Start A Petition

Toxic Green Slime: Coming to a Lake or Beach Near You?

Environment  (tags: animals, climate-change, CO2emissions, conservation, destruction, ecosystems, endangered, environment, energy, forests, globalwarming, habitatdestruction, healthconditions, oceans, nature, politics, pollution, research, science, Sustainabililty, trees, wa )

- 1908 days ago -
Blooms can occur when nitrogen and phosphorous from fertilizers run off into lakes, estuaries and other waters. (Phosphorous is more of a problem in lakes; nitrogen in coastal environments.)

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Kit B (276)
Wednesday April 3, 2013, 12:51 pm
Image: A record-breaking bloom of algae in Lake Erie in October, 2011 is seen in this Landsat-5 satellite image. The green scum is mostly Microcystis, which produces a liver toxin and can cause skin irritation. (Image: NASA)

Today, I thought I would advance the story by fleshing out some of the broader context.

“Several feet deep of green gunk on your shoreline certainly doesn’t do wonders for property values or your ability to enjoy the lakeshore,” says Anna Michalak, a researcher at the Carnegie Institution and the lead author of the study, published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. But she and other researchers agree that there are more reasons than that to care about the gunk: It can be toxic, and it is an increasing global problem.

Blooms can occur when nitrogen and phosphorous from fertilizers run off into lakes, estuaries and other waters. (Phosphorous is more of a problem in lakes; nitrogen in coastal environments.) Michalak and her research team documented what she called “a perfect storm of weather events and agricultural practices” that triggered Lake Erie’s biggest bloom ever. And also how climate change could make such events more frequent. For the details, I encourage you to see Breanna Draxler’s story from yesterday.

As Michalak and her colleagues pointed out in their paper, this kind of problem is increasing all around the world. Much of the world’s population, and agricultural production, is concentrated near the coasts, she points out. “And as more and more land is used more intensely for agriculture, we’re seeing an increased issue with nutrient loading into coastal systems.”

Alan Townsend, an expert in biogeochemistry and ecosystem ecology at the University of Colorado, Boulder (and a colleague of mine here), concurs. “In recent decades, algal blooms have been increasing in severity and frequency in many parts of the world — and not just the U.S. and Europe,” he says. In an email to me, he continued:

China is a big one, with some nasty documented cases and undoubtedly many more that have not hit the global radar. Toxic blooms have also occurred in several parts of Latin America, perhaps most notably Brazil. Some of these have resulted in people dying. Canada has also had problems — e.g Lake Winnipeg, among others.

When big blooms of algae die, they sink, and the organisms that decompose them use up oxygen in the water. The process is known as “eutrophication,” and the plunge in oxygen levels is called “hypoxia.”

“This is harmful to fisheries and other aquatic life,” Michalak notes. But algae blooms also can have a direct economic impact. For example, during the massive 2011 bloom in Lake Erie, the city of Toledo, which draws drinking water from the lake, had to spend several thousand dollars extra each day to treat it.

“These blooms in particular are hazardous, because they involve a specific cyanobacteria called Microcystis that releases a compound that is toxic to the liver,” she says. Another species releases a neurotoxin.

“With the mess made within Lake Erie, we may have been 100 to a thousand-fold above international standards for these toxins,” she says. Thus the need for more expensive water treatment efforts during the bloom.

Michalak cautions against simply looking for villains. Fertilizer has become essential in feeding a growing global population. And, in fact, her research revealed that reduced-tillage agriculture, introduced to lower the amount of climate-altering carbon that is emitted from the soils of agricultural fields into the atmosphere, has had the unintended consequence of increasing the runoff of nutrients into Lake Erie.

“Sometimes the things we do for the best possible reasons turn out to have negative consequences,” she notes.

Another contributing factor has been the big push to grow corn — a fertilizer-intensive crop — to make ethanol for supplementing gasoline.

But this is not one of those environmental problems that should cause us to despair. As Alan Townsend points out, it is not at all intractable:

Many of our modern agricultural systems are far from optimized in terms of maximizing the food gain from fertilizers while minimizing the loss to the environment. Doing better here would actually increase food security, save money, and lessen growing environmental and economic risks posed by nitrogen and phosphorous pollution. And we can do better — much of this is not a matter of pie-in-the-sky inventions of the future. With proper will and policies in place, most of the world’s major breadbaskets could greatly improve their N and P use efficiency in ways that would be win-win scenarios, at least in the longer run.

By Tom Yulsman | Discover Magazine |

Darren Woolsey (218)
Wednesday April 3, 2013, 1:01 pm
Thanks for sharing (an education!) this. . . .Another good example of why fertilizers are a bad thing.

Tim C (2420)
Wednesday April 3, 2013, 1:13 pm

JL A (281)
Wednesday April 3, 2013, 2:13 pm
Looking at things in isolation so often leads to ghastly unintended consequences...

Angelika R (143)
Wednesday April 3, 2013, 2:20 pm
YUCK--now if that were just algae they could make energy from it..but this toxic junk is a pest and not only should you do better but to live up to your claims and aims and DO BEST !

Nancy M (169)
Wednesday April 3, 2013, 3:19 pm
It seems we don't need bioterrorism, we just do it to ourselves.

Very interesting article Kit. Thanks.

Yvette Fouche (0)
Wednesday April 3, 2013, 3:57 pm
We don't need fertilizer. Pest and weed are just living creatures that we don't want and have no problem killing; Even activists don't care.

Lois Jordan (63)
Wednesday April 3, 2013, 5:16 pm
Noted. Thanks for the info, Kit.

pam w (139)
Wednesday April 3, 2013, 10:31 pm

greenplanet e (155)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 2:08 am
Ugh, eek, argh! Another reason to cut back on artificial fertilizers.

Ben O (150)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 3:57 am
We had that freaking slime (algae bloom) in the ocean here a few years ago...disgusting!

Ramu Reddy (8)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 4:42 am

Kerrie G (116)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 4:53 am
Noted, thanks.

Ro H (0)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 7:03 am

TOM TREE (246)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 7:34 am
Awesome article & Thanks for sharing this

Jo S (619)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 8:18 am
This is a problem that is happening as we speak, it should not be debated about until it fades from the front burner or happens again. We should demand that it be FIXED NOW! Start sending out the fines, close the the companies that are causing this problem & don't let them re-open until the problem is completely taken care of 100%! I'm really pissed now!
Thank you Kit for a great education.

Munro Tapper (80)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 11:27 am
I need to ask the same question. What is the ratio between people working on destroying the planet and all living beings and people involved in any other pursuit?

I do not to know the answer to my question. I am glad I have Miss Kitty's articles to read.

I find solace in Care 2.

On a more positive note: April Food's Day will never ever arrive on Friday the 13th.

Angelflowers D (85)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 3:30 pm

Theodore Shayne (56)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 4:03 pm
Noted & tweeted.

Bryna Pizzo (139)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 5:29 pm
Sickening! TY, N, P

Tamara Hayes (185)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 6:25 pm
Seems like we are screwed no matter what way we turn. Very informative article Kit. Thanks.

Fiona Ogilvie (565)
Thursday April 4, 2013, 6:51 pm
And again, Miss Kitty, you seem to have found my panic button.
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Environment

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.