START A PETITION37,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

Prisoners of Greed - Puppy Mills Breed Misery in India


Animals  (tags: animaladvocates, animalwelfare, animalrights )


- 3279 days ago - thepetitionsite.com
There are no rules for dog breeders / pet shops & fish aquarium here in India, hence AWBI should make the rules, please sign this petition for animal rights & their welfare..... punishments for violation of the PCA Act, 1960 also needs amendments.........



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

SK MITTAL (7)
Sunday August 3, 2008, 3:26 am
You are correct.
 

Joycey B (750)
Sunday August 3, 2008, 7:10 am
Gladly signed against this horrible business. Noted with thanks Naresh.
 

Rose L (202)
Sunday August 3, 2008, 10:10 am
Noted and Petition signed Thankyou Naresh
 

. (0)
Sunday August 3, 2008, 10:44 am
Noted and signed
 

Angela Rhodes (127)
Sunday August 3, 2008, 11:10 am
Noted and signed, thank you.
 

Carol Waterman (158)
Sunday August 3, 2008, 8:54 pm
ANIMAL ACTIVISTS ARE CONTINUOUSLY FIGHTING FOR THE CLOSURE OF ALL PUPPY MILLS WORLD WIDE. WE WON'T STOP FIGHTING THESE HORRIBLE BREEDERS UNTIL WE WIN AND BELIEVE ME, WE WILL WIN. THESE HORRIBLE BREEDERS SHOULD BE SEVERELY PUNISHED & HELD IN PRISON, JUST AS THEY HAVE HELD THESE POOR HELPLESS CREATURES. WE ARE WATCHING YOU, INDIA!
A Dedicated Volunteer in Animal Welfare
Montreal, Quebec. CANADA
 

Darlene K (356)
Sunday August 3, 2008, 9:46 pm
Noted and petition signed, thank you.
 

. (0)
Sunday August 3, 2008, 11:25 pm
Just horrible, signed, thanks Naresh
 

Linda M (40)
Sunday August 3, 2008, 11:57 pm
When so many dogs are cruelly slaughtered on the streets of India this is a double shame -signed
 

serge vrabec (278)
Monday August 4, 2008, 2:56 am
WORL-WIDE WARNING: To All those who abuse animals, your behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated anymore by the majority, you have been forewarned, please stop, last chance to get right.
 

Anne T (286)
Monday August 4, 2008, 8:26 am
Definitly signed.
Thankyou Naresh.
 

Jim P (3261)
Monday August 4, 2008, 9:40 am
Petition signed.

TY, Naresh.

 

Shirley H (49)
Monday August 4, 2008, 3:14 pm
Signed and noted.
Shirley H.
 

Kathy W (299)
Monday August 4, 2008, 10:45 pm
Thank you! You signed at 12:40 AM PDT, Aug 4, 2008
 

Monica Brunner (8)
Tuesday August 5, 2008, 7:48 am
Signed and passed on. This is just disgraceful. This needs to stop in both India and China, they are now the worlds biggest producers and users/abusers of not only animals but our natural resources as well. We must stop this nonsense.
 

Past Member (0)
Sunday August 31, 2008, 3:26 am
Dear friends,
International Organization for Animal Protection – OIPA –www.oipa.org an Italy based working since 1981 & duly affiliated with the United Nations, Department of public information, undersigned is the representative of OIPA in India & founder chairman, PFA HARYANA –www.pfaharyana.in as well.
Today I along with OIPA INDIA north zone coordinator Mandheer Maan appeal you all friends to be more compassionate towards animals about their rights & welfare, pet as hobby –no problem but pet for profit gives commercial – business points of view & with this thought you have to follow the law of the land & we are ready to provide legal awareness amongst the public with motto –WHY UN-NECESSARY PAIN & SUFFERINGS to the animals? So please follow the rules & law of the land, do your fundamental duties as defined in the article 51 – A(g) of the constitution of India.

TRADE IN EXOTIC SPECIES BY BREEDERS:
Breeders are creating a consumer market for endangered species by selling exotic species and this is against the spirit of international cooperation endorsed by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) of which India is a member country. CITES is an international agreement between governments on trade in specimens of wild animals and plants. To implement it requires coordination between countries. India cannot demand cooperation from other countries to control trafficking in rhino horns and ivory products if some persons irresponsibly create a consumer market for the Brazilian macaw and North American snake varieties.
The situation is worsened by a complete absence of laws to protect and monitor imported exotic wildlife species imported by breeders. If released into local ecosystems by accident or design, such a biological invasion of non-native species (by predation, competition and spread of disease) can have a far reaching impact on agriculture, forestry, fisheries and development.
But trafficking in rare and exotic wildlife is big business in India! And it is being conducted in utter anarchy in a legal vacuum. Every year, hundreds of animals enter the exotic pet trade but no governmental authority will own the responsibility of tracking imported exotic animals and ascertaining whether they have been released into the local habitat.
WE BELIEVE THAT:
• the only way to stop the proliferation of the exotic animal trade and the suffering in it causes is to stop the breeding, bartering, trading, and sale of exotic animals for personal profit and amusement, and to teach the public that wild animals belong in the wild, not in our homes

TRADE IN COMPANION ANIMALS BY BREEDERS:
There has been a proliferation of ‘backyard breeders’ in the NCT of Delhi of late. These persons do not care or know about genetics and bloodlines, do not properly screen potential buyers, raise the animals in poor conditions and practice irresponsible inbreeding as a result of which more and more cases of dogs with hip dysphasia, epilepsy, respiratory ailments, kidney failure, umbilical hernias, heart murmurs, eye defects, hemophilia, problematic pregnancies, etc. are brought to veterinary clinics. These are a direct consequence of breeding brother to sister or parent to child.
We are appalled by the lack of responsibility taken by government officials in keeping a check on the inhumane conditions of commercial breeding kennels in Delhi. Such establishments are a disgrace to our community. While there are laws worldwide to check and control commercial breeding, there are no laws in current usage to keep a check on whether adequate care is being provided to animals bred for commerce by breeders and whether they are living in substandard living conditions in effort to increase profit.
WE THEREFORE DEMAND:
1. That breeders provide (a) breeding charts, (b) documentary proof on whether they have bred dogs that at least two years old, (c) proof whether a resting period has been maintained for bitches between litters, (d) whether they have been tested for any genetic health problems before the breeding, and (e) information on what happens to animals when they cannot breed anymore.
2. That checks be implemented by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi/Animal Welfare Division (Ministry of Environment and Forests) to ensure that breeders (a) compulsorily provide information on the health testing of most of the immediate relatives of the animals bred, (b) offer a guarantee against genetic health problems, (c) rationalize the prices of dogs and (d) provide authentic papers with animals sold by them.
3. That the Animal Welfare Division and the Wildlife authorities (a) take strict action against those breeders who import and breed exotic species of monkeys like marmosets, snakes, tortoises and fishes as pets, (b) immediately rectify the lacunae in the Wildlife Protection Act that allows such wildlife species exemption from seizure, (c) track such animals imported and provide proof to the public that such species have not been dispersed into the environment by the breeders by accident or design thus causing an unquantifiable disturbance to the ecology.
WE, THE UNDERSIGNED NGOs:
• Oppose the mass breeding of animals for profit because of the suffering, exploitation and trauma of the animals involved. It is foolish that on the one hand the Municipal Corporation of Delhi sterilizes dogs and on the other hand allows the unchecked breeding to carry on without controls.
• Believe that as a society we have domesticated the dog and the cat and in doing so now have a responsibility to treat them as domestic animals and not livestock.
• Support the elimination of breeding establishments through enactment of new legislation, and public education to eliminate the market for such animals.
• Oppose the deliberate capture and confinement, import and the breeding of wild or exotic animals as pets.

WE STRONGLY ENCOURAGE THE ADOPTION OF PETS FROM ANIMAL SHELTERS. COMPASSION IS NOT A TRADE. DOMESTICATED ANIMALS ARE COMPANIONS NOT A COMMODITY TO BE SOLD FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROFIT BY BREEDERS.
EXOTIC ANIMALS ARE BEST LEFT IN THEIR NATURAL ENVIRONMENT.
COMMERCIAL BREEDERS AND TRAFFICKERS OF EXOTIC ANIMALS MUST BE URGENTLY BROUGHT TO BOOK BY THE CONCERNED AUTHORITIES AND DRASTIC CHECKS AND CONTROLS MUST BE PLACED ON THEM. BETTER STILL, SUCH FACILITIES SHOULD BE ELIMINATED ALL TOGETHER.


Naresh Kadyan & Mandheer Maan
Along with Friendicose-SECA, Wildlife SOS, Citizens for the Welfare and Protection of Animals (regd.)

 

Past Member (0)
Sunday August 31, 2008, 8:25 am
http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Illegal-petshop-Maneka-Gandhi-fumes-Delhi-Police-turns-a-blind-eye/321149/
New Delhi, June 10 Former environment minister Maneka Gandhi has accused the Delhi Police of sheltering a petshop owner, whose establishment was detected doing brisk business in endangered birds and reptiles in a raid last month.

While Gandhi says the police is dragging its feet on the case, officers of the force said they have “instructions” not to take action against the owner, curiously terming it as a “VIP case”.

Gandhi’s NGO People for Animals (PFA) had been alerted last month that ‘The Petshop’ — located in the basement of Greenview Apartments in New Mangalpuri — sold endangered Macaws, turtles and lizards. The PFA spoke to the police and accompanied a team on May 20 for the raid.

Gandhi said several species covered under the 1972 Wildlife Protection Act and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES) were found in the shop and were photographed. Subsequently, a joint report (in possession of Newsline) prepared by Wildlife Inspector R R Meena and Mehrauli police station Sub Inspector A K Singh detailed that five American red-eared sliders (turtles), corn snakes and candy canes (snakes) had been found on the shop’s shelves. The report mentions the owner as one Jayesh Mathur of Dwarka.

Three weeks later, when Newsline visited the raided establishment, it appeared to be business as usual. Present at that time in the shop was one Dhirendra Swarup, who flaunted a pair of blue and golden Macaws to this correspondent. “This pair is worth Rs 1.8 lakh,” Swarup said. However, other protected species such as the snakes and turtles — photographed during the raid — were missing from the shelves. Trade in foreign birds is restricted by the CITES.

But nothing happened after the raid. Maneka Gandhi said, “A few days ago, we got a call from a district forest officer who asked us to back off, saying this was a VIP case and that no action would be taken against the owner.”

On the other hand, senior officers who would not be named, said they were troubled over this “VIP petshop” but would say no more. Delhi Police’s spokesperson Rajan Bhagat said, “No animal was confiscated during the raid. We spoke to the wildlife inspector who said the animals found were not covered under the Wildlife Protection Act.”

Maneka Gandhi said the matter was then taken to the Wildlife Crime Branch in the Ministry of Environment and Forests. Gandhi said, “Its head M B Lall has said the Ministry is examining the case.” But when Newsline contacted Lall, he said, “I have no idea about this. This case comes under the jurisdiction of the Delhi Wildlife Department.”

Gandhi said when the PFA confronted the government to check if the owner had the necessary papers to do business in these animals, they were shown a “few baseless permits”. These papers include a letter from a firm in Singapore permitting the export of 12 turtles as personal pets flown in on March 9, 2005.

In the same bunch was another interesting letter (dated April 11, 2005) from the Animal Quarantine Service, Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying in Kapashera. This letter said the department had no objection to the import of “65 reptiles” from Singapore.

Gandhi said, “The permission to import from Singapore was for 12 turtles, but the Quarantine service in India okayed 65. On top of this, a permission from Singapore doesn’t entitle anyone to bring in animals without India’s permission.”
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)


Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Animals





 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.