START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

No New Freeways?

No New Freeways?

A study from the Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium (OTREC) has concluded that building more freeways in metropolitan areas that are congested can actually make traffic jams worse, and that a no-freeways approach to traffic engineering and urban planning can be better for people and the environment. Of the alternative approach to new freeway building, the authors say, “From a practical perspective, a no-more-freeway policy can relieve transportation funds for other potentially more effective usages, such as improving urban arterial street system, improving transit level of service and coverage, implementing demand management and pricing strategies, and facilitating more efficient land use patterns (e.g. high density in-fill and transit-oriented developments).” (Source:

Building more freeways to address existing traffic problems is a short-term solution, that can be very expensive and actually contribute to bigger issues in the long-term. For example, in 1900 there were 149 miles of paved roads in the United States, and now there are about 4 million.  Cities like San Francisco, Portland and New York have all removed well-trafficked urban highways and seen improvements in congestion and quality of life.  In Seoul, Korea an urban highway was removed that had over 100,000 trips a day and yet there was less congestion when it was gone. The space it had been on was converted to a 1,000 acre farm with a restored stream. Summer temperatures were lower because there wasn’t a massive amount of concrete to absorb sunlight and stay hot, and there were more plants to improve air quality.

If the default mentality is to build more freeways and not light rail or new bus lines, taxpayers wind up footing enormously costly projects that produce dubious results and sometimes add to the problems. In Seattle, an aging highway has been considered for removal or replacement. Replacing it could cost billions and take years. Cary Moon, who opposes the new highway said, “If you try to build your way out of congestion, you’ll ruin your city or go broke trying.”  (Source:

An unfinished freeway in Milwaukee would have cost $100 million to complete but was removed for $25 million. Using the new space more wisely resulted in $300 million in development investments.

Another potential benefit is that less animals are killed in vehicle accidents, if there are fewer drivers and highways.

Image Credit: Public Domain

Related Links
SUVs May be Banned in Paris
7 Electric Cars over 100 Years Old

Read more: Community, Community Service, Do Good, Life, Make a Difference, News & Issues, Transportation,

have you shared this story yet?

go ahead, give it a little love


+ add your own
10:25PM PDT on Jun 20, 2011


2:33PM PDT on Jun 20, 2011

I love it! I say we start riding bicycles, carpools, walking, etc....! Not only is it good for us (riding bikes, walking) But it is great for our environment as well! The part about the cement making it hotter also makes sense as well as the increase in traffic (not to mention all the auto accidents) so I say NO more freeways and lets get rid of some we have! I am so sick of all the vehicles on the road!

8:50AM PDT on Jun 20, 2011

Thanks sending to my friends tghat are planners

4:42PM PDT on Jun 19, 2011

This article raises some points that I hadn't thought of. Seems sensible...although it's hard for me to know about urban engineering & transportation, since I've never been trained in it.

3:30PM PDT on Jun 19, 2011

Interesting. TY.

It makes sense that if there were less roads, people would use more mass transit as well.

12:36PM PDT on Jun 19, 2011


5:19AM PDT on Jun 19, 2011

It all sounds good to me especially the part about less heat and less animals killed.

8:48AM PDT on Jun 18, 2011

Lynn Allen, what if you live in an area where there is literally no public transportation or you have a job that has weird hours? Kinda hard to find a carpool when you work, say, the midnight shift. And where we live (rural county) the public buses don't come out to our town and the cabs are ruinously expensive to a person on a blue-collar paycheck (try a minimum of 20 bucks ONE-WAY!).

I've got nothing against getting rid of the freeways in the big city areas, but they need to find alternatives as well for the commuters. Funny how near us they're hollering about expanding the highways, but are sitting on their butts about improving public transportation options. In the DC-Metro area, they're touting the Inter-County Connector (ICC), but something tells me they're not going to get as much action on that because they're making it a TOLL ROAD. What blue-collar worker can afford the tolls they're asking for it?

Sounds like their priorities need to be rearranged.

11:02AM PDT on Jun 17, 2011


10:44AM PDT on Jun 17, 2011

thanks for sharing!

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

people are talking

*sigh* This article is very "light" on the writing end. You don't actually make your point...or …

Thanks for sharing

I just wouldn't feel right without exercising. I'm an old fart, and I've been active my whole life. …

I'm perfecting my howl also.

Thanks for the alert.


Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!