START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

The Terrible Cost of Not Fixing the Filibuster Sooner


US Politics & Gov't  (tags: abuse, americans, congress, constitution, dishonesty, economy, elections, ethics, filibuster reform, freedoms, Govtfearmongering, lies, media, politics, propaganda, republicans, US Senate )

Kit
- 492 days ago - blog.ourfuture.org
There have been 380 filibusters in the Senate since 2010 and most people are not aware that these are not real filibusters. This demands real action. Let those who wish to filibuster follow the rules.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Kit B. (277)
Thursday December 13, 2012, 9:58 am
(Photo Credit: Senate.gov)

Senate Democrats were all about getting things done, and that kept them from getting anything done. They didn’t take on the filibuster head-on, so now obstruction is the expected norm. There have been more than 380 filibusters and the public (and apparently the media) doesn’t know there has been even one. It is time to MAKE THEM TALK if they want to filibuster a bill.
380 Filibusters – The Public Doesn’t Know

Under Lyndon Johnson there was one filibuster, and the public knew about it because a Senator had to talk all night. In the last few years there have just a few been more than one and the public doesn’t know about it at all. How many filibusters have there been? Harry Reid writes in Politico: “Since Democrats took control of the Senate in 2006, Republicans have mounted 380 filibusters.”

If you talk to the public you will find people do not know about this. Most people do not believe there has been even a single filibuster because they haven’t seen it happen. To the public a filibuster is a dramatic event, a big deal, involving Senators talking all night until they fall down from exhaustion.

Here’s the thing. The public hates obstruction, and would apply the right amount of pressure if they knew about it. That is how democracy is supposed to work. But the public does not know that obstruction is occurring. The silent filibuster tactic has been successful because people don’t see it. And that means that democracy isn’t working the way it should.
The Senate Made A Mistake

In the 1970s the Senate changed rules that required a filibuster to be a spectacle and a talkathon. Instead they wanted to be able to move on and get things done so the “silent filibuster” was enabled. Nobodye could have predicted that a corporate/conservative minority would later use the new “silent filibuster” tactic more than 380 times to keep anything from getting done. The filibuster is now so abused that the media tells the public that Senate rules require 60 votes to pass any bill.

Senate Democrats have been irresponsible in allowing this to continue, because democracy wants the public to be alerted to obstruction. In their wish to get things done and get along with the other side they have been accomplices in the obstruction strategy. They have resisted making a big deal out of each and every obstruction, resisted using theater tactics like “bringing out the cots,” resisted “making waves” by changing the rules, and tried to just keep the Senate moving along and getting along. But the result of accommodating the conservatives is they have enabled a take-no-prisoners minority to just block everything. Since the public is largely unaware of this minority obstruction they are not applying the pressure that a functioning democracy requires.

Basics:
People believe a filibuster is senators talking all night.

People have not seen any senators talking all night.

People do not believe there have been any filibusters.

But there have been more than 380 filibusters.

Democracy suffers because the public does not understand that these filibusters are occurring.
We, the People are not getting from our government what we want and need.

Conclusion: Make. Them. Talk.

A Simple Fix – Make Them Talk

Make. Them. Talk.

There is a simple fix that will stop obstruction — except when obstruction is appropriate. This simple fix is to change the rules back to what people think the rules already are: make them actually filibuster in the way the public understands. They should make them talk all night if they want to obstruct a bill.

Here is why making them talk all night is the best solution. While getting rid of the ability to silently and secretly obstruct action it retains the ability of the minority to make their point, and does it in a way that brings that point to the attention of the public. By killing the “silent filibuster” and making Senators engage in the public theater of a dramatic event, where they stand in the Senate chamber and talk and talk, Democrats can actually restore a functioning democracy and engage the public in our democracy.

But when something is happening that is truly egregious and the minority wants to bring the public’s attention to this, they can alert the press and their supporters and get started in a dramatic talk-all-night theater event. They can launch an actual filibuster, just like the movie. It will be big news. The news channels will all make a big deal of this, and people can contact each other and organize a response.

Making them talk gives the public time to get involved. In fact it invites the public to get involved. Or not. It gives the public the choice, which is why we have those first three words in our Constitution.

The Cost Of Filibuster Abuse

The core principle of our government is that We, the People make the decisions. We are supposed to have self-government by majority rule. But in the last few years this has been turned on its head by this silent filibuster obstruction. Nothing gets done, and the public doesn’t understand why not. The cost to We, the People has been staggering.

How many things that the people and our economy want and need have been blocked in the last few years? Well, aside from literally everything, I mean. This abuse of the rules even keep us from learning who or even what country (Disclose Act) is paying for the abuse of the rule.

Just a few examples: Here are just a few examples — just a few out of 380+ filibusters — from Dylan Matthews in the Washington Post, in 17 bills that likely would have passed the Senate if it didn’t have the filibuster,

DREAM Act

DISCLOSE Act

Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA)

Public option

Paycheck Fairness Act

Permanent middle-class Bush tax cut extension

Rescinding of the upper-income Bush tax cuts

Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act

Emergency Senior Citizens Relief Act

Creating American Jobs and Ending Offshoring Act

American Jobs Act

The Buffett rule

Teachers and First Responders Back to Work Act of 2011

Repeal Big Oil Tax Subsidies Act

“Shared Sacrifice”

Withholding Tax Relief Act of 2011

Burmese import restrictions

Appointments – [click through to see the whole list]

Again, those are just a few of the things that We, the People want and need, that were blocked by Republican filibusters. JOBS. The public option. Stopping tax breaks for outsourcing. Ending the huge tax breaks for the oil companies and the billionaires.

A big one: Labor: This week’s anti-union vote in Michigan shows us that one cost to We, the People was that reforming labor law was blocked. Blocked by filibuster in 2007, Senate Democrats dropped this in 2009 because it could not get past a nother filibuster — just one of 380.

June, 2007, GOP Senators Filibuster Employee Free Choice Act,

A majority of Senators voted in favor of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) today, but the vote was nine votes short of the 60-vote requirement to break a filibuster of the bill by a handful of obstructionist Senators.

Then in 2009, (again from 17 bills that likely would have passed the Senate if it didn’t have the filibuster above), Democrats were trying to get the Employee Free Choice Act passed,

But at the time, well over Democratic Senators had indicated their support of the bill, which also got 51 votes and passed the House in 2007, when Democrats had fewer seats, meaning it was especially likely to pass in 2009.

And of course, never forget climate change. Action has been obstructed and obstructed and obstructed…

So many solutions to our country’s problems have been obstructed by corporate&billionaire-funded minority filibusters!

Things You Can Do

Fist, be aware that the filibuster does exist and has been used 380 times, even though you haven’t seen anyone talking all night.

Call the offices of both of your state’s senators and tell them you want them to fix the filibuster and make them talk all night if they want to block a bill. You can use this number: 1-877-782-8274.

Visit Fix the Senate Now and sign up for updates.

There is a Fix the Senate Now Facebook page. “In the US Senate, back room deals and filibuster rules allow a handful of senators to stop the rest from making any progress. Let’s fix the Senate, now.”

Follow @FixTheSenate on Twitter.

Start your own Fix the Senate online petition; Use an online petition tool like SignOn.org to start your own petition to ask your Senators to reform the Senate rules. You can get ideas for language to use at http://fixthesenatenow.org/page/s/signthepetition/.

New Mexico Senator Tom Udall has a special Senate Rules: Common Sense Reform website with a lot of resources and recent press coverage, as well as all of Senator Udall’s past statements on rules reform.

Because it is time to Make. Them. Talk.
*****************

By Dave Johnson | Campaign for America's Future |
 

Kit B. (277)
Thursday December 13, 2012, 9:59 am


Correction: That should read 380 filibusters since 2006 and not 2010.
 

Jae A. (321)
Thursday December 13, 2012, 10:17 am
to get the lazy obstructionist back to working for the people again or to at least talk if wanting to filibuster. Lazy and obstructionist, looks like that's how the GOP plans to continue to roll. It's up to us to see that changes....like everything else they are suppose to be doing but aren't. ..and they get the pay checks.
 

Nancy M. (219)
Thursday December 13, 2012, 2:02 pm
380 filibusters? One every other day. I guess they are using that "My way or the highway" thing. Yeah Jae, take their pay checks and benefits. Works for me.
 

Yvonne White (232)
Thursday December 13, 2012, 2:37 pm
This is why people don't know RepubliCONs are Obstructionists - "Most people do not believe there has been even a single filibuster because they haven’t seen it happen. To the public a filibuster is a dramatic event, a big deal, involving Senators talking all night until they fall down from exhaustion."
And that makes it Easy for RepubliCONs to deny it! But it also makes it easy for Democrats to say "We Tried, but RepubliCONs wouldn't Let us do anything." That's bull$hit too!
"The public hates obstruction, and would apply the right amount of pressure if they knew about it. That is how democracy is supposed to work. But the public does not know that obstruction is occurring. The silent filibuster tactic has been successful because people don’t see it. And that means that democracy isn’t working the way it should." So Neither side is doing its job & we're still paying full wages for half-a$$ed "work"!!!!!!
 

Jennifer C. (172)
Thursday December 13, 2012, 4:22 pm
Noted. Thanks.
 

Angelika R. (143)
Thursday December 13, 2012, 6:13 pm
Did I hear "functioning democracy"?..... Oh well. I do remember there were a few petitions quite recently to fix the filibuster, don't remember if I sent them around.
If it weren't such a shame and outrage, one could laugh..
 

pam w. (187)
Thursday December 13, 2012, 6:18 pm
How to fix it NOW?
 

JL A. (269)
Thursday December 13, 2012, 10:55 pm
Wish we could get Jimmy Stewart to go to Congress to testify why he and Mr. Smith believe you should have to actually talk.......
 

jan b. (3)
Friday December 14, 2012, 2:49 am
When McConnell filibustered himself......that really showed us how the filibuster is a fraud.
 

John Gregoire (248)
Friday December 14, 2012, 6:41 am
We just watched LINCOLN, a great movie and I was reminded how it used to be. I wish we would return to that day when all Senators and representatives were required to be in their seats whenever the body was in session. That alone would end the current aberation they call filibuster. LINCOLN also reminded that it was northern Democrats who voted against the 13th Amendment. Why they wanted slavery to continue and the Republicans wanted it to stop makes for intersting history of these two useless parties.
 

Angelika R. (143)
Friday December 14, 2012, 6:47 am
Senate: Fix the filibuster

maybe try anyway..
 

Daniel Partlow (189)
Friday December 14, 2012, 6:49 am
We need this fixed NOW!!! This should never have been started. I don't even believe in fillibusters in general!
 

Mary Donnelly (44)
Saturday December 15, 2012, 12:21 pm
Thanks Kit--fascinating post.
 

Lois Jordan (55)
Saturday December 15, 2012, 5:32 pm
Thanks, Kit. Great info. Signed petition Angelika posted...much thanks! Have also signed some others. Making them actually speak to filibuster seems like a no-brainer to me. If Harry Reid wants to go for "majority rule" which would only need 51 votes for passage, I'm just wondering if he could institute that rule for one year only....
 

John S. (294)
Sunday December 16, 2012, 4:38 am
Don't have to change the rules, just don't cave in to the threat of a fillbuster. Inthe old days, both parties would work to get 60 votes, and it is still possible with the liberal republicans or the conservative democrats. But nobody is intersted in crafting laws anymore, everyone wants to win the political points game.
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.