Butterfly Rewards - earn free credits and redeem for good causes -  learn more!
my care2
make a difference
healthy & green living: more than 5,000 ways to enhance your life

customize your free newsletter

Customize your Healthy & Green Living newsletter now


No Animal Testing? Deceptive Beauty Labels

posted by Mel, selected from Natural Solutions magazine Nov 8, 2009 11:01 am

By Maryann Hammers, Natural Solutions

The face cream smells delicious, feels gratifyingly luxurious, and promises to smooth out wrinkles. Best of all, the label reads “No Animal Testing.” Now you can be sure that no animals suffered or died to make this product. Right?

Wrong.

Despite what the label proclaims, this face cream, or any one of its ingredients, could easily have been rubbed into a bunny’s eyes, force-fed down a rat’s throat, or smeared over a guinea pig’s raw skin. Such practices continue at many cosmetic and skincare companies, even as the words “Not tested on animals” appear boldly on the labels.

“Consumers are shocked to learn that millions of animals each year are injected with or forced to inhale or ingest cosmetics. Those animals live in fear and loneliness every minute of their lives,” says Erin Edwards, media liaison for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, the animal-rights organization better known as PETA.

Wondering how companies get away with such brazen claims? Well, the label could mean that the company itself do no testing on animals, but instead hires a laboratory to do the dirty work. Or perhaps a company didn’t perform animal tests on that particular product, but it does on others. Clairol’s Herbal Essence shampoo label, for example, clearly notes, “Not tested on animals.” Meanwhile, according to PETA, the company continues to conduct animal testing on its other products. Even some companies that advertise their products as natural, organic, or vegan, still use ingredients tested on animals.

“Testing may be done by the suppliers, and a company may purchase ingredients with a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ philosophy. Or testing may occur by a parent company,” says Zibby Wilder, media relations director of the Animal Protection Institute. “So statements on the label may be literally correct to shield the company from public relations problems–yet quite disingenuous, if not downright deceptive.”

Reading between the labels
Since the label may not be telling the entire truth about testing, you need to do a certain amount of sleuthing to make sure you choose products that are 100 percent free of animal-tested ingredients (no matter who is doing the testing) and come from companies dedicated to that mission.

The good news? You can have your ethics, beauty indulgences, and an honorable relationship with the animal world–and it’s easier to do than even a few years ago. Many more conscientious organizations, manufacturers, spa owners, and consumers have established cruelty-free policies and have taken a stand against unnecessary testing.

PETA has compiled a list of companies that have signed a “Statement of Assurance” that they (and their suppliers) don’t and won’t test on animals. You’ll find major brands like Revlon, MAC, Avon, and Estee Lauder on the list, as well as natural favorites such as Kiss My Face and Aubrey Organics. (Download the guide at www.caringconsumer.com.)

“We started out 17 years ago with a wallet-sized pamphlet with only a handful of companies,” says Ann Marie Dori, coordinator of PETA’s Caring Consumer Project. “Today, it has grown to include more than 550 companies that don’t animal test their products.” Just as importantly, PETA also offers a guide listing companies that do test, including Cover Girl, L’Oreal, Olay, and Max Factor–so you can avoid them.

The Coalition for Consumer Information on Cosmetics (CCIC), which uses the Leaping Bunny name and logo, offers an animal-friendly shopping guide and also provides sample letters you can send to companies to urge them to stop animal testing. The coalition requires the companies it lists to prove that neither they, nor their suppliers, will conduct or commission animal tests during any stage of product development.

23 comments

23 comments

add your comment »
23 comments add your comment
Carol H.

You know anybody will lie to sell products they only way this will come to end is when the men and women stop buying these products that claim they are not tested on animals and the only way to make certain this is happening is visit where they produce the product and I mean the general public everyday because they will continue doing it if they are not watched 24/7 and that is a fact.

Eunice d.

Someone should sue them for lying and animal cruelty, because that is what they are essentially doing, even if it's indirectly.

Justin B.

I have noticed how some labels read "finished product not tested on animals" that means they could have tested all the ingredients that go into it, but not the finished product itself. I hate unethical corporations.

Valentina Garcia

Burts bees is now owned by Clorox? That is horrible. Animal testing in general is really bad.

Sandy and Tigger

Burt's Bees is now owned by Clorox.
Clorox; yes, that's right -- the bleach company with an estimated revenue of $ 4.8 billion that employs nearly 7,600 workers (now bees) and sells products like Liquid-Plumr, Pine-Sol and Armor All, a far cry from the origins of Burt.
The company was sold to Clorox in late October 2007 for $925 million.

Jennifer E.

I am currently using up my Burt's Bees products. Many of them do contain lanolin (a waxy substance from sheep wool). Commercial sheep are often sheared quickly and painfully though I admit I'm not sure how one goes about gathering the lanolin. I'd rather play it safe and avoid lanolin. Like everything else you have to read labels.

Kiraz Downey

Dear Megan, Paul Michell, Burt's Bees and Organix South are cruelty-free companies. Go to www.caringconsumer.com and click on the Support Cruelty-free companies link on the left hand side. Then you can search the company names in an alphabethical order. I just got a newsletter from PETA about an extremely cruel lab place in University of Utah. They got this cat for $15 from a shelter and put something through his head for the sake of "science". You can just see the thing sticking out of his head. The cat was in extreme pain and depression. That is an absolute torture. I am really upset. Just wanted to share with other animals lovers.

Kiraz Downey

Dear Ehren, stay away from Loreal for sure! Revlon is cruelty-free. Click the link I am attaching. Trust Peta's cruelty-free list and nothing else. Regards. http://search.caringconsumer.com/search_list_icons.aspx?Donottest=8&Product=0&Dotest=-1

Megan S.

yikes!
Can anyone please tell me about Paul Mitchell, Organix, and Burt's Bees???
I hope I haven't been supporting animal suffrage this whole time!
At least I don't wear make-up, so I have nothing to wrroy about there,

Ehren Clovis

I'm confused... this article cites Revlon as a "good" company in this particular aspect, and cites L'Oreal as a "bad" one. Yet I recently purchased "Shopping for a Better World," which says the opposite with regard to these 2 companies. Who should I believe??

Please enter your comment.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
1500 characters remaining

who's talking about this story?

Disclaimer: Care2.com does not warrant and shall have no liability for information provided in this newsletter or on Care2.com. Each individual person, fabric, or material may react differently to a particular suggested use. It is recommended that before you begin to use any formula, you read the directions carefully and test it first. Should you have any health care-related questions or concerns, please call or see your physician or other health care provider.

1013282

Copyright © 2009 Care2.com, inc. and its licensors. All rights reserved