Start A Petition

Supreme Court Considers Legality Of Abortion Clinic Buffer Zones

US Politics & Gov't  (tags: politics, SupremeCourt, usa, abortion politics, buffer zones around clinics, ethics )

- 1557 days ago -
The U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments Wednesday in a case testing the constitutionality of buffer zones at abortion clinics.

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Past Member (0)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 6:40 am

Winn A (179)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 7:06 am
Protesting at these clinics is wrong. They should be allowed to protest but not at the clinics.

pam w (139)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 9:44 am
What's next? Crowds outside gynecologists' offices, trying to intimidate women into staying away?

These ''protesters'' are nothing more than BULLIES!

Suppose I get a group of friends to stand outside a church on Sunday morning, demanding that they turn away from the superstition of religion?

How do you suppose THAT would go over?

Patricia H. (440)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 11:01 am

lee e (114)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 11:50 am
Pam is on a roll! Couldn't say it better - I particularly fear those such as the "noted' "spirit led" fanatic at one of these clinics - the law ought to be more like that of the SCOTUS - no protests near any clinic and no access for several 100 feet from them - there have been incidents reported - enough so to warrant the safety of clinic workers and patients access to and from, without the confrontation of fanatic, and/or violent fringe elements to invade such personal space!

Arielle S (313)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 12:48 pm
Yay, Pam! You go, girl! How about the buffers around voting areas? Buffers around politicians? All or none in my book. I'd rather see the buffer zone about three miles in this case.

Birgit W (160)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 1:00 pm
Pam says it all. Thanks for sharing.

Roger G (154)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 1:33 pm
noted, thanks

Athena F (131)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 2:35 pm
Bullies shouldn't be tolerated. Ever.

Lois Jordan (63)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 4:07 pm
Noted. Thanks, Cal. I wish these protesters would find something else to do with their time that might help actual children who are alive and in need. The Court needs to just send them home & stop them from harassing people.
*Flagged the spam "Lauren Langton" above.

. (0)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 5:06 pm
Bullying should not be tolerated. Thanks for sharing, Cal.

. (0)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 7:10 pm
Why not just ban all protesting altogether? These people have as much right to protest the murder of innocents as any animal rights activist has to protest the wearing of fur or factory farming or as those who protest against war or nuclear power or GMO's, or whatever ones cause may be.

Bryna Pizzo (139)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 8:56 pm
Thank you for the news. We have to protect women's rights.

Lloyd H (46)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 9:06 pm
I am sure that Justice Antonin 'The Scab' Scalia will not consider in any way the violence caused by these grandmother types. Sine 1977: 8 murders, 17 attempted murders, 42 bombings, 176 arsons, 99 other failed bombings and arsons, 391 physical invasions of personal and business properties, 1478 acts of vandalism, 100 BUTYRIC ACID ATTACKS, 663 anthrax threats - 482 since 9/11/01, 191 assaults, 420 death threats, and 4 KIDNAPPINGS. The Grandma Face is a front for a bunch Christian Taliban of America jihad terrorists and it is far past time when they should be subject treatment as the TERRORISTS that they are.

Edith B (146)
Wednesday January 15, 2014, 9:58 pm
Thanks, Cal, for posting. Thanks, Lloyd H. for the stats. What gives these people the right to get in the face of a woman who may or may not be going in for an abortion? We have freedom of religion in this country, not freedom to force your religion on everyone else. These protestors are no better in my opinion than those from the Westgate church who protest at military funerals. Leave other people alone, Live your life as you choose, let them live as THEY choose.

Past Member (0)
Thursday January 16, 2014, 1:11 am
I am all for the democratic right to protest but along with democracy comes responsibility. Democracy is not a right it is a privilege and needs to be defended from those who abuse it.

Bridget Robertson (106)
Thursday January 16, 2014, 1:34 am
Noted. The only saving factor may be that SCOTUS doesn't really like to undo other SCOTUS rulings. They understand that the more they do overturn, they leave a legacy for a future Supreme Court to easily overturn them. It's a thin hope that I will cling to right now.

Rosa Caldwell (384)
Wednesday June 25, 2014, 2:06 am
Interesting, thanks for sharing.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in US Politics & Gov't

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.