Start A Petition

Feds to Start Over on Wolf Plan Analysis! OUTRAGIOUS! Delaying Until JUNE 2014!?!?!

Animals  (tags: Wolves, Getting SHAFTED!, society, slaughter, killing, killed, suffering, wildlife, humans, ethics, animals, cruelty, crime, environment, protection, animalcruelty, animalwelfare, abuse, animalrights, habitat, investigation, law, conservation, abused, enda )

- 1738 days ago -
It's unclear whether the delay will affect the timetable for making a final decision on removing wolf protections, which is expected by June 2014, he said

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Roxie H (350)
Tuesday August 20, 2013, 11:44 pm

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. (AP) — A federal agency is delaying an independent analysis of a plan to drop legal protections for wolves across most of the nation because of concerns about the selection of experts to conduct the review, an official said Tuesday.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in June called for removing gray wolves across the Lower 48 states from the endangered species list, with an exception for the struggling Mexican wolf in the Southwest. Agency director Dan Ashe said the wolf had recovered to the point that it could thrive and even enlarge its territory without federal oversight, although some advocates and members of Congress said the move was premature.

The law requires that a team of scientists evaluate the basis for such a proposal before a final decision is made. The agency hired a private contractor to select and oversee the peer review panel, which is standard procedure to make sure the analysis meets standards for quality and independence, spokesman Gavin Shire said.

The agency isn’t supposed to know who the panelists are, Shire said. But the contractor provided a list of candidates that redacted their names but included their professional resumes, which would have enabled the agency to determine their identity, he said.

“What we’re doing now is going back and re-examining the process,” Shire said. “We’ve put everything on hold until we’ve had time to decide how best to proceed.”

The move also came after the contractor notified three scientists who were under consideration that their services wouldn’t be required. They were among 16 experts who signed a May 21 letter to Interior Secretary Sally Jewell that challenged a draft version of the gray wolf plan. The letter said the wolf has “just begun to recover in some regions and not at all in others.”

Shire said he didn’t have the names of the three scientists. But the Center for the Biological Diversity, an advocacy group that favors continued federal protection for wolves, identified them as John Vucetich of Michigan Technological University, Robert Wayne of UCLA, and Roland Kays of North Carolina State University.

“Unfortunately, this is but one example of how the Fish and Wildlife Service has been twisting the scientific process to get the desired political result of no more protections for wolves,” said Brett Hartl, the center’s endangered species policy director.

Vucetich and Wayne told The Associated Press they had received e-mails from the contractor saying they were being excluded from the review team because they had signed the letter. Kays said he had been “solicited as a possible panelist” but later told he wouldn’t be needed.

Vucetich, a biologist and wolf specialist, said it was “absolutely wrong” to disqualify an expert from a peer review team because of previous statements about a proposed policy. Any competent scientist will approach such an assignment with an open mind and be willing to alter his or her opinion if new information justifies it, he said.

“As a professional, I’ve changed my mind on many occasions,” Vucetich said. “I make a living out of collecting new data.”

Shire declined comment on the dealings with the three scientists, saying the matter was under review. But he said the Fish and Wildlife Service “wanted to be particularly sure that the people we got for this process were objective and unbiased” because the wolf is such a “highly polarizing subject.”

The contract with the outside firm has been canceled and the peer review procedure will start over, Shire said. It’s unclear whether the delay will affect the timetable for making a final decision on removing wolf protections, which is expected by June 2014, he said.

Roxie H (350)
Tuesday August 20, 2013, 11:45 pm
We need to PROTEST THIS! otherwise ALL THE HUNTS REMAIN and we are screwed this year!

Wednesday August 21, 2013, 12:22 am
noted with hope...
Thank you, Roxy.

Frances Darcy (133)
Wednesday August 21, 2013, 12:22 am

Mandy A (86)
Wednesday August 21, 2013, 1:03 pm
This is terrible news, must get them re-listed sooner then next year!

Mandy A (86)
Wednesday August 21, 2013, 1:03 pm
500 error -_-

Mike H (252)
Thursday August 22, 2013, 3:21 pm
This is just ignorant

Sheila D (194)
Thursday August 22, 2013, 3:32 pm
Meanwhile the hunting and trapping go on...?

Elisa F (235)
Thursday August 22, 2013, 3:39 pm
Idiotic move on their part... I'm still hopeful though. Noted. Thank you, Roxy.

Razzbarry F (26)
Thursday August 22, 2013, 4:12 pm
We will lose 1000 or more wolves because of this federal govt this year again! This is unreal, what a bunch of crap!

Michael M (60)
Thursday August 22, 2013, 4:16 pm
Vucetich, Wayne, and Keys are well-known wolf researchers whose work shows that wolves are not yet sufficiently reestablished to make removal from Endangered Species Act protections appropriate.

Their blacklisting (government sources, now being investigated, sent their names to the panel of scientific peer reviewers of the coming proposal, to give input on its wisdom and validity.) was profoundly corrupt, and I have sent several letters asking for investigation before it was determined that one is necessary.

No decision for the proposal on delisting nationally can be made without peer review.
Roxy says. Outrageous! What she means is the corruption exposed by discovery of the three-name memo asking them to be removed from consideration as peer reviewers.

I hope you ALL are outraged by the complete corruption of wolf management in the US and the worse corruption of politicisation in the individual states which at this point have control of this vital native species.

Understand that rampant corruption has been the practice in this government in ALL spheres, and YOU must demand an end to it.

Michael M (60)
Thursday August 22, 2013, 4:18 pm
Wolves cannot be delisted until this investigation is complete, and public input and peer review is then undertaken.

This gives YOU more time to bone up and keep writing to protect the wolf.

(or you can whine and mumble on care2 instead. This place is for information exchange, and you must take that and make use of it where it can COUNT)

Michael M (60)
Thursday August 22, 2013, 4:22 pm
I'm using the word You here to mean We (, and do NOT refer to Roxy, a tireless and long=term activist and participant in saving the wolf, the other animals and environments necessary for health, love, diversity.

She also is an advocate for Native North American peoples, whose traditions we might find to be the only valid ways of living on Earth.

B Lewenza (76)
Thursday August 22, 2013, 5:37 pm
WE have to fight this,but the question is how when they are not playing fair in the first place.? They are stacking their deck against the wolves.

Steve S (70)
Thursday August 22, 2013, 7:17 pm
Totally corrupt govt. and time to get in the woods with us, stop the wolf killers!

Dwain La'Brooy (331)
Friday August 23, 2013, 1:36 am
.•°¤*(¯`★´¯)*¤° ɲ๏ţ€ď. ţhąɲЌ$ я๏ж¥! °¤*(¯´★`¯)*¤°•.

Danuta W (1249)
Friday August 23, 2013, 2:49 am

Franshisca Dearmas (89)
Friday August 23, 2013, 8:55 am
Noted and signed. TY

Leslene Dunn (84)
Monday August 26, 2013, 1:05 am
Noted - I am so horrified I don't even want to comment.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Animals

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.