Thursday January 5, 2012, 10:18 pm
That church is more JESUS-like than most and I salute them! In an all-inclusive gesture, they expressed an idea on their own property....and exposed themselves to the "righteous" who are apparently determined to demonstrate that it's fine to VANDALIZE FOR JESUS!
Monday January 9, 2012, 2:53 pm
W.T.F DO GAY COUPLES HAVE TO DO WITH THE NATIVITY?!?!?!?! IT IS NOT ONLY HISTORICALLY INACCURATE,IT IS SACRELIGE! I DON'T GIVE A F*** WHAT HOMOSEXUALS DO IN THEIR BEDROOMS! I DON'T BROADCAST MY SEX LIFE IN THE COMMUNITY,OR,WORSE YET,IN A NATIVITY SCENE! ALL I ASK FOR IS THE SAME COURTESY!
Tuesday January 10, 2012, 9:16 am
Bobbi, until you take your relationship status off your profile, stop talking about me "broadcasting my sex life."
Everybody who complains that the Nativity has nothing to do with gays needs to actually read what was going on.
It wasn't like they made a "Gay Nativity" with gay Joseph and a man Mary or whatever weird fantasy you're coming up with. It's an inclusive church that was making a point that they are an inclusive church. You can rattle all you want about gays having "nothing to do with the Nativity," but the point was never the Nativity, it's that they were trying to show that they were inclusive with an inclusive display and homophobes wrecked it.