START A PETITION27,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

Eco-Advocates Deeply Unhappy With Keystone XL Pipeline Review. Rep. Grijalva Calls It a 'Sham'

Environment  (tags: ecosystems, forests, environment, destruction, Keystone XL Pipeline REview, protection, conservation, habitatdestruction, habitat, pollution )

- 664 days ago -
The final decision on the pipeline must await an interagency review, evaluation of public comments and President Obama's consideration of whatever recommendation the State Department sends him

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Dave C. (237)
Friday January 31, 2014, 6:56 pm
sadly not surprised

Past Member (0)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 2:44 am

Bridget Robertson (106)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 4:00 am
It's more than a Sham. When the Southern leg oped on January 22, I knew which way this was going. I wish more environmental groups had put focus on what breaks and leaks could do to water, watershed and land. The pipeline itself does not create carbon problems. Extracting Tar sands, refining Tar Sands, shipping them to China and China burning them creates big carbon problems. Pipelines break. That creates huge water and land problems.

Sylvie A. (193)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 4:04 am
Quelle catastrophe que cette exploitation !!!

lee e. (114)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 5:45 am
Thanks Cal - This is a "call to Action" I certainly hope everyone who reads this recognizes that fact! Included in the site are means whereby we as citizens can submit our objections within 90 days, there are guidelines and helpful information to make your statement and there are certain deadlines referred! This is on us now -- Please Please do your part to stop this sham!
Who would have thought that an ARIZONA Congressman would be so conscientious?! Love him

Philip Heinlein (473)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 6:34 am
Hello, State Department. I see the lights are on but it doesn't look like anyone is home. John Kerry, where are you?

Did anyone not see the news report this past week about all the leaks in the current pipelines that is moving this stuff? And how it mentioned that the supposedly superb leak detection system only identified 19% of them?

Poses no threat to the environment? Hello?

Michael Kirkby (91)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 6:45 am
Noted & posted

. (0)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 9:36 am
When the pipeline was first discussed, why wasn't the State Dept. in on the environmental impact this could cause? The EPA? Canadian environmental agencies? What is this nonsense about Obama getting :recommendations from the State Dept."? He should have had them nearly 2 years ago.
A "supplemental impact statement"? What the heck is this? P.S. information on what this pipeline can potentially do to the US and or Canada?
The administration is pathetic in its lies and at best half truths.

Frances Darcy (231)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 9:44 am

S S. (0)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 11:54 am
Thank you.

Julia Staten (0)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 12:17 pm
m­­­y ­­­neighbor­­­'s mot­­­her-i­­­n-law mak­­­es $­­­80 an ­­­hour on the lap­­­top . She has been out of a job­­­ fo­­­r eig­­­ht m­­­onths b­­­ut last ­­­month­­­ h­­­er paym­­­ent w­­­as­­­ $1753­­­9­­­ ju­­­st wor­­­king on­­­ ­­­the ­­­lap­­­top f­­­o­­­r a few­­­ hour­­­s. ch­­­eck ­­­this­­­ sit­­­e o­­­ut ­­­

pam w. (138)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 3:05 pm
Flagged the spam

Article is infuriating!

Nimue Pendragon (323)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 3:31 pm

Lois Jordan (61)
Saturday February 1, 2014, 5:27 pm
Noted. Hats off to Rep. Grijalva....he's in the district next-door to mine. When that southern "leg" became functional several days ago, I saw the writing on the wall. I really hate how these things are hidden from the public. Promises are broken, lies are thrown around....people are paid off. We need a massive "green energy" movement that makes Occupy look like a small gathering. A Green revolution.

Past Member (0)
Sunday February 2, 2014, 1:03 am
This is not surprising public officials are very adept at sidelining public opinion to get their own way a future accident accident awaits down the line.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.

site feedback


Problem on this page? Briefly let us know what isn't working for you and we'll try to make it right!