Start A Petition

Separation of Church and the US Military? Not Really! Forced Relgion, Really!

Society & Culture  (tags: abuse, activists, americans, culture, dishonesty, education, environment, ethics, freedoms, government, law, politics, religion, rights, society )

- 2126 days ago -
Frederick Douglass: "Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will."

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Kit B (276)
Wednesday August 22, 2012, 11:19 am

Without Concrete Action, New USAF Regulations on Church-State Separation Will Be as Useful as a Football Bat....

At the very beginning of August 2012, I blasted outgoing (now-retired) Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force (CSAF), Gen. Norton Schwartz, for his lackadaisical and utterly impotent attitude toward the unconstitutional epidemic of coercive proselytization and innumerable religious violations within the United States Air Force (USAF). Referring to Schwartz as the "Joe Paterno" of the USAF for his truly despicable role in covering up of this cascading torrent of spiritual molestation, predation, and abuse, I cited the years-long, disingenuously cordial and utterly inconsequential string of meetings and telephonic communications between him and me. With great regret and no small amount of frustration, I noted that the General's "term of service as USAF Chief of Staff has epitomized a tortured, gutless legacy that's now being left behind for the rest of us to wretchedly wallow in." This dystopian description was in reference to the dire national security repercussions of the ongoing Christian fundamentalist takeover of what constitutes the most formidable and lethal aerial war fighting force devised in human history.

Our criticism of Schwartz's track record as Chief of Staff hasn't fallen on entirely deaf ears. As regular readers of this column well know, one of my favorite maxims is a quote from Frederick Douglass: "Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will." Once again this approach has been universally validated. How? In the form of a new official USAF document. This mandatory USAF directive was issued mere days after my Op-Ed condemnation of Schwartz's term as CSAF was published. Entitled " Air Force Instruction 1-1, Air Force Standards ," this document establishes a uniform standard of conduct within the USAF and serves to underscore the fatally obscure and confusing series of instructional guidelines that had previously been haphazardly spewed across the entirety of the USAF chain of command. The guidelines laid out within Air Force Instruction 1-1 (AFI 1-1) govern various aspects of the conduct expected of all USAF airmen and cadets in the field of culture, conduct, values, discipline, and performance. According to an Air Force press release, "Having a one-stop shop for standards-related guidelines, while not unprecedented, has long been absent in the Air Force."

The cover sheet of this 27 page document bears former CSAF Schwartz's certification, and reads in big, black, and bold type: "COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY." Far more importantly, the cover further explains, "failure to adhere to the standards set out in this instruction can form the basis for adverse action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). An example would be a dereliction of duty offense under [UCMJ] Article 92." This invokes the draconian possibility of trial by courts-martial faced by armed forces members who willingly or unwillingly fail to obey orders or regulations.

Of particular significance for those of us who value the Constitutional guarantees that prevent us from falling into the grip of fundamentalist Christian tyranny is Section 2.11 of AFI 1-1:

"2.11. Government Neutrality Regarding Religion. Leaders at all levels must balance constitutional protections for an individual's free exercise of religion or other personal beliefs and the constitutional prohibition against governmental establishment of religion. For example, they must avoid the actual or apparent use of their position to promote their personal religious beliefs to their subordinates or to extend preferential treatment for any religion. Commanders or supervisors who engage in such behavior may cause members to doubt their impartiality and objectivity. The potential result is a degradation of the unit's morale, good order, and discipline. Airmen, especially commanders and supervisors, must ensure that in exercising their right of religious free expression, they do not degrade morale, good order, and discipline in the Air Force or degrade the trust and confidence that the public has in the United States Air Force."

Wow! Hold the presses. Imagine that for just one second. Try to mentally picture any member of the USAF actually being subjected to criminal sanction for violating Section 2.11's mandates against religious supremacy, exceptionalism and prejudice. Would that ever seriously happen? Could that ever seriously happen?

Ensuring that it does is the raison d'etre of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF). Indeed, the very reason for the existence of MRFF, the organization that I head, is the toxic environment of religious bigotry, intolerance, and oppression that lies systemically and ubiquitously across the entirety of the United States armed services as a living, breathing, metastasizing national security threat. This enormous danger has compelled us to tirelessly persevere in our campaign for Constitutional compliance. Schwartz's issuance of a memo on "Government Neutrality Regarding Religion" back in September 2011 was one result of our fervent Constitutionalism. The memo's release was terribly discrete and its application appallingly discretionary. At some USAF installations, the men and women under Schwartz's command treacherously saw fit to keep the memo under de facto quarantine, accessible only to officers of the most senior rank. For weeks this travesty played itself out at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA), my alma mater and a hotbed of unconstitutional Christian extremism and Dominionist fundamentalism. Did Schwartz lift a finger against these open acts of obstructionist insubordination? Of course not. Following a literal torrent of complaints from numerous officers, NCOs, staff, and cadets at USAFA, our civil rights foundation was finally forced to erect a highly visible public billboard down the street from the Academy containing the text of the entire memo. This billboard's display led to frenetic damage control efforts by USAFA that were ultimately crowned by the open distribution of the memo throughout the Academy's Cadet Wing (student body). MRFF's billboard (and overall efforts) forced that victorious outcome.

In both civilian and military life, respect for human and civil rights exists only in direct proportion to the battles waged to ensure this respect. Schwartz's literal 11th hour release of Section 2.11 (within Air Force Instruction 1-1) bears much of the essence of his previously released Religious Neutrality memo. Furthermore, it was merely a belated response to MRFF's continual exposure of his scandalously non-confrontational approach to the Christian extremist predators within the USAF who flout their oath to support and defend the U.S. Constitution. It was a transparent and likely guilt-ridden concession by Schwartz, yet it was both too little and too late. With Schwartz's butt-covering, last second, "midnight drive-by" delivery of AFI 1-1, we have no alternative left but to look to the new USAF Chief of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Welsh III, to show the all-too-rare backbone once required of all top leaders within the U.S. Military. However, the fundamentalist Christian "American Taliban's" domineering influence hangs like the ominous Sword of Damocles over the Joint Chiefs' table. What's now required? Two things:
1) Our continued dogged persistence and clear demands for Constitutional compliance with guaranteed church-state separation civil rights, and

2) The USAF's demonstration of a manifest and objective willingness to enforce and punish the legions of fundamentalist religious predators inextricably intertwined within its own ranks. Sans this tandem of concrete corrective action, this brand new Section 2.11 of AFI 1-1 will be about as useful as a "football bat" in preventing an evangelical Fundamentalist coup d'etat within the U.S. Air Force.

By Mikey Weinstein, AlterNet | News Analysis | Truthout |


Past Member (0)
Wednesday August 22, 2012, 5:04 pm
Noted. Thanks.

Terrie W (798)
Wednesday August 22, 2012, 9:29 pm
Lovely....NOT! Modern day 'crusaders'. Just what we DON'T need! I am glad my father isn't around to see this happening. He'd have another massive heart attack knowing this this crap was going on, not just in the army, it is happening in all the armed forces.

Giana Peranio-paz (398)
Thursday August 23, 2012, 4:10 am

Joe R (190)
Thursday August 23, 2012, 8:27 am
Thanks Kit.

. (0)
Thursday August 23, 2012, 9:36 am
Interesting to read -thanks Kit

Sharon F (0)
Thursday August 23, 2012, 12:52 pm
Hey, we need separation of church and state. If church does not stay out of state business, church needs to start paying taxes.

Lois Jordan (63)
Thursday August 23, 2012, 3:48 pm
(Still trying to Note today). I agree that they should rescind the tax-exempt status of churches. The co-mingling is so obvious now, it's scandalous. So grateful the MRFF exists!

Craig Zimmerman (86)
Thursday August 23, 2012, 4:41 pm
There is nothing in the U.S. constitution about the separation of church and state.

Fred Krohn (34)
Thursday August 23, 2012, 5:15 pm
'Separation' of church and state is a fiction; nonfavouritism of peaceful faiths by the state is specified in the Constitution. Proselytisation in the service is a crime; support for multiple peaceful faiths is the norm. Kick the religious extremists out of positions of leadership in both the military and the government!

Gloria H (88)
Thursday August 23, 2012, 8:04 pm
Well, well, about the commandment of thou shall not kill??? If THAT was really practiced then there would be NO military- period. For the time being it is onward Christian soldiers onto war....holy carp! Is THAT something Jesus would agree to? You think he would gloat over the civilian collateral that happens in war? What would he say about the dead kids, old people, non combatants, getting killed ? Would he cry when he sat with the dying? He'd have his job made out for him healing the wounded, comforting the orphans and widows of wars carried out in his honor to convert!!

Marie W (67)
Thursday August 23, 2012, 9:11 pm
Crusades anyone..?

Marianna molnar woods (9)
Friday August 24, 2012, 12:49 am

Friday August 24, 2012, 1:26 am
Richard the Lionheart would have been be gleeful about this. Its time these busybodies kept their "Faith" to themselves. Load of Medieval Fairy Tales

Gene J (290)
Friday August 24, 2012, 4:51 pm
Giggle. Okay that is a LOT. But I can put it in simpler terms. With a caveat. While I was in basic training in early 1968, every Sunday morning there was a bus to church. Sunday's were supposed to be our day of "rest". But if you didn't get on that bus, things were found for you to do. So, as a quick learner, I decided it was best to get on that bus. We listened to a "chaplain" tell us of the glory of war, the fight of the righteous against the ungodly communists. I tuned out most of that. I knew why I was there. I was poor, had no money for college, and a draft was coming anyway. So enlistment provided me with a means to college and a way to choose my "job". I chose clerical. :^). Thought who shoots at clerks? Didn't know at 18 that every infantry company has a company clerk who not only carried a rifle, but a typewriter too. Still outfoxed them though, the clerical training was self-paced, a 3 week course, but I already knew how to type and I finished the course in just over a day. The first 10 of us got sent to Finance School, payroll and other things, which DID keep us out of infantry companies, so whomever was watching over me did her work well there and protected me from myself. Caveat: I never did, and still don't, understand how preachers, ministers, could justify what they did for a living. Convince young men, and then we were almost all men, that going to some foreign country and dying, or worse (and believe me there are lots worse things that can happen to soldiers than dying, in my opinion), was a good thing. No minister I'd ever heard preached a message like that. So, my caveat is, I wonder how those people live with themselves. How they reconcile the message of love they come out of the seminary with into bleed and die for your country. Not for honor, not for humanity, just because some lieutenant said go there and don't leave. Knowing that many of those young people would be killed or maimed. I don't believe in hell, but if I did? There'd be an especially hot spot reserved for those chaplains, and imams, who make young people believe such horrible lies.

Phil R (29)
Friday August 24, 2012, 5:07 pm
Really! What about those who serve who aren't Christians? There must be Jews, Buddhists, Muslims..and even (dare i say it?) Atheists in the USAF. Thanks Kit. :)

Barbara Tomlinson (431)
Saturday August 25, 2012, 6:11 pm
There most certainly ARE Atheists in the U.S. Military!
Many of them became that, AFTER their experiences in the Military....

And, contrary to that old cliche', THERE MOST CERTAINLY *ARE* "ATHEISTS IN FOXHOLES".

This from a good, comprehensive Atheist Blog...
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Society & Culture

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.