START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Crisis of Humanity: Global Capitalism Breeds 21st Century Fascism


Business  (tags: abuse, americans, business, capitalism, consumers, corporate, corruption, dishonesty, economy, fascism, finance, government, investors, labor, law, lies, marketing, money, politics, society )

Kit
- 359 days ago - truth-out.org
This is an extremely important moment: the point where, the repertoire of hegemony through consent having been exhausted, the drift towards the routine use of the more repressive features of the state comes more and more prominently into play.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Kit B. (277)
Monday August 26, 2013, 3:21 pm
Image Credit: Jared Rodriguez / Truthout



In "Policing the Crisis," the classic 1978 study conducted by noted socialist and cultural theorist Stuart Hall and several colleagues, the authors show how the restructuring of capitalism as a response to the crisis of the 1970s - which was the last major crisis of world capitalism until the current one hit in 2008 - led in the United Kingdom and elsewhere to an "exceptional state," by which they meant a situation in which there was an ongoing breakdown of consensual mechanisms of social control and a growing authoritarianism. They wrote:


This is an extremely important moment: the point where, the repertoire of hegemony through consent having been exhausted, the drift towards the routine use of the more repressive features of the state comes more and more prominently into play. Here the pendulum within the exercise of hegemony tilts, decisively, from that where consent overrides coercion, to that condition in which coercion becomes, as it were, the natural and routine form in which consent is secured. This shift in the internal balance of hegemony - consent to coercion - is a response, within the state, to increasing polarization of class forces (real and imagined). It is exactly how a 'crisis of hegemony' expresses itself the slow development of a state of legitimate coercion, the birth of a 'law and order' society the whole tenor of social and political life has been transformed by [this moment]. A distinctively new ideological climate has been precipitated (Policing the Crisis, pp. 320-321).

This is an accurate description of the current state of affairs. We are witnessing transitions from social-welfare states to social-control states around the world. We are facing a global crisis that is unprecedented, given its magnitude, its global reach, the extent of ecological degradation and social deterioration, and the sheer scale of the means of violence. We truly face a crisis of humanity; we have entered a period of great upheavals, of momentous changes and uncertainties. This systemwide crisis is distinct from earlier such episodes of world crisis in the 1930s or the 1970s precisely because world capitalism is fundamentally different in the early 21st century.

Among the qualitative shifts that have taken place in the capitalist system in the face of globalization in recent decades, there are four I want to underscore. First is the rise of truly transnational capital and the integration of every country into a new globalized production and financial system. Second is the appearance of a new transnational capitalist class (TCC). This is a class group grounded in new global circuits of accumulation rather than the older national circuits. Third is the rise of what I term transnational state apparatuses. And fourth is the appearance of novel relations of inequality and domination in global society, including an increasing importance of transnational social and class inequalities relative to North-South inequalities.

The current crisis

At the same time, the current crisis shares several aspects with earlier structural crises of the 1970s and the 1930s, but also several features unique to present:


The system is fast reaching the ecological limits of its reproduction. We have already reached several of what environmental scientists refer to as "tipping points." This dimension cannot be underestimated.

The sheer magnitude of the means of violence and social control, as well as the magnitude of and the extent of control over the means of global communications and the production and circulation of symbols and images. In this regard, we are witness to frightening new systems of social control and repression that we need to analyze and to resist.

We are reaching limits to the extensive expansion of capitalism, in the sense that there are no longer any new territories of significance to be integrated into world capitalism. De-ruralization is now well-advanced, and the commodification of the countryside and of pre- and non-capitalist spaces has intensified - converted in hot-house fashion into spaces of capital so that intensive expansion is reaching depths never before seen.

The rise of a vast "surplus" population inhabiting a "planet of slums," alienated from the productive economy, thrown into the margins and subject to sophisticated systems of social control and to destruction, to a mortal cycle of dispossession, exploitation and exclusion.

The disjuncture between a globalizing economy and a nation-state-based system of political authority. Transnational state apparatuses are incipient. They have not been able to play the role of what scholars of the world capitalist system refer to as a "hegemon" or a leading nation-state with enough power and authority to organize and stabilize the system.

With this as context, let us review how the current crisis has developed. Emergent transnational capital underwent a major expansion in the 1980s and 1990s. This involved what we could call hyper-accumulation, achieved through a number of factors. These include the introduction of new technologies, above all through computerization, informatics and the internet. They also include neo-liberal policies that opened up the world to transnational capital, and new modalities of mobilizing and exploiting the global labor force, including a massive new round of "primitive accumulation" - the uprooting and displacement of hundreds of millions of people, especially in the Third World countryside, who have become internal and transnational migrants.

But by the late 1990s, stagnation in the global economy set in. The system was again facing renewed crisis. Sharp global social polarization and escalating inequalities worldwide fueled the chronic problem of "overaccumulation." Quite simply, global inequalities and the impoverishment of broad majorities mean that transnational capital cannot find productive outlets to unload the enormous amounts of surplus it has accumulated. By the start of the 21st century, the Transnational Capitalist Class turned to several mechanisms to sustain global accumulation (profit-making) in the face of stagnation and overaccumulation.

One of the mechanisms is what I term militarized accumulation. This involves making wars and undertaking interventions that unleash cycles of destruction and reconstruction, and generate enormous profits for an ever-expanding "military-prison-industrial-security-energy-financial complex." We are now living in a global war economy that goes well beyond such "hot wars" as in Iraq, Afghanistan or Syria. Another mechanism is the raiding and sacking of public budgets. The Transnational Capitalist Class uses its financial power to take control of state finances and impose further austerity on working majorities. The Transnational Capitalist Class employs its structural power (its control over the global economy) to accelerate the dismantling of what remains of the social wage and welfare states. And a third mechanism is frenzied worldwide financial speculation - turning the global economy into a giant casino. The TCC has unloaded trillions of dollars into speculation in housing and real estate markets, into food, energy and other global commodities markets, into bond markets worldwide (that is, into public budgets and state finances) and into every imaginable derivative.

The threat of "21st century fascism"

How have social and political forces worldwide responded to crisis? The crisis has resulted in a rapid political polarization in global society. Right- and left-wing forces are ascendant. Among others, I want to highlight three responses to the crisis that seem to be in dispute.

One is what we could call "reformism from above." This reformism is aimed at stabilizing the system, at saving the system from itself and from more radical responses from below. Nonetheless, in the years following the 2008 collapse of the global financial system, it seems these reformers are unable (or unwilling) to prevail over the power of transnational financial capital. A second response is popular, grass-roots and leftist resistance from below. As social and political conflict escalates around the world, there appears to be a mounting global revolt. While such resistance appears insurgent in the wake of 2008, it is spread very unevenly across countries and regions and faces many problems and challenges.

Yet another response is what I term 21st century fascism. The ultra-right is an insurgent force in many countries. In broad strokes, this project seeks to fuse reactionary political power with transnational capital and to organize a mass base among historically privileged sectors of the global working class such as white workers in the North and middle layers in the South that are now experiencing heightened insecurity and the specter of downward mobility. It involves militarism, extreme masculinization, homophobia, racism and a racist mobilization against scapegoats, which includes the search for scapegoats (such as immigrant workers and, in the West, Muslims). Twenty-first century fascism evokes mystifying ideologies, often involving race/culture supremacy and xenophobia, embracing an idealized and mythical past. Neo-fascist culture normalizes and glamorizes warfare and social violence, indeed, generates a fascination with domination that is even portrayed as heroic.

It is important to stress that the need for dominant groups around the world to secure widespread, organized mass social control of the world's surplus population and rebellious forces from below gives a powerful impulse to projects of 21st century fascism. Simply put, the immense structural inequalities of the global political economy cannot easily be contained through consensual mechanisms of social control, that is, through hegemonic domination. With this in mind, let us conclude with five points for ongoing debate with regard to policing global capitalism.

A global police state

First, policing global capitalism through new modalities of globalized social control and repression is absolutely not just a project of this 21st century fascism; in fact, it is advanced by liberal and reformist elites and states. It is a structural, system-maintenance imperative of global capitalism.

Second,in thinking about policing global capitalism, we should ask whom the system most needs to police. Here, I want to call attention to the rising tide of surplus labor. Instead of attempting to incorporate those marginalized, the system tries to isolate and neutralize their real or potential rebellion by criminalizing the poor and the dispossessed, with tendencies toward genocide in some cases. The mechanisms of coercive exclusion include mass incarceration and prison-industrial complexes; pervasive policing; repressive anti-immigrant legislation; manipulation of space in new ways so that both gated communities and ghettos are controlled by armies of private security guards and technologically advanced surveillance systems; ideological campaigns aimed at seduction; and passivity through petty consumption and fantasy.

New forms of social control and modalities of ideological domination blur boundaries, so that there may be a constitutional and normalized neo-fascism, with formal representative institutions, a constitution, political parties and elections, while the political system is tightly controlled by transnational capital and its representatives. Any dissent that threatens the system is neutralized if not liquidated.

Third, we must recognize that criminalization and militarized control of the structurally marginalized as mechanisms of pre-emptive containment is highly racialized. This brings us back to Stuart Hall and in colleagues. The authors of "Policing the Crisis" highlighted the highly racialized nature of policing and the criminalization of black and immigrant communities in the United Kingdom. They deconstructed the complex ideological process of fabricating the criminalization of the oppressed as a function of social control at moments of hegemonic crisis.

Here we see strong parallels between the incipient "exceptional state" in the 1970s and the current drift toward such states in the United States and elsewhere. The displacement of social anxieties to crime and racialized "criminalized" populations in the United States and elsewhere dates back to the 1970s crisis. In the United States, in the wake of the mass rebellions of the 1960s, dominant groups promoted systematic cultural and ideological "law and order" campaigns to legitimize the shift from a social welfare to a social control state and the rise of a prison-industrial complex.

"Law and order" came to mean the reconstruction and reinforcing of racialized social hierarchies and hegemonic order in the wake of the 1960s rebellions. This coincided with global economic restructuring, neo-liberalism and capitalist globalization from the 1970s and on. Now, criminalization helps displace social anxieties resulting from the structurally violent disruption of stability, security and social organization generated by the current crisis. In her shocking expose, The New Jim Crow, legal scholar Michelle Alexander documents mass incarceration in United States as "a stunningly comprehensive and well-disguised system of racialized social control." Indeed, the racialized nature of the bogus "drug wars," of mass caging and the social death sentences this hands down is so blatant it shocks the senses. In analytical abstraction, mass incarceration takes the place of concentration camps. The system subjects a surplus and potentially rebellious population of millions to concentration, caging and state violence. The so-called (and declared) "war on drugs" and "war on terrorism," as well as the undeclared "war on gangs," "war on immigrants" and "war on poor youth," must be placed in this context.

Fourth, in his brilliant yet chilling study Cities under Siege: the New Military Urbanism, Stephen Graham shows how structures and processes of permanent militarized social control systems and warfare constitute a global project that by definition is transnational. It is important to note that every country has become enmeshed in policing the global crisis as the global economy becomes ever-more invested in warfare, social violence and state-organized coercion and repression.

Fifth and finally, militarization and organized violence become accumulation strategies independent of any political objectives and appear as structural features of the new global capitalism. Wars, mass incarceration systems, militarizing borders, detaining immigrants, developing global surveillance systems - so forth, and so on - are immensely profitable for the global corporate economy, for the transnational corporations, the transnational bankers, investors and speculators. They have a material stake in defending and expanding a global police state. Popular forces from below must be aware of what they are up against, and of the need for fundamental change in the power and property relations of global capitalism, if peace and justice are to be achieved.
*****

By: William I Robinson | Truthout |

The ideas in this essay are developed in more detail in William I. Robinson, Global Capitalism, Global Crisis, to be published in 2014 by Cambridge University Press. This article is based on a speech given at the Conference on Power in Justice in New York.
 

JL A. (275)
Monday August 26, 2013, 3:33 pm
Some of the earlier mechanisms of this in the US were mandatory minimum sentencing and Three Strikes initiatives in the criminal justice system coupled with contracting out prison services to fuel the profit king.
 

GGmaSheila D. (152)
Monday August 26, 2013, 7:21 pm
This is truly scary to me...Noted, not sure if thanks tho.
 

Helen Porter (40)
Monday August 26, 2013, 7:31 pm
These times of crisis either make us or break us.

We must face the consequences of our personal and national decisions and actions.

If we do this successfully, our future will be the peace we have always said we wanted.
Words are only words until they evolve into action. Then they can create a new reality.
 

Kit B. (277)
Monday August 26, 2013, 7:46 pm

This does happen over and over in history when there is deep financial crisis. We have many modern examples some more well known than others, Russia and Stalin, Italy and Mussolini, and of course Germany and Hitler. No, I do not believe we are heading in that direction, but we do have to be aware and pay attention to what is going on.
 

Helen Porter (40)
Monday August 26, 2013, 8:01 pm
Kit, I deeply admire your intellectual writings.

Thank you for acknowledging my scriblings with a green star.
It means much to me,
 

. (0)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 7:15 am
Very interesting, Kit. Thanks for sharing.
 

Micheael Kirkbym (85)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 10:35 am
It kind of gives a new meaning to the 2002 UN conference wherein they bluntly stated their intentions for humanity: 90% reduction of humanity on a global basis by any means necessary. This is why we have such surplus population who work for pittances and have no health care and little education. It is what the Big Six want. Globalization birthed this global Corporatist Frankenchild. Outsourcing was merely another way to weaken the West and to destabilize it while redistributing their wealth to supposedly developing nations. The only people who benefited were the Big Six; their 200+ subsidiary corporations and all those connected to them and subservient to them. Bill Gates and all like him certainly believe this and support the thrust to 10 economic spheres; a new currency and if they get their way - total control over the whole planet. They think they are gods after all.
The rest of us are merely an inconvenience who they hope will be reduced to controllable and programmable levels. Fascism by any nomenclature is still fascism and the masses are the experiment.
 

Robert O. (12)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 10:52 am
Symptoms of a world gone completely mad. I fear for humanity. Thanks Kit.
 

Lois Jordan (54)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 1:50 pm
Thanks for posting this extremely well-written article that is also somewhat terrifying. The global pursuit of power, wealth and control by the few are going to cost many their lives. Mainstream media reports this in bits and pieces, as they are also corrupted by corporate overlords. Although the author mentioned transnational corporations, I was somewhat surprised that he didn't mention the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and how deadly it will be for so many.
Michael K (above) also referenced the Big Six, which are heartless, soul-less, cold-blooded and calculating. If they get their way, this will no longer be Mother Earth, it will be Nazi Planet From Hell.
 

Mike M. (55)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 3:27 pm
They will eventually gain control. This has been laid out and worked into the mainstream media and the people are obsessed with just trying to live or party they can not see what is happening in front of them
 

Theodore Shayne (56)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 3:52 pm
This has been the plan for at least the last 200+ years and possibly more.
 

Roger Garin-michaud (61)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 4:21 pm
noted, thanks
 

Mary Donnelly (47)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 4:36 pm
Thanks Kit. This kind of article needs more publicity, because many people do not understand that these trends are happening.
 

Past Member (0)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 5:52 pm
Never in human history has empire been so vast and on such a scale as it is today. Global fascism has reached new peaks, unimaginable even to Hitler in 1942. It is only a matter of time before drones, and other high tech military weapons, are used for political ends even in America, just to maintain order through fear and deadly force.
 

Jennifer C. (172)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 5:59 pm
Thanks.
 

Lona Goudswaard (68)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 7:06 pm
Thanks Kit, for an excellent piece of writing. It is highly disturbing as so much of its content rings true and because we have seen it happen time and time again, as you mentioned. But I agree, It'll not come to this in the end. No further expansion is possible if global capitalism is a fact and thus having lost its reason to be, it will implode.

Fascist Germany, Italy and Japan would never have conquered the whole world, the alliance between Germany and Italy was already showing signs of severe strain before they were defeated.
 

Twyla Sparks (208)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 9:00 pm
Thanks( I think)
 

june t. (65)
Tuesday August 27, 2013, 10:43 pm
thanks - well worth reading.
 

Ljiljana Milic (100)
Wednesday August 28, 2013, 3:20 am
Carefully read & Duly noted & Thank you Kit.
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.