START A PETITION 27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

Sex Shot: The Safety and Ethics of the HPV Vaccine

Sex Shot: The Safety and Ethics of the HPV Vaccine

What could be more awkward than the discussion of pre-adolescent sex and cancer? Well specifically talk of the human papilloma virus (also known as HPV), which serves as the viral cause of most cervical cancers, is one of the more awkward and difficult subjects for parents, doctors and children alike.

Over the past few years, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended that girls in pre-adolescence (around 11 or 12) receive the HPV vaccine (Gardasil) to protect them against particular strains of the virus known to cause cervical cancer. The idea is that if young girls are vaccinated prior to engaging in sexual activity (this is assuming that the vast majority of girls under the age of 12 have yet to have sex) they will avoid exposure to potentially lethal strains of HPV that are transmitted sexually (interesting note: it appears as if the makers of Gardasil are hard at work on a comparable vaccine intended for boys to help protect them from genital warts and other forms of cancer).

Recent news has revealed that along with parents who remain leery of a pre-adolescent vaccine for young girls, doctors are less than confident about administering the vaccine for many reasons. One of the sticking points is the question of how long the vaccine will remain effective once administered, and if it is advisable to administer a vaccine to an 11-year old who may not become sexually active until she is 16, well after the point where the vaccine would be most effective. To add to the general concern, the CDC has reported at least two deaths among young girls possibly related to the vaccine, and other doctors have voiced their apprehension about neurological problems related to the vaccine.

In addition, there is the whole hornets nest of highly emotional and moral issues surrounding a vaccine that presumes an active sex life for an adolescent girl. Needless to say, many parents have expressed moral outrage (as well as medical concern) when it comes to compulsory HPV vaccines for their girls. Some have seen this as license for, or a tacit approval of, unchecked teenage sexual shenanigans. Others worry that a vaccine of this sort will provide a false confidence among adolescents that they are somehow protected from sexually transmitted diseases.

While I am hardly a fervent advocate of wholesale vaccinations for everyone, I do see the potential value of a vaccine that is both safe and effective. However, we rarely have the luxury of both of these qualities wrapped up in one anodyne package. I assume people will remain vocal about the use (or lack thereof) of HPV vaccines until something radically shifts in the public consciousness or in the quality of the vaccine–or both.

I would love to hear from readers regarding this issue of HPV vaccines. Has anyone had to make this decision for his or her child? Do you feel it is ethical to have compulsory vaccines of this regard? Is there something inappropriate about vaccinating a young child against a potentially sexually transmitted disease? Should more testing be done before we start handing out “sex shots?”

Eric Steinman is a freelance writer based in Rhinebeck, N.Y. He regularly writes about food, music, art, architecture and culture and is a regular contributor to Bon Appétit among other publications.

Read more: Children, Family, Love, Parenting at the Crossroads, Sex, , , , , , , , ,

have you shared this story yet?

go ahead, give it a little love

Eric Steinman

Eric Steinman is a freelance writer based in Rhinebeck, NY. He regularly writes about food, music, art, architecture, and culture and is a regular contributor to Bon Appétit among other publications.


+ add your own
5:48AM PDT on Sep 12, 2012

Well said, Nimue!

6:56AM PDT on Apr 21, 2012

i find any arguments against this vaccine because it will encourage sexual activity to be self serving and in of itself immoral. The premise is that it takes away some of the dangers of sexual activity, thereby that encourages engaging in sex. That might be true but the idea behind is to keep the risks of sex so you can say sex is risky and that is what i find self serving. The immoral part is the implication that your daughter should risk dying slowly and miserably from cancer if she does engage in sex.

8:30PM PDT on Apr 19, 2012

thanks :)

7:47PM PDT on Apr 18, 2012

I don't think it should be compulsory, but educate the kids about this, as well as safe sex practices.

1:37PM PST on Nov 16, 2011


1:36PM PST on Nov 16, 2011


5:59AM PDT on Jul 13, 2011

I think it is necessary today.

5:41PM PDT on Apr 8, 2011

Thanks for the article.

4:36PM PST on Jan 30, 2011

More power to you Ms. Cooper ! Regardless of how one may think about sex for teens or premarital or whatever, your daughter shouldn't have to pay for such a, "trangression", with her life.

1:37PM PDT on Aug 26, 2010

Has anyone heard of any medical studies I can get in to that will give the HPV vaccine to women in their 30's? Every doctor I have asked said that they absolutely will not give it to me, despite the high rates of cervical cancer and similar cancers in my family.

add your comment

Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of
Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.

people are talking

Thanks for reminding me. Turmeric is not a traditional spice and I forget to include it in cooking.…

Thanks for sharing.

Thank you for info, very interesting! Thank you! :-)

#8 is what lazy & selfish people do: "solving" a problem by making it someone else's problem. My…


Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.