats, and don't use extra sugar, because it's already naturally sweetened with honey.
We're trying to lose weight.
thanks
thanks for the article
Helpful thanx
If I understand correctly from the results of the study, glucose did not increase bloodstream concentrations of the three known risk factors for heart disease, therefore there is no necessity to restrict glucose intake........
Come on get real you call this a "study."
Stevia should be cosumed instead of sugar, it is a natural sweetener.
pure raw suger cane suger is as toxic as the table suger? lots of nature things are toxic, but suger cane is natural.
thank you for the article
so probably 100 - 125 calories from sweets or soft drinks. sounds manageable as long as you're eating a diet rich in fresh fruits, vegetables, and whole grains, and make water (or gatorade occasionally if you're an athlete) your drink of choice.
What is more important: the health of Americans, or the profits of the companies that make corn syrup, sugar, and processed foods? It is clear to me which is more important to the U.S. government.
login to add your comment
use your care2 login
add your comment
20