Start A Petition

This Presidential Race Should Never Have Been This Close -- Matt T

US Politics & Gov't  (tags: americans, candidates, congress, constitution, corruption, dishonesty, elections, economy, ethics, Govtfearmongering, healthcare, housing, JOBS, lies, media, military, obama, politics, propaganda, republicans, socialsecurity, SupremeCourt )

- 2086 days ago -
Unless someone snags an iPhone video of Obama taking a leak on Ohio State mascot Brutus Buckeye, or stealing pain meds from a Tampa retiree and sharing them with a bunch of Japanese car makers, the game looks pretty much up - Obama's widening leads in->

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Kit B (276)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 9:02 am
(David Calvert/Getty Images; Chris Schneider/Getty Images)

The press everywhere is buzzing this week with premature obituaries of the Romney campaign. New polls are out suggesting that Mitt Romney's electoral path to the presidency is all but blocked. Unless someone snags an iPhone video of Obama taking a leak on Ohio State mascot Brutus Buckeye, or stealing pain meds from a Tampa retiree and sharing them with a bunch of Japanese carmakers, the game looks pretty much up – Obama's widening leads in three battleground states, Virginia, Ohio and Florida, seem to have sealed the deal.

That's left the media to speculate, with a palpable air of sadness, over where the system went wrong. Whatever you believe, many of these articles say, wherever you rest on the ideological spectrum, you should be disappointed that Obama ultimately had to run against such an incompetent challenger. Weirdly, there seems to be an expectation that presidential races should be closer, and that if one doesn't come down to the wire in an exciting photo finish, we've all missed out somehow.

Frank Bruni of The New York Times wrote a thoughtful, insightful editorial today that blames the painful, repetitive and vacuous campaign process for thinning the electoral herd and leaving us with only automatons and demented narcissists willing to climb the mountain:

"Romney's bleeding has plenty to do with his intrinsic shortcomings and his shortsightedness: how does a man who has harbored presidential ambitions almost since he was a zygote create a paper trail of offshore accounts and tax returns like his?

But I wonder if we're not seeing the worst possible version of him, and if it isn't the ugly flower of the process itself. I wonder, too, what the politicians mulling 2016 make of it, and whether, God help us, we'll be looking at an even worse crop of candidates then."

The Times, meanwhile, ran a house editorial blaming Romney's general obliqueness, his willingness to stretch the truth and his inability to connect with ordinary people for his fall. David Brooks ran a column suggesting that Romney's overreliance on a message of strict market conservatism, ignoring the values message of "traditional" conservatism, was what killed him in the end.

All of these points of view have merit, I guess, but to me they're mostly irrelevant. The mere fact that Mitt Romney is even within striking distance of winning this election is an incredible testament to two things: a) the rank incompetence of the Democratic Party, which would have this and every other election for the next half century sewn up if they were a little less money-hungry and tried just a little harder to represent their ostensible constituents, and b) the power of our propaganda machine, which has conditioned all of us to accept the idea that the American population, ideologically speaking, is naturally split down the middle, whereas the real fault lines are a lot closer to the 99-1 ratio the Occupy movement has been talking about since last year.

Think about it. Four years ago, we had an economic crash that wiped out somewhere between a quarter to 40% of the world's wealth, depending on whom you believe. The crash was caused by an utterly disgusting and irresponsible class of Wall Street paper-pushers who loaded the world up with deadly leverage in pursuit of their own bonuses, then ran screaming to the government for a handout (and got it) the instant it all went south.

These people represent everything that ordinarily repels the American voter. They mostly come from privileged backgrounds. Few of them have ever worked with their hands, or done anything like hard work. They not only don't oppose the offshoring of American manufacturing jobs, they enthusiastically support it, financing the construction of new factories in places like China and India.

They've relentlessly lobbied the government to give themselves tax holidays and shelters, and have succeeded at turning the graduated income tax idea on its head by getting the IRS to accept a sprawling buffet of absurd semantic precepts, like the notions that "capital gains" and "carried interest" are somehow not the same as "income."

The people in this group inevitably support every war that America has even the slimmest chance of involving itself in, but neither they nor their children ever fight in these conflicts. They are largely irreligious and incidentally they do massive amounts of drugs, from cocaine on down, but almost never suffer any kind of criminal penalty for their behavior.

That last thing I would say is probably appropriate, except for the fact that hundreds of thousands of poor (and mostly black and Hispanic) kids get tossed by cops every year (would you believe 684,000 street stops in New York alone in 2011?) in the same city where Wall Street's finest work, and those kids do real time for possession of anything from a marijuana stem to an empty vial. How many Wall Street guys would you think would fill the jails if the police spent even one day doing aggressive, no-leniency stop-and-frisk checks outside the bars in lower Manhattan? How many Lortabs and Adderalls and little foil-wraps of coke or E would pop out of those briefcases?

For all this, when it came time to nominate a candidate for the presidency four years after the crash, the Republicans chose a man who in almost every respect perfectly represents this class of people. Mitt Romney is a rich-from-birth Ivy League product who not only has never done a hard day of work in his life – he never even saw a bad neighborhood in America until 1996, when he was 49 years old, when he went into some seedy sections of New York in search of a colleague's missing daughter ("It was a shocker," Mitt said. "The number of lost souls was astounding").

He has a $250 million fortune, but he appears to pay well under half the maximum tax rate, thanks to those absurd semantic distinctions that even Ronald Reagan dismissed as meaningless and counterproductive. He has used offshore tax havens for himself and his wife, and his company, Bain Capital, has both eliminated jobs in the name of efficiency (often using these cuts to pay for payments to his own company) and moved American jobs overseas.

The point is, Mitt Romney's natural constituency should be about 1% of the population. If you restrict that pool to "likely voters," he might naturally appeal to 2%. Maybe 3%.

If the clichés are true and the presidential race always comes down to which candidate the American people "wants to have a beer with," how many Americans will choose to sit at the bar with the coiffed Wall Street multimillionaire who fires your sister, unapologetically pays half your tax rate, keeps his money stashed in Cayman Islands partnerships or Swiss accounts in his wife's name, cheerfully encourages finance-industry bailouts while bashing "entitlements" like Medicare, waves a pom-pom while your kids go fight and die in hell-holes like Afghanistan and Iraq and generally speaking has never even visited the country that most of the rest of us call the United States, except to make sure that it's paying its bills to him on time?

Romney is an almost perfect amalgam of all the great out-of-touch douchebags of our national cinema: he's Gregg Marmalaard from Animal House mixed with Billy Zane's sneering, tux-wearing Cal character in Titanic to pussy-ass Prince Humperdinck to Roy Stalin to Gordon Gekko (he's literally Gordon Gekko). He's everything we've been trained to despise, the guy who had everything handed to him, doesn't fight his own battles and insists there's only room in the lifeboat for himself – and yet the Democrats, for some reason, have had terrible trouble beating him in a popularity contest.
****** continue reading at Visit Site with some fun pictures that accompany the article***

By Matt Tiabbli for Rolling Stone Magazine


Arielle S (313)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 11:44 am
Agree with all of the above - I just hope the voters don't get too sure of things and stay home. The GOP are not above lying, cheating, stealing or whatever else it might take to win and so it's not over til it's over....

Maggie S (40)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 12:37 pm
You have that right!!!! Romney will no doubt tell all of his lies - I think it is hysterical that he keeps saying Obama will lie! That is the funniest thing I have ever heard in my life! Romney is under huge pressure here, and, when Romney is under pressure, he gets snide and he will crack! It is what he does! Obama just has to tell the truth and give concise answers while Romney continues to give his flip flops, lies, and swallows his tongue! When this is over, it is ALL over, which it really is already! Sayonara Mitt you jackass!

Angelika R (143)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 1:26 pm
lol Maggie ^^ but agreed. THANK YOU MATT! FINALLY someone speaking it out clearly what many, me included, have been thinking and wondering about. Excellent look at the core of things, nicely written in the typical Matt language, long but worth every line, thanks Kit!

Angelika R (143)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 1:32 pm
question: that "E" in the paragraph about drugs the Wall st crooks "do" means what? Ecstasy?

JL A (281)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 2:03 pm
so sad that so much of America is apparently as uniformed or delusional as the facts presented would seem to indicate

Dee C (229)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 4:36 pm
I was just saying on another article how so many of the diehard republicans have turned to Obama..There really are very few who are with and for Mitt..And that is a very good thing..

Thanks kit as always a great article from you..

Kit B (276)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 5:18 pm

I guessing that the answer is yes, the E is for ecstasy, but to be honest I don't know, it was my guess when reading this. That was a few days ago when "Rolling Stone" arrived in my mail box. Matt Taibbi just tells it like it is, I'm glad he's around.

Obama/Biden --- 2012

Sheryl G (360)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 6:55 pm
Give the writer a standing ovation. I'm glad to see more and more writers as of late not mincing words anymore. I do not know what it's going to take to get some people to speak up to save their own arses, but I wish they would do so soon.

David C (129)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 7:30 pm
kudos to kit & matt t and for all the commentary!

David C (129)
Sunday September 30, 2012, 7:31 pm
forgot to say, absolutely this should never have been close......economy is better, wars winding down, health care, one man who has worked 4 yrs for all people as President vs one man who only cares water for the wealthy and GOP......

don't get complacent though, its not over until the electoral votes are counted........

Nancy M (169)
Monday October 1, 2012, 6:19 am
After the latest- that Taxes ARE charities, man, I don't know how anyone could vote for our correct republicans. My family sure has given up on them.

Nancy M (169)
Monday October 1, 2012, 6:21 am
Don't believe the polls, get out and vote.

Yvonne W (229)
Monday October 1, 2012, 1:55 pm
After the rip-off that put Bu$h Leaguers in power in the 2000 election - we can't depend on anything! That election should never have been that close either! (I don't believe it was! Or the 2004 for that matter!) The 2008 election was just too Over-whelming for the results to be tampered with - but how many State & Local results Were tampered with? 2010 certainly showed an up-tick in RepubliCON meddling again..VOTE!!!!!!!

marie C (163)
Monday October 1, 2012, 4:33 pm
Noted thanks

Past Member (0)
Monday October 1, 2012, 5:14 pm
Noted. Thanks.

Robert B (60)
Monday October 1, 2012, 6:22 pm
It is truly amazing that so many people are clueless about Mitt Robme and his band of Robber Barons. Everyone needs to read this article.

Kamila A (141)
Monday October 1, 2012, 11:38 pm
Matt Taibbi is writing the best articles on this presidential race I have ever read! The Rolling Stone article in the Sept 13th issue on Bain Capital and this one are absolutely on the mark with every point made, and should a Republican stumble upon one, they might just explode or find salvation.....either way, its a good thing :o) and I would encourage everyone to make copies and send them out (especially to those who have idiot family members still sending propaganda from the wrong side)......can't hurt, and might enlighten those who can take their eyes off FOX to read something.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in US Politics & Gov't

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.