Start A Petition

TAKE ACTION: Speak Up for Conflict Minerals Regulations

World  (tags: TAKE ACTION: SIGN PETITION, conflict, corruption, Congo, conflict minerals, crime, ethics, government, humanrights )

- 2495 days ago -
This is a critical moment for conflict minerals regulations. Join us in the fight to ensure our electronics products are not fueling rape and violence in eastern Congo by sending an email to your Member of Congress. Ask them to weigh in with the SEC ..

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


RosemaryRannes H (650)
Thursday August 18, 2011, 11:03 pm
Petition limited to U.S. ... should be world wide.

Another news item arrived along with this action from

Setting the Record Straight on Congo's Conflict Minerals
Posted by Enough Team on Aug 16, 2011

Last Monday, The New York Times op-ed by David Aronson sparked some heated debate, and stirred up serious concerns regarding the push toward certification in the Congo. The title of his op-ed “How Congress Devastated Congo” demonstrates the direct link that Aronson claims exists between the U.S. Dodd-Frank legislation and the economic problems in the Congo. He wrote:

It’s a long way from the marble halls of Congress to the ailing mining towns of eastern Congo, but the residents of Nyabibwe and Nzibira know exactly what’s to blame for their economic woes.

In response to this moot point—and several others put forth by Aronson—The New York Times published four rebuttal Letters to the Editor this morning titled, “A Conflict Over ‘Conflict Minerals’.” Authors of the letters included: United Nations Special Representative of the Secretary General for Sexual Violence in Conflict Margot Walström, Columbia Law Professor Peter Rosenblum, Director of Global Witness Campaigns Gavin Hayman, and Enough Project Congo Field Researcher Fidel Bafilemba.

In Walström’s letter, she critically responded to Aronson’s op-ed and its suggestion that Congress is to blame for the situation in the Congo:

In fact the United States government should be commended for its leadership in trying to regulate conflict minerals’ and to starve rebels of the resources and weapons they need to kill and rape. Although implementation needs better support to prevent human suffering, particularly in a vast, largely lawless country like Congo, the intention of the Dodd-Frank law is admirable. Inaction is not an option.

Enough's letter refuted Aronson’s claims by citing personal experience. “I have seen how the law has helped lead the Congolese Army to pull out of several mines, and how lowered exports are threatening commanders’ profits,” Bafilemba wrote. “The law accelerates reform.”

These four letters are part of a growing number of voices questioning the claims made by Aronson last week. In a rebuttal article last Tuesday in The Huffington Post, "What Conflict Minerals Legislation is Actually Accomplishing in Congo," Sasha Lezhnev said that Aronson’s op-ed “misses the critical link in eastern Congo: the continuing role of the minerals trade as a fuel for violence and a major source of revenue for armed groups and military units responsible for atrocities.”

Lezhnev claimed that contrary to Aronson’s assertion that all Congolese civil society is against the bill, “many Congolese civil society groups are vocal advocates for the legislation and have written to the SEC asking for strong and timely regulations.”

Congo expert Jason Stearns echoed this point in a post last week, “Thoughts about Conflict Minerals,” on his Congo Siasa blog. He said that Aronson’s op-ed gives a false impression that all Congolese are opposed to the Dodd-Frank bill, which is misleading. “As recently as May 2011, a group of over 50 Congolese NGOs, together with over a dozen US and European NGOs, expressed their support for Dodd-Frank and urged for its rapid and thorough implementation,” he wrote.

Furthermore, Stearns argued that Aronson’s claim that Dodd-Frank is out-of-date because most Congolese rebel groups have been integrated into the Congolese army “does not accurately reflect the reality on the ground.”

“In general, David seems to imply that doing nothing would have been better than pushing for greater transparency,” Stearns said. “However, as various United Nations and NGO reports (including reports by Eric Kajemba and other Congolese activists) have explained in depth, the link between armed groups and mining remains strong – and delinking that nexus remains key to broader reform efforts in the region.”

Echoing these rebuttals, Salil Tripathi, director of policy at the Institute for Human Rights and Business, wrote a response to Aronson’s piece for The Guardian’s Poverty Matters Blog entitled, “Ignore the Naysayers, Restrictions on DRC Conflict Minerals Remain Vital.”

Tripathi stated that Aronson’s argument—requiring companies to identify the source of their minerals will drive investment away from the DRC and keep people poor—is “a familiar argument, often made with regard to economic sanctions. It is also simplistic and wrong.”

He recognized that even though Global Witness and the Enough Project have spearheaded international campaigns against conflict minerals from the DRC, they are not naïve. “They are aware of the impact of such measures on artisanal miners, but also see a greater evil: prolonged conflict,” Tripathi explained.

Further responses rebutting Aronson’s article include:

•Cydney Posner’s article, “Rebuttal to NYT op-ed regarding the Dodd-Frank Conflict Minerals Provision” posted on Cooley LLP- News Briefs. 8/10/2011.
•Global Witness’s response, “The Dodd-Frank Act’s Section 1502 on Conflict Minerals.” Global Witness. 8/10/2011.
•Charles Keenan’s article, “Digging Into the Dodd-Frank: Why Conflict Minerals Matter” in Board Member Magazine. 8/11/2011.
Photo: Tantalum miners in eastern Congo (Enough Project/ Sasha Lezhnev)


Judy C (97)
Thursday August 18, 2011, 11:14 pm
Signed. Thanks Rosemary.

Lisa Neste (207)
Friday August 19, 2011, 4:16 pm
Signed, thanks Rosemary!

Carol H (229)
Friday August 19, 2011, 4:22 pm
action taken, thanks Rosemary

Ellen m (215)
Friday August 19, 2011, 4:39 pm
Already signed.
If you have to get a diamond, go with man-made!

Mary T (178)
Friday August 19, 2011, 4:56 pm
Signed and thanks Rosemary.

Kathy Chadwell (354)
Friday August 19, 2011, 5:33 pm
Noted & signed with thanks Rosemary
LOLOL we all know I sign petitions, but it gives me more joy these days because I'm apparently getting on Rep. Todd Rokita's last nerve:)

Sheryl G (360)
Friday August 19, 2011, 6:49 pm
Action taken. I agree it should be a world wide petition.

Sime Validzic (244)
Friday August 19, 2011, 8:56 pm
Cannot "sign" since this is for U.S. citizens only but can I remember "signing" another petition on this issue within the last few months.

patricia lasek (317)
Saturday August 20, 2011, 7:23 am

Regina P (67)
Saturday August 20, 2011, 10:53 am
Noted & signed. Thanks

Anna M (112)
Saturday August 20, 2011, 11:21 am
Signed and will share in the Slavery Today group. Thanks so much, Rosemary. Hopefully more worldwide petitions will come out soon. This is so urgent.

Marianna molnar woods (9)
Saturday August 20, 2011, 1:33 pm

Jane H (139)
Saturday August 20, 2011, 2:49 pm
noted and signed

AWAY AWHILE Cal Mendelsohn (1067)
Saturday August 20, 2011, 2:52 pm
thanks--signed and noted!!

John Williams (36)
Saturday August 20, 2011, 3:25 pm
Aronson's Op-ED sounds like a paid lobbyist for the metal industry wrote it. Can we check his bank statement ???

Saturday August 20, 2011, 5:12 pm
Signed and noted, thanks!

Dogan Ozkan (5)
Saturday August 20, 2011, 10:13 pm
noted and signed

Ralph F (67)
Saturday August 20, 2011, 10:18 pm
Noted & signed.

Naoko i (264)
Sunday August 21, 2011, 5:14 am
I shouldn't be able to sign, but I did (signed). If the petition only requires zip code but not the actual street names, I can sign.

Robert G (3)
Sunday August 21, 2011, 6:24 am
Noted and signed.

Past Member (0)
Sunday August 21, 2011, 7:51 am
Signed, thanks. I take exception to having to fill out additional info for one of my senators and select a subject. There really aren't enough choices...and you can't fill in one yourself.

Past Member (0)
Monday August 22, 2011, 1:28 pm
As a non US citizen I can't sign this. But I wish I could. It's an important matter.

Vallee R (280)
Tuesday August 23, 2011, 9:26 am
Noted, signed and posted.

alicia m (97)
Thursday August 25, 2011, 2:32 pm
noted, can't signed, gracias

SANDRA R (144)
Thursday August 25, 2011, 3:45 pm
Noted and forwarded. Thank you Rosemary.

Susanne R (235)
Thursday September 1, 2011, 10:08 pm
Signed and noted. Thanks, Rosemary!

caterina caligiuri (69)
Friday September 2, 2011, 1:14 pm
...only US sorry

. (1)
Friday September 9, 2011, 8:47 am
Noted and signed. Thank you Rosemary.

Jenny Dooley (830)
Monday September 12, 2011, 6:21 pm
only US can sign, sorry. noted, shared.

Jenny Dooley (830)
Monday September 12, 2011, 6:23 pm
Thanks An for sharing this in SLAVERY TODAY group. Thanks Rosemary for the news.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in World

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.