START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

The Arctic Ocean Diaries: Dispatch No. 5


Science & Tech  (tags: ocean, Arctic, climate change, research, study, scientists, science, environment, investigation )

JL
- 704 days ago - motherjones.com
journey aboard the the US Coast Guard icebreaker Healy, following a team of scientists who are investigating how a changing climate might be affecting the chemistry of ocean and atmosphere in the Arctic.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

JL A. (275)
Monday October 15, 2012, 7:09 am
[Note: pictures of the equipment and links to prior Dispatches available at the site]


Mother Jones
The Arctic Ocean Diaries: Dispatch No. 5
On a cold windy day, it's time to do some science.

By Julia Whitty | Fri Oct. 12, 2012 3:00 AM PDT

View from the Bridge of the deck of Healy in the Arctic Ocean. Julia Whitty View from the Bridge of the deck of Healy in the Arctic Ocean. Julia Whitty


The Arctic Ocean Diaries

Dispatch 1: And We're Off [1]
Dispatch 2: Thar She Blows! [2]
Dispatch 3: Bows and Arrows [3]
Dispatch 4: Northern Lights [4]
Dispatch 5: Chemistry of the Sea [5]

Editor's note: Julia Whitty is on a three-week-long journey aboard the the US Coast Guard icebreaker Healy, following a team of scientists who are investigating how a changing climate might be affecting the chemistry of ocean and atmosphere in the Arctic.

Yesterday we reached our first work station in the northern Chukchi Sea off Cape Barrow, Alaska. For the first time it really felt like what I imagined the Arctic Ocean would be: cold, windy, slate gray.

CTD swinging off Healy on a deck winch JuliaCTD swinging off Healy on a deck winch Julia Whitty



Most of yesterday's work involved launching and retrieving the CTD off the ship with the help of a deck winch (photo above), and sending it down as far as 2,625 feet (800 meters) deep.

Map of first hydrographic stations Julia WhittyMap of first hydrographic stations Julia Whitty

This was done over and over again as we began to work the hydrographic stations running in a V-shaped line across roughly 210 miles (339 km)—from the outer edge of the Alaskan shelf, veering west across the Harriet Bank, then back east towards shallow water near shore. There are 20 CTD stations on this line, between 3 and 6 miles (5-10 kilometers) apart.

Jeremy Mathis (center) and others get ready to take samples from the CTD just brought back aboard from its trip to the bottom. Julia WhittyJeremy Mathis (center) and others get ready to take samples from the CTD just brought back aboard from its trip to the bottom. Julia Whitty

So what is a CTD? It stands for conductivity-temperature-depth profiler, a throwback to early oceanography when those properties were all that were being measured. Nowadays it measures a whole lot more.

But basically it's a bundle of instruments and water bottles that is sent to the bottom (or some predetermined depth shy of the bottom) on a cable, which collects data on the way up and down and collects water samples on the way up. The whole contraption is called a package and is composed of several parts.

Part one is the sensors, located in the bottom of the package, which measure various parameters of sea water: temperature, oxygen, salinity, depth, pressure, chlorophyll, particles, and light penetration.

Incoming CTD data play across the science network aboard Healy so you can check in almost anywhere. the bottom. Julia WhittyIncoming CTD data play across the science network aboard Healy so you can check in almost anywhere. the bottom. Julia Whitty

Data from these sensors are continually fed up to the ship's computer network through a coaxial cable. Which means I can sit in my cabin and watch the data rolling in on my laptop. Pretty cool.

Laurie Juranek collecting samples from the Niskin bottles. Julia WhittyLaurie Juranek collecting samples from the Niskin bottles. Julia Whitty

Part two of the package are the gray tubes known as Niskin bottles, arranged in a ring, or rosette. There are 24 bottles on this rosette, each capable of capturing 5.28 gallons (20 liters) of water. The bottles descend empty and are individually fired to open at predetermined depths on the way up. So the first bottle will capture water at the bottom of the cast and the last one will capture at the surface.

In general, fewer Niskin bottles are fired in the deeper parts of the cast, since deep water tends to be more stable. As the package nears the surface Niskins are fired more frequently, since the shallow water is where so much of the action is happening.

What is the action? Well, it's the processes that affect the surface layers of the ocean far more than the depths. Some of these processes come from the land, like river flows and coastal erosion (which introduce different chemistry into the water). Some come from above, like rain and sunlight. Some come from the primary producers, the phytoplankton (the tiny drifting plants of the sea that convert light into energy and make the life that feeds everything else). Some come from the animal life of the ocean, beginning with zooplankton (the tiny drifting animals of the sea, many of them the larval forms of bigger life like fish), and all the way through the food web from sea stars to whales.

Each of these processes affects the chemistry of seawater. And the chemistry of seawater determines which way the waters flow--that is, the direction, strength, and depth of oceanic currents. Which in turn affect our climate. I'll write more on that later.

A view into the heated (sweet!) CTD bay as the package is brought in from the ocean Julia Whitty A view into the heated (sweet!) CTD bay as the package is brought in from the ocean Julia Whitty

So the chemistry that Jeremy Mathis' group and others aboard are investigating from each Niskin bottle are the following: methane, oxygen, oxygen/argon isotopes, pH (the relative acidity or alkalinity of the water), carbonate, dissolved organic and inorganic carbon, stable oxygen isotopes, nutrients (think fertilizers), chlorophyll, including HPLC (high-pressure liquid chromatography) that indicates which types of phytoplankton are present, salts, and particles (often from sediments on the bottom).

The scientists collect many individuals "sips" of water from each Niskin bottle, siphoning off one sip for each of the properties listed in the paragraph above. Each sample goes into a separate bottle. Some samples are immediately analyzed in a lab aboard Healy (more on that later). Others will be analyzed ashore.

The action is fast and furious. As soon as all the samples from the CTD have been collected it's prepped to go back down again. The time between launching the CTD, sending it to the bottom, bringing it back up, recovering all its samples, and then prepping it to go down again--where the stations are only 3 miles (5 kilometers) apart--is about one hour. Together, these data will begin to paint a picture of the flow of water off Alaska known as the West Arctic Boundary Current.

Courtesy of Master Chief Tim Sullivan, USCG.Courtesy of Master Chief Tim Sullivan, USCG.

And ultimately, from Jeremy's lab, a picture of how a warming climate is affecting the pH of the Arctic Ocean, as processes that were once frozen and more stable thaw and become enormously dynamic. Jeremy Mathis' research aboard Healy this cruise is supported by the National Science Foundation, Office of Polar Programs.
Source URL: http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2012/10/arctic-ocean-diaries-ctd

Links:
[1] http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/10/bering-sea-diaries-dispatch-1
[2] http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/10/bering-sea-diaries-dispatch-2
[3] http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/10/arctic-ocean-diaries-dispatch-no-3
[4] http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/10/arctic-ocean-diaries-dispatch-no-4
[5] http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2012/10/arctic-ocean-diaries-ctd
 

Roger Garin-michaud (62)
Monday October 15, 2012, 12:31 pm
noted, thanks !
 

Rosie Lopez (73)
Monday October 15, 2012, 1:18 pm
noted thnx
 

Dave C. (214)
Monday October 15, 2012, 1:20 pm
thanks
 

Michael Kirkby (85)
Monday October 15, 2012, 2:20 pm
Yep and our politicians see no harm in giving Shell and others the green light to proceed. Talk about accute myopia and covetous greed.
 

JL A. (275)
Monday October 15, 2012, 2:58 pm
You cannot currently send a star to Michael because you have done so within the last week. You are welcome Roger, Rosie and Dave!
 

Tal H. (8)
Tuesday October 16, 2012, 4:43 pm
I am so sad for the Artic :(
 

Lois Jordan (55)
Tuesday October 16, 2012, 5:56 pm
Noted. Nothing can replace the knowledge that science brings. Great article!
 

JL A. (275)
Tuesday October 16, 2012, 6:14 pm
So true Lois! You cannot currently send a star to Lois because you have done so within the last week.
 

Ruth S. (307)
Wednesday October 17, 2012, 6:19 am
People are the ones that have screwed-up the world!
 

g d c. (0)
Wednesday October 17, 2012, 8:25 am
ty
 

JL A. (275)
Wednesday October 17, 2012, 9:12 am
You're welcome a y m
 

Craig Hemphill (0)
Thursday October 18, 2012, 9:11 pm
there was a north west passage around the turn of the 1900's. I read where two men actually rowed through part of it. Ice is building on the opposite side of the melting area in Antarctica. We are changing our ways, gradually. Economically I cannot see another way to do it and still keep living. Other forms of energy are being developed, until then, there is fossil fuel, period. the problem I see is in the way we dam rivers and make lakes in a desert. Look at China and the Gobi desert. Because China dammed up a large river, a huge lake disappeared; lush greenery, plants, animals, and fish are gone. 40 foot fishing boats sit in a desert! The Gobi claims more desert the size of Rhode Island every year! And China wants us to sign on to stringent environmental controls, with them agreeing to it as well! Balance is the key to survival. We can't change it back over night, by the best estimates I have read, if we stopped all pollution, ie, every fart, fire place, car, factory etc, it would take at least 50 years to know if the climate could be changed back. Personally, after reading over centuries of history, and science, geology, geography, etc, our island earth lives in cycles of warmth and cold. We can influence all that, but not to the extent that some people are talking about. We can change some things, but not everything.
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.