New Zealand Grants a River the Rights of Personhood

By Stephen Messenger, TreeHugger

From the dawn of history, and in cultures throughout the world, humans have been prone to imbue Earth’s life-giving rivers with qualities of life itself — a fitting tribute, no doubt, to the wellsprings upon which our past (and present) civilizations so heavily rely. But while modern thought has come to regard these essential waterways more clinically over the centuries, that might all be changing once again.

Meet the Whanganui. You might call it a river, but in the eyes of the law, it has the standings of a person.

In a landmark case for the Rights of Nature, officials in New Zealand recently granted the Whanganui, the nation’s third-longest river, with legal personhood “in the same way a company is, which will give it rights and interests.” The decision follows a long court battle for the river’s personhood initiated by the Whanganui River iwi, an indigenous community with strong cultural ties to the waterway.

Under the settlement, the river is regarded as a protected entity, under an arrangement in which representatives from both the iwi and the national government will serve as legal custodians towards the Whanganui’s best interests.

“Today’s agreement which recognises the status of the river as Te Awa Tupua (an integrated, living whole) and the inextricable relationship of iwi with the river is a major step towards the resolution of the historical grievances of Whanganui iwi and is important nationally,” says New Zealand’s Minister for Treaty for Waitangi Negotiations, Christopher Finlayson.

“Whanganui Iwi also recognise the value others place on the river and wanted to ensure that all stakeholders and the river community as a whole are actively engaged in developing the long-term future of the river and ensuring its wellbeing,” says Finlayson.

Although this is likely the first time a single river has been granted such a distinction under the law, chances are it’s not the last. In 2008, Ecuador passed similar ruling giving its forests, lakes, and waterways rights on par with humans in order to ensure their protection from harmful practices.

And, while it may seem an odd extension of rights, in many ways it hearkens back to a time when mankind’s fate was more readily acknowledged as being intertwined with that of the rivers, lakes, and streams that sustained us — a time in which our purer instincts towards preserving nature needn’t be dictated by legislation.

Photo Credit: Felix Engelhardt [CC-BY-2.0], via Wikimedia Commons



World’s Rivers Threatened by Human Impacts
New Orleans Could be Powered by River Energy
Radioactive Fish Found in Vermont

Love This? Never Miss Another Story.


Mari Garcia
Mari Garcia3 years ago

I find giving a river a state of personhood ridiculous, but I'm glad the river is protected.

Ajla C.
Past Member 3 years ago


Shelly Peterson
Shelly Peterson3 years ago


Holly Lawrence
Holly Lawrence3 years ago


Neda E.
Neda E.3 years ago

I wish Chicago would follow suit with the river here. It's been violated so heavily (and I should know because it flows through my back-yard!) it really needs a respite from all we've done to it

John S.
Past Member 3 years ago

Interesting, thanks.

Rin S.
Rin S.3 years ago

Fascinating. Wow, thank you.

Mitchell D.
Mitchell D.3 years ago

I find this a great thing, and a wonderful direction in which we can continue to turn. It makes a lot more sense to me than corporate person hood!
I think we have suffered as a result of our blind estrangement from nature, and perhaps this will be part of a long term re-connection.

Jenny Grinstead
Jenny Grinstead3 years ago

I grew up in Whanganui, moved to Australia in 1982; and went back in 1993, 2003 and 2011. Each time, I have to climb the Memorial Tower to look out over the city and river views. I applaud the Whanganui Iwi in acting to care for this life source and entity of our city. Whanganui will always be home to me.

Lin Moy
Lin M3 years ago

I sent this to my N. Z. friend.