How is Coke Fighting Obesity?

If you were to informally poll reasonably informed Americans about what exactly were the causes of the lasting obesity epidemic in this country, more pointedly, who in the world of corporate foods was to blame, the list would probably be something like McDonald’s, Hostess, and probably Coca-Cola.

The logic around this has to do with something to do with the fact that these companies (and there are many others guilty of the same thing) peddle all sorts of calorie-dense, nutritionally-vacant, goods that American love just a bit too much. These products are leaving people fat, unhealthy and riddled with health problems including obesity. While McDonald’s is holding on to its bit of fast food market share, and Hostess is being dissolved like a Twinkie in a nuclear holocaust, Coca-Cola is doing what it can to mitigate the PR disaster that is our nationís current obsession with health and obesity.

The way the Coca-Cola Company is addressing this is with a persuasive new public service advertisement that positions the company as fighting alongside concerned Americans as a sort of brother-in-arms. With this new ad, the company offers up the idea that it is providing “solutions” to the current obesity epidemic with their diet drink portfolio, charitable contributions to fitness programs and by insisting that if you take in more calories than you burn, you will gain weight.

They attempt to equal the caloric playing field with this statement, “All calories count. No matter where they come from, including Coca-Cola and everything else with calories.” This statement implies that a fistful of almonds or celery is just as good as a 12-ounce can of Coke, as long as you exert the energy to burn off the calories consumed. (See the advertisement above.)

The one of many problems with this corporate logic is the convenient glossing over of what constitutes a nutrient-rich calorie, and what is just an empty calorie. To be sure, a serving of Coke is the definition of empty calories.

Sure there are other problems with this sort of feel-good, ďwe are all on the same teamĒ propaganda, and I am willing to give the Coca-Cola Company some credit for not wholly ignoring the issue, but arenít they just really serving their own interests on this one? Couldnít they do more to clean up their product line, offer some real nutrition, and promote healthy living outside of their corporate interests? What are your thoughts on this new campaign?

56 comments

Norma V.
Norma Villarreal4 years ago

"Things go better with Coke." Hmmm.

SEND
Yulan Lawson
Yulan Lawson4 years ago

They're not trying to do anything but sell more product. In Australia they're trying to stop us from having a national return the can system.

SEND
Paul Girardin
Paul Girardin4 years ago

Thanks for sharing!

SEND
Aud Nordby
Aud n4 years ago

thanks

SEND
Winn Adams
Winn Adams4 years ago

Drinking any kind of soda is bad for your health.

SEND
Teresa Wlosowicz
Teresa W4 years ago

Just like drunks fight alcohol?

SEND
Jacqueline S.
Jacqueline S4 years ago

People, PLEASE! Regulate yourself. Personally, I prefer tap water. MY CHOICE!

SEND
Ravens Watch
Past Member 4 years ago

Did you know that Coca-Cola is 122 years old?

No wonder it has been starting to taste bad!

SEND
Christine Jones
Christine J4 years ago

I enjoy Coke and other soft drinks, but I limit them to the occasional treat, and make my main drink plain tap water. The zero sugar soft drinks taste foul IMO, so I'd rather have the occasional real soft drink than guzzle sugar free drinks all day. It is not Coke's job to stop us getting fat. It is our job to take responsibility for our own choices.

SEND
Mari Garcia
Mari Garcia4 years ago

Something is better than nothing

SEND