START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Five Years on: The Lessons of Lehman


Business  (tags: Americans, bankruptcy, business, consumers, corporate, corruption, debt, dishonesty, economy, ethics, finance, government, investments, money, politics, society )

Kit
- 379 days ago - america.aljazeera.com
Commentary: The enduring lesson of Lehman Brothers is to abandon lust for credit-driven economic growth.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Kit B. (276)
Sunday September 15, 2013, 8:43 am
Photo Credit: Oli Scarff/Getty Images



On Sept. 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers -- the fourth-largest investment bank in the U.S. at the time -- filed for bankruptcy, accelerating the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

Five years later, has the American economy recovered? Not unless you consider the Dow Jones Industrial Average to be the one true marker of health. Unemployment remains high, construction moribund, growth sluggish, foreclosures rife. Meanwhile the wider so-called “advanced” (the better word would be “decaying”) world divides between large countries that have at best stabilized, and the other ones -- Cyprus, Greece, Portugal, Ireland, and perhaps Spain -- that verge on collapse.

Why has the economy failed to recover? As usual, economists are divided. Keynesians argue that governments have not pumped enough “stimulus” into the economy through public spending and tax relief. Their opponents, the “austerians,” blame weak fiscal discipline, which supposedly depresses confidence and credit markets. But what passes these days for a Keynesian case takes no account of the special character of the financial crisis that Lehman's failure kicked off. And the austerians have dishonest sponsors, who really seek a new assault on social insurance programs, on public services, and on safety, health and environmental protections.

Both sides miss the crucial lessons of the crisis, which go beyond the fact that it exposed the instability and corruption of the megabanks. The meltdown also showed that the economic growth enjoyed by the prior generation, which was driven by waves of speculation, was unsustainable and cannot now be repeated. It revealed that the conditions for steady, high growth -- which we enjoyed in the postwar era and have come to expect by force of habit -- no longer exist.

What happened? History and a global view can help us understand. Let us divide the postwar years into three phases. The first is 1945–1969, when the entire world economy, including the Soviet bloc but not China, grew and developed more-or-less steadily. The second is 1970-2000, when after the oil shocks growth resumed in the rich countries, and then in China and India, but not in Latin America, Africa, the then-Soviet empire, much of Southeast Asia or the Middle East. The third phase is 2000 to the present, the years of instability, crisis and now stagnation for the entire finance-driven economic world.

What demarcates these phases? The first was a time of cheap and easy resources, and of balanced public-private backing for the growth of demand. In these years demand and supply grew together, worldwide, and poor countries grew along with the rich. The second phase began with oil shocks, but then the rich countries used their financial power, through high interest rates and debt crises, to deflate world resource demand and energy prices. Thus the rich grew and the poor did not, and rising inequality illustrated the fact that growth was no longer shared. In the third phase, credit-fueled growth faltered with the NASDAQ Stock Market bust of 2000–2002 and the corporate accounting scandals (Enron, Tyco, WorldCom) that followed. Then came the boom in corrupt mortgage lending, which concluded with the Lehman crisis. Liars' loans, in which mortgages were packaged with no documentation of credit worthiness, were a Lehman specialty.

Now five years after Lehman the U.S. faces four barriers to renewed growth:

First, a choke-chain effect of high and volatile energy prices has transformed and will continue to transform growth of total spending by energy consumers into royalties for the producers and into inflated profits generated from inventories. This is good for the Saudis and for speculators, but for the U.S. and Europe it stifles business investments and drains the purchasing power that government stimulus injects.

Second, U.S. military might, which has in the past been used to ensure a low cost of oil, minerals and food, has lost its power. Force can no longer effectively to keep resources cheap for the world's rich. Everyone who saw what happened in Iraq and Afghanistan knows this -- including the U.S. military, whose leaders saw the reality of modern war first-hand.

Third, the digital revolution has made much human labor redundant. Electronics are doing to the office worker what long ago the internal combustion engine did to the horse. But downsized office workers, unlike horses, still need useful jobs and they need to be fed, housed and cared-for in illness and old age.

Fourth, the big bankers are entrenched and operate with impunity. They cannot be induced by favor or fear or fine words from President Obama to revive the economy. Yet their political influence blocks the government from doing directly what the financial industry refuses to do, namely lend to productive projects. Franklin Deleano Roosevelt in 1933 had a great advantage over Obama: he owed nothing to bankers, and they did not own the Congress.

Under such conditions, a return to rapid growth is unrealistic. In fact, an obsession with unachievable goals may lead us to policies that are increasingly desperate and destructive. By reaching for too rapid growth, we court the risk of snake-oil remedies, both dangerous and ineffective. To maintain slow growth will be hard enough. And let us hope we can do that much, because slow is better than zero, and markets can translate stagnation into collapse.

Granted, some of the barriers to growth could be lowered. Even now, shale gas is giving North America some respite on resources -- for how long, no one knows. The banks, now serving no useful function, could be downsized, though given their power it would take a political upheaval. Large parts of the military will never be used again and might be abolished. Well, best not to plan on much of that.

Realistically, we need to think how to live decently on what we have. For this we need more, not fewer, shared public goods and social protections. Public insurance programs -- for retirement, health, housing and bank deposits -- are not a burden; they are a necessity. Public education, infrastructure and the effective regulation of health and product safety and of the environment are not liabilities, but precious assets. If kept, they will remain to protect basic living standards, long after all the growth-dependent chimeras of self-financed schooling, privately funded health care, privatized retirement savings and race-to-the-bottom “competitiveness policy” have flitted away.

Meanwhile livable cities, care for the aged, energy conservation and climate change are among the most pressing issues. There is work to do, and underemployed people to do it, as Keynes said many years ago. Bringing them together is possible, necessary and urgent.

Five years after Lehman, we should give our obsession with credit-driven economic growth -- with faster growth for its own sake -- a rest. As Roosevelt abandoned the gold standard, so we must abandon the growth standard. Let us instead protect what we have, improve what we can and try to solve the concrete problems of our age.
*****

by James K. Galbraith |Al Jazeera America |
 

JL A. (275)
Sunday September 15, 2013, 11:51 am
Sad that we are dependent on those who don't want to learn from history to protect us from repeats.
 

Theodore Shayne (56)
Sunday September 15, 2013, 12:44 pm
Noted. Supposedly there is one scheduled for Dec. 2013 and it's supposed to be worse than 2008. At least that's the opinion of certain economists.
 

Elizabeth Baldwin (1)
Monday September 16, 2013, 3:47 am
Ridiculous.
 

Brian M. (191)
Monday September 16, 2013, 2:20 pm
It is worrisome that the only lesson the corporate elites both in business and in government appear to have learned is that they can get away with just about anything and not face real consequences...and if anything goes wrong, they can just demand a bailout and expect to get it. The rest of us are not so lucky.
 

GGmaSheila D. (170)
Monday September 16, 2013, 5:52 pm
Sigh...what does one say to the unvarnished truth, especially when one, like me, can do absolutely nothing about it - except cast one vote and pray to any higher power that may be listening??
 

Julia R. (294)
Monday September 16, 2013, 5:55 pm
Great analysis of what caused our big economic collapse namely a credit-driven economy with faster growth for its own sake which benefited the very rich rather than an economy which would really have been a productive economy that would have benefited the majority of people. But, unfortunately corporate greed backed by politicians and their loyalty to the status quo will not bring about effective change and bring about the economic recovery that we really need!
 

Esther Z. (101)
Monday September 16, 2013, 8:40 pm
I'm just glad Larry Summers withdrew his bid for the Federal Reserve Chairman appointment, or we had been facing an economic collapse redux!
 

Katie D. (84)
Monday September 16, 2013, 8:59 pm
Oh yes we DO NOT want this to happen again, So glad Larry Summer's has withdrawn we don't know what we would have been up against next!
Thank You Kit!!
 

Patricia H. (468)
Tuesday September 17, 2013, 1:25 am
noted
 

Robert O. (12)
Wednesday September 18, 2013, 11:17 pm
Have they (those in power, corporate mucky mucks, etc.) really learned or is history doomed to repeat itself? I wonder. Thanks Kit.
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.