START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

The Rick Simpson Story, Hemp Medicine, Cures All Diseases. -


Health & Wellness  (tags: the Rick Simpson Story, Hemp Medicine, Cures All Diseases. cancer is gone Pt1, scott shaubel, love, christ, save our earth, photons, queen, nwo )

Scott
- 2119 days ago - node5-www.care2.com
After a serious head injury, Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil, cured cancers and other illnesses, curing and controlling hundreds of people's illness.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Scott Shaubel (816)
Thursday October 2, 2008, 4:35 am

Series (Part 1 of 7)



VIEW ALL 7 FILES AT http://... (more)
Added: February 10, 2008
Series (Part 1 of 7)

VIEW ALL 7 FILES AT http://www.youtube.com/chrychek

A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997, Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other illnesses, he tried to share it with as many people as he could free of charge - curing and controlling literally hundreds of people's illnesses... but when the story went public, the long arm of the law snatched the medicine - leaving potentially thousands of people without their cancer treatments - and leaving Rick with unconsitutional charges of possessing and trafficking marijuana!

Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who were not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court of Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007... INCLUDING A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL!

IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE!
 

Past Member (0)
Thursday October 2, 2008, 6:41 pm
Only natural remedies ever prove useful for cures. Yet people dont know this, they assume just because someone says; Ive tried that it doesnt work.
Doesnt mean its true.
You have to see it yourself to understand what is and what is not true. Continuing to believe in rumors only leads to their demise.
 

Joan Mclaughlin (133)
Thursday October 2, 2008, 7:05 pm
I hope people wise up.I made it through ovarian cancer.But I don't know if I would've had the gumption to survive without an illegal substance,marijuana.I lost so much weight my doctors were worried when I went below 110lbs.I was told that they wanted me to go on Iv for nutrition.Needless to say I didn't.The drug companies have to much money invested in their stock not the patients welfare.
 

Anumpeshi Aduddell (227)
Thursday October 2, 2008, 9:40 pm
We would not be ill today if we were to use all mother natures remedies!Anumpeshi,But mankind has forgotten whom he is!
 

Past Member (0)
Friday October 3, 2008, 9:51 am
In addition the natural remedies as in plants and earth minerals, being vegan also proves one avoids the illnesses. As some people already know vegans only eat what grows from the earth, not animals or anything to do with animals whatsoever. But those that are not vegan most of the population that eats meat and or dairy have shown the tell tale signs something is wrong with them because of all those illnesses and diseases.

Natures remedies is actually our diet, our food, our way of life. The sods dont want people to realize that. The higher ups dont want people to think, they want people to depend on whats avalable to them such as the animal products such as meat, dairy and of course the damn pharmacy treatments and those drugs that are supposedly meant to cure illnesses.
Those treatments, drugs, pills, and of course even surgery have proven before as well as now that none of them are reliable because they are all not actually based on human health since they are not based on humans to start with. And its proven by side effects, bad reactions to drugs, feeling sore or sick afterwards despite feeling like that to start with!

If one asks how many vegans there are you get an answer like; not many or a very few or a 0.2%.
But if you ask have any ever been ill from their diet you get the answer; not one of them. So to counter that realization rumors are spread out to suggest to people we need supplements to "make up for our diets". RUBBISH!
I have been vegan for 7 years and not once have I ever taken anything to "make up for my diet".
But people will believe rumors, they believe those rumors because those people dont actually know the facts, only what they are told.
The Wiccan folks they know something and the trully devoted Wiccans live on not a single animal product, and they also never become ill.

The Wiccans take their knowledgefrom the ancient Pagans and of course they too never ate animals only what grew from the earth. Many rumors have been intentionally spread out that Pagans and Wiccans ate meat, that is absolute lie generated to throw people off yet again from natures path, as in to keep us all confused enough to depend on what those industries provide instead.

Bring back the hemp but dont bother asking the governments or the politions or any authoritarian because they dont care for many reasons. Their roles are to keep the natural remedies away from people. Whatever keeps people healthy they dont want people to know.
That crap about marijuana being an illegal substance, drug or people getting high will not fool me because the only real illegal drugs are the ones generated by the pharmaceutical industries. But they are legal and people buy them all because they believe they help them.

We all live in a sick controlled society thats no better than back then. Back then, way back then all those diseases were not known as people did not cause them in the first place. But humans along the way were misled and now what we live in is an utter mess of confusion and multiple views on one persons say verses another person.

People are causing their own illnesses, people I know or people I hear about go into surgery to have things removed such as ulcers or tumors, then they come out and complain at one point they are feeling worse, they go back in only to have the docters say they copuld not find anything wrong with them!
So they go to another doctor the doctor has a look inside with a camera and still finds nothing wrong with them, and then one day that friend of mine had to go into the hospital because he was in agony and it turned out despite the doctor before who had a look inside found no signs of anything wrong but the doctors who had a look at him now found a really bad ulcer that was was going to burst.
He could have died. Doctors dont know what they are trained for, they look in books, they only learn what their lecturers tell them.
That friend of mine is also a meat eater. He caused his own illness, he bought and ate what he buys at the shop. He is on tablets now but if he stops taking those tablets he gets worse again.

So what does that tell you about pharmaceuticals? They are not remedies, they only block the effects of what you cause yourself.
His stomach is weakened thanks to what he eats, he depends on tablets he doesnt care because he does not want to care, he just takes his tablets and gets on with his life.

Some life that is eh? Depending on the money makers who did not cure him, the ones that lied to him, the ones that decieve him.

I still see and read about peoples complaints of their meds or illnesses and the fact they take other meds to counter their other illnesses.

SO if anyone thinks the natural remedies do not work just think about what Ive typed above because thats all true and you dont have to take my words for it have a look around and people are not getting better now are they!
 

Goddess Lozz (213)
Friday October 3, 2008, 10:05 am
I have a friend who went into hospital last week to have a tumour removed from his lower regions, he also had to have a temporary catheter inserted into his veins and all without aneasthetic because he chose not to have it, he felt fine when he came out but a few days later he complained of pains so he had to go back in, they said he had very low blood pressure and internal bleeding! Whatever they did was wrong and had a bad effect on him, he was in overnight then discharged, he told me they didn't know what was wrong with him! I mean wtf!? All they gave him was something to keep him doped up all the time, obviously to cover up the pain and not do anything to cure it! He is still suffering from a bad head 2 days later and feels awful.
Shroedinger is right, these so called doctors don't even know what they are doing, they just assume something then just fob you off with drugs that are dangerous!
 

. (0)
Friday October 3, 2008, 4:49 pm
The title’s claim that hemp medicine “cures all diseases” I think can safely be said to be hyperbolic. There is no known medicine which cures “all diseases.”

And I would be interested to see the scientific studies and credible evidence that hemp oil “cures cancer”, as is stated in the description beneath the title.

However, there certainly seem to be some potential medical benefits to the use of hemp oil.

Andrew Weil, M.D. states,

“Adding these foods [hemp oil] to the diet seems to lower risks of heart attacks because omega-3 fatty acids reduce the clotting tendency of the blood and improve cholesterol profiles. They also have a natural anti-inflammatory effect that makes them useful for people with arthritis and autoimmune disorders.” http://www.ratical.org/renewables/TherapHoil.html

John Russo, PharmD, states,

“Hemp oil is one of the few oils that contains measurable levels of gamma-linolenic acid, an omega-6 fatty acid that is synthesized in healthy persons from linoleic acid. Supplementation with gamma-linolenic acid may be useful in treating atopic eczema, premenstrual syndrome, diabetic neuropathy and arthritis in patients in which this synthesis process is impaired (Leson, et al., 1999). (Note: Hemp seeds from which the oil is extracted are legal in the United States as long as they are sterilized to prevent germination.)

Hemp oil may have a role as part of a dietary strategy to lower the risk of heart attacks because omega-3 fatty acids have potent anti-inflammatory effects, may be antiatherogenic and may help to lower elevated serum triglyceride levels (O'Keefe and Harris, 2000; von Schacky, 2000; Ponte, et al., 1997).

Other inflammatory conditions that may benefit from the essential fatty acid composition of omega-3 sources (such as hemp oil) include psoriasis, acne and osteoporosis (Heller, et al., 1998; Mayser, et al., 1998).” http://medcomres.com/articles/hemp_fat.htm

Sounds very much as though hemp oil may well be a useful treatment for a limited number of conditions. Obviously more research needs to be performed in this area.
 

Past Member (0)
Friday October 3, 2008, 6:39 pm
"(Note: Hemp seeds from which the oil is extracted are legal in the United States as long as they are sterilized to prevent germination.)"

Steralized to keep the money makers happy. If they are not steralized people can grow them, which burdens the money making scum such as big pharma.

A free and good thing such as hemp is bad for business for big pharma.

Not "may be useful", it is useful otherwise it would not be so tightly controlled let alone that crap excuse about the illegal drug use of hemp to get high.

Noone has actually died from using hemp, its not a threat to humans as it never proved to be so. As Scott has provided before hemp is not just on the health side of things but also on other uses such as the earlier times when hemp was used in many ways. A usefull and reliable plant.

No surprise there then.
 

. (0)
Friday October 3, 2008, 7:50 pm
And the statement made earlier that "only natural remedies prove useful for cures" obviously cannot be true. Too many people have been cured of too many diseases and illnesses by pharmaceuticals to support that statement. Not every drug can cure - some only ameliorate the symptoms or aid in recovery. And some may do nothing positive for some individuals. And some may even do harm.

But some do, in fact, cure.

The effects of so many pharmaceuticals have been thoroughly tested in double-blind clinical studies. And the results are there for all to see: the number of people in the control group (who did not receive the drug) who recovered vs. the number of people who actually received the drug and recovered. And when the people receiving the drug recovered more often than those in the control group - that is clinical proof of a drug's efficacy.
 

. (0)
Friday October 3, 2008, 8:19 pm

Concerning the cure made possible by modern pharmaceuticals, just one disease makes the case for the benefits of modern medicine.

Leprosy has existed throughout recorded history. It has been a major and terrifying scourge. And, although “natural” remedies have always abounded literally throughout thousands of years, there was no effective cure for leprosy until the 1940’s – when modern pharmaceuticals took over.

Today, leprosy is estimated to be perhaps 95% curable with modern drugs. And even that small 5% or so who relapse nonetheless receive benefit from the drugs.

http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic1281.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leprosy
http://www.stanford.edu/class/humbio103/ParaSites2005/Leprosy/treatment.htm
 

Past Member (0)
Friday October 3, 2008, 9:52 pm
Your links are not prove of anything only more misleading pharmaceutical lies especially te mention of WHO that are are a vivisector group.

Pharmaceuticals NEVER cure illnesses or diseases. You are stating a false claim using false facts provided by notorious liars such as WHO.

You are backing vivisection which makes you instantly discredited and trully wrong in your claims.

Vivisection or animal testin is what you are backing and for the actual educated person knows for a fact animal experimentations are never reliable.

Only the human studies alone has proven effective and the natural remedies are also reliable if one knows which one to use.

Whereas the pharmaceuticals are only known to cause side effects and even death.
Pharmaceuticals only restrict ailments but never cure them. Only the person who takes them can be cured if that person takes care of themself as in their diet and the way they treat them self.

Shame on you for backing false claims.
 

. (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 5:27 am

Actually, the clinical studies I spoke of above where I talked of one control groupo getting a drug and one receiving a placebo specifically talked of "people" being used in the clinical trials. Because, of course, a clinical trial is by its very nature performed on people (unless, of course, we're talking about a veterinary medication). I was not specifically speaking of animal testing, which would come (in some cases) prior to the clinical trials/studies. A clinical trial/study is performed to see whether the drug actually works in humans.

And for those who believe "Whereas the pharmaceuticals are only known to cause side effects and even death": I trust that the next time you need a root canal, an appendectomy, surgery to pin a broken leg, or the like that you intend to refuse all anesthesia. Because anesthesia is, of course, a "pharmaceutical". And, according to your beliefs, "pharmaceuticals are only known to cause side effects and even death." And of course anesthesia doesn't really work anyway, does it? We all know that.....
 

Goddess Lozz (213)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 5:47 am
Vivisection is a fraud and nothing good has come out of animal experimentation.


http://www.vivisectionfraud.com/

A must see site for everyone!
 

. (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 5:58 am

The issue isn't whether vivisection helps provide information on a pharmaceutical. The issue I was discussing is clinical trials in humans. And whether or not pharmaceuticals work. And many, many pharmaceuticals have a brilliant track record of working very well indeed.

A show of hands from those who intend to refuse anesthesia should they ever require an appendectomy or other major surgery....
 

Past Member (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 12:30 pm
It is when you mention the links that refer to WHO.

Dive deeper into the deception that is the pharmaceutical industry.

Only the non animal tested treatments have ever worked as the animals were never used to try to find cures for humans.

When it comes to big pharma things get complex things get mixed up, people get misled and thats the whole point I am making about this. I wouldnt trust everything you read about big pharma. Like I said they are notorious liars and can easily mislead people by using words, terms and other technical jargon because noone actually knows what those sods really do and thats cover up facts or mix them up.

One thing I love doing is exposing liars and to expose them is research them and compare the modern pharmacy treatmnts to the natural treatments or remedies.

In every case the natural remedies allways outdo the pharmacy.
 

. (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 1:31 pm

"Only the non-animal tested treatments have ever worked." So if a drug goes straight to clinical trials without stopping for animal testing - then it has a chance of working. But if animal studies are done first - then it magically doesn't work?

Simply won't wash, I'm afraid.

It isn't just WHO which says they work. Or the big pharmaceutical companies. Or governments.

It's also physicians everywhere. And patients everywhere (including me.)

Disapproving of animal testing on its own merits is one thing. However, that disapproval should not be used to falsely discredit pharmaceuticals.

If you disapprove of animal testing - then fight it openly and honestly. Don't try to go in through the back door and make the incredible statement that any drug which is tested on animals must be ineffective. Because that is provably false.
 

. (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 1:55 pm

In fact, one of the greatest lifesaving drugs in history was tested on animals: penicillin.

"In one of the most well-known animal experiments in history, Sir Howard Florey and his associates infected eight mice with a lethal dose of Streptococci (the bacteria that causes scarlet fever and tonsillitis) at Oxford University in 1940. Four mice were given penicillin and the remaining four mice were left untreated. The four mice treated with penicillin survived while the 4 untreated ones perished. This single experiment with just eight mice clearly defined the value of penicillin and was used to save thousands of soldiers’ lives during World War II. Some historians believe that the use of penicillin probably influenced the outcome of the war. Sir Florey's experiment set the stage for our modern-day understanding of the use of antibiotics to treat infectious diseases. Click here and here for more about Sir Florey's Nobel Prize-winning work."http://www.amprogress.org/site/c.jrLUK0PDLoF/b.933657/k.923A/ANIMAL_RESEARCH.htm

The fact that penicillin was tested on animals obviously has not affected its usefulness in treating infection.


 

Past Member (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 2:13 pm
Wrong again Penecillin has a 2 sided story and I have some information on this somewhere and it did not prove effective from animal testing. You believe in vivisection so now Im going to prove you wrong again. You robot...
 

Goddess Lozz (213)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 2:17 pm
WTF!!!??? Lindsey have you not been on the vivisection fraud site yet? It clearly goes into detail about how animal testing has never proven to be effective.

You should also read this:

http://www.whale.to/v/disease3.html

and read about how the greek physician Hippocrates was all for natural healing.

http://www.sjsu.edu/depts/Museum/hippoc.html
 

Goddess Lozz (213)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 2:19 pm
Penicillin has been proven to be highly dangerous! I have info on this which I was reading the other day, I will find it and come back...
 

. (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 2:22 pm

I never said that penicillin was effective BECAUSE it had been tested on animals. In fact, I said previously that the issue of animal testing itself wasn't the issue. I merely stated that it WAS tested on animals.

I was using this to clearly refute your statement that "Only the non animal tested treatments have ever worked as the animals were never used to try to find cures for humans."

Obviously penicillin was tested on animals.

Obviously it has saved many lives - and works.

Therefore your statement, Shroedinger, is false - merely because a drug is tested on animals obviously does not mean that it doesn't work. Which should be a no-brainer to anyone.

I am not making any claim about whether or not the animal testing proved its worth - and I did not make any such claim. The issue of whether or not animal testing actually provides valuable insight into a drug is not the issue. The issue was, plainly and simply, your own statement.
 

. (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 2:25 pm

Nor did I ever say that penicillin does not have side effects, does not cause life-threatening allergic reactions in some patients, has not been one of the drugs to which bacteria have sometimes developed resistance, etc. That was never the issue. I was speaking solely about the fact that it actually has historically been proven to work.

No drug is perfect. No drug is ever 100% safe for everyone under every situation. No drug has 0 side effects. Even aspirin has side effects and doesn't work for everything.

Again, the issue was your own statement. Which has been firmly disproven.
 

Past Member (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 2:35 pm
http://www.health.org.nz/antib.html

Alright Lindsey have a read at that and dont bother denying it as it is "credible" information.

On the link proves animal yet again animal testing is fraudulent and that penecillin was not proven to be effective through animal testing but on humans alone.

If it was tested first on animals first for the results then there would be NO penecillin for use on humans as it says on the site the cays died because of it!
 

Past Member (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 2:35 pm
"If it was tested first on animals first for the results then there would be NO penecillin for use on humans as it says on the site the cays died because of it!"

I meant cats mispelled it.
 

. (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 2:46 pm

Shroedinger, you obviously don't actually read what I post.

I NEVER stated in this thread that the animal testing was accurate. I never said that penicillin was effective BECAUSE it was tested on animals. The quote above was a QUOTE (note the little quotation marks around it and the citation afterwards as to the website where the quote is found).

I am not making the claim in this thread that animal testing provides useful information.

I was obviously, deliberately, solely, and specifically refuting your own statement that if a drug had been tested on animals then it DID NOT WORK.

Which even you now admit is a false statement. Because in your two posts up you stated that penicillin was proven to be effective through human testing. Proven to be EFFECTIVE.

So apparently you don't believe your own statement.

"Only the non animal tested treatments have ever worked as the animals were never used to try to find cures for humans." Your statement, Shroedinger.

This is your argument as stated in that one sentence:

Shroedinger says that all drugs which were tested on animals do not work.
Penicillin is a drug which was tested on animals.
Therefore penicillin does not work.

Obviously doesn't stand the test of logic, does it?

Perhaps you simply misspoke when you made the statement, Shroedinger.

If you meant to say that animal testing doesn't in and of itself prove that a drug works - then I, of course, agree with that. But that isn't what you said.

If you'd like to amend your statement then that's perfectly OK. If you stand by it, however, then you have been proven wrong.
 

Past Member (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 3:22 pm
Read the link again you dope!
 

Goddess Lozz (213)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 3:37 pm
Penicillin may work but look at all the risks that come with it, it has even killed people, it is better to recover from an illness narurally than to take risks with pharma!
 

. (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 3:47 pm

I have read the link, Shroedinger. To an article which says that bacteria don't actually cause disease.

Which is obviously untrue.

Especially since even you admit that penicillin does work - your statement that "....penecillin was not proven to be effective through animal testing BUT ON HUMANS ALONE."

That penicillin was proven to be effective through human testing. Which is absolutely correct.

Nice to see that both you and Lorraine agree with me. That just because something was tested on animals doesn't mean that it is always and automatically an ineffective medication. Which is the only issue I was arguing. And which refutes your own statement absolutely.

Glad to see that no further discussion of the issue is necessary since it has already been conceded.

Have a nice evening.
 

Goddess Lozz (213)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 3:57 pm
This is very informative.

http://www.whale.to/v/disease3.html
 

Past Member (0)
Saturday October 4, 2008, 4:36 pm
From my link;

It is crucial to the joint publishers; http://www.health.org.nz/agcarm.html of Animal Research Saves Lives (all convinced vivisectionists) that the politicians, staff and pupils of educational institutions and the general public, to whom the booklet is distributed, believe and accept its content without question. However those who are sufficiently inspired or motivated to make their personal investigation will be amply rewarded as a cursory study of the overwhelming and easily-available evidence reveals the truth.
Clinical Medical Discoveries by Dr M. Beddow Bayly, M.R.C.S., L.R.C.P. outlines a brief history of the discovery and application, by human observations, of antibiotic penicillin until the advent of Prof. A. Fleming and Sir Howard Florey, who carried out all their initial experiments in vitro. More recently Dr Robert Sharpe, basing his article on Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics by T. Koppanyi and M.A. Avery, Vol. 7, 1966, pages 250-270, agreed with a report made by Hans Ruesch; http://www.health.org.nz/introartl.html#ruesch in Naked Empress (or the Great Medical Fraud) that Fleming, being worried that penicillin might be de-activated by blood, injected a sample into rabbits, which died. Discouraged he abandoned penicillin until Oxford scientists Florey and Chain resurrected it for further tests. Being out of stock of the usual guinea-pigs on the day of the trials they used mice which it cured and penicillin was acclaimed. Later trials with guinea-pigs proved fatal, even with tiny amounts.

Another coincidence occurred when Fleming was reluctant to inject penicillin into the spine of a critically-ill patient and Florey tried it on cats. As the patient was near death with insufficient time to observe the cats Fleming took a gamble and administered the penicillin. The patient lived and the cats died. Thus humans received penicillin despite the erroneous and inconclusive trials with animals which almost resulted in its rejection and abandonment.

So once again Lindsey tried her best to get at members of care2 and failed miserably.

Better luck next time Lindsey.

Oh thanks for providing the link Lozz at least you tried to show her but she wont listen oh well we tried.
 

Glenda J. (158)
Sunday October 5, 2008, 1:58 pm
You got it going on Scott..keep up the good work..your journey is welcomed in many homes across the nation..Sister Glenda
 

Past Member (0)
Monday October 6, 2008, 10:58 am

Thanks Scott for this news and Thank you Shroedrigner for posting many other valuable links and info, especially this very interesting info’ on penicillin, I knew that it was used first in humans, and that it failed in certain animals tests, but I wasn’t sure of the details. Shroedrigner, could you tell me if it’s true, that if Penicillin was discovered today it would actually fail the required animals ‘safety’ test?
 

Goddess Lozz (213)
Monday October 6, 2008, 1:27 pm
Kathy, animal tests have never been required, they just do them to make profit, the results have proven to not be helpful to humans and to be dangerous to our health. There are no 'safe' medicines in the pharma industry.
 

Past Member (0)
Monday October 6, 2008, 5:53 pm
Response to Kathy,

If you notice how it was tested back then the results were random, the approval of it was by injection into the patient by chance taking, whereas all the past tests done on animals was randon some animals died some lived. If the cat was tested and the results were seen first then it would never have been approved for human use because the same results would always have been noticed.

So if it was still being tested it would never have been discovered for human use thanks the random results from the animal tests.

Yet again another reason why animal testing is a fraudulent science. But its not science, not wen it is based on assumptions and ludicrous research which has nothing to do with the human system.
 

Past Member (0)
Tuesday October 7, 2008, 11:11 am
Thanks Shroedinger & Lorrain, I couln't agree more.

Oh and btw Lorrain you are so right about penicillin being VERY dangerous. I had a broken leg in 1979 and I would have died in hospital of penicillin poisoning if my mother had not been so informed and vigilant, she spotted a rash on my neck after I’d been delirious for over three weeks and she insisted that the doctors ‘immediately’ stopped injecting me with it (the doctors tried to deny the rash was caused by anything they were giving me!) I spent another 10 weeks in hospital having skin grafts to try and save my leg. So, if a Humans reaction to a drug can differ so drastically it is obvious that using animals is going to be totally unreliable.
 

Marion Y. (322)
Tuesday October 7, 2008, 11:15 am
Good article, Scott.
 

. (0)
Tuesday October 7, 2008, 11:25 am

I still can't seem to find those pesky scientific studies which back up the claim that hemp oil cures "all diseases".......
 

Goddess Lozz (213)
Tuesday October 7, 2008, 12:47 pm
Thanks Kathy...proof that pharmaceutical drugs are dangerous, I'm sorry you had to go through that painful time, actually it should be the medical industry who should be sorry!

Interesting reading:

http://www.vernoncoleman.com/trcc.htm

and especially for Lindsey:

http://www.xs4all.nl/~4david/1.html
http://www.thenhf.com/articles/articles_659/articles_659.htm
 

Past Member (0)
Thursday April 22, 2010, 8:13 pm
In 1937 DuPont patented nylon rope made from synthetic petrochemicals. Along with Duponts backer Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon the big money people prevailed and near the end of 1937 Congress passed the Marijuana Tax Act. By placing a prohibitively high tax on hemp production it destroyed the industry. This was done to protect these big money interests of the timber, petrochemical, and cotton industries. Hemp was briefly re-legalized during W.W.II. The U.S. government produced the movie Hemp for Victory to encourage farmers to grow hemp. Even 4H clubs were asked to grow hemp to help their country in wartime. The parachute that saved George Bush's life in World War II was made of hemp fiber.
 

Marion Y. (322)
Friday April 23, 2010, 10:05 am
Good post, Daniel! How can this nation ever soar for humanity, when it's stuck on the ground with these turkeys who stifle progress and innovation? The oil, chemical and other industries have dominated our economy for many years, when hemp and its by-products could have provided an affordable, healthy and environmentally-friendly alternative.
 

Hemp Oil (0)
Monday March 11, 2013, 1:26 pm
Hello everyone and how we doing, i would like to inform most serious cancer patients that i have a source to cure different kind of cancer with medical grade hemp oil because the hemp oil only will not cure cancer without RSO treatment control and no fees are requested before meeting my source. for further details. come to England:..cancermedicationtreatment@gmail.com
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.