Start A Petition

The End of Cheap Airfare

Business  (tags: abuse, americans, business, consumers, corporate, dishonesty, ethics, finance, investing, investments, investors, lies, marketing, money, politics, society, SustainableDevelopment, usa )

- 1918 days ago -
The US Airways/American merger will mean fewer flights, higher prices, and worse service. But that's OK.

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


JL A (281)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 11:10 am

The End of Cheap Airfare
The US Airways/American merger will mean fewer flights, higher prices, and worse service. But that’s OK.

By Matthew Yglesias|Posted Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2013, at 2:47 PM

Share on Facebook

U.S. Airways planes sit on the tarmac at Charlotte/Douglas International Airport in September 2012 in Charlotte, North Carolina.
The merger between US Airways and American Airlines marks the end of the era of cheap domestic airfares

Photo by Kevork Djansezian/Getty Images

Time to shed a tear into your tiny plastic cups of tomato juice, because the merger between US Airways and American Airlines announced last week marks the end of the era of cheap domestic airfares. Thanks to Northwest’s takeover by Delta, Continental’s takeover by United, and AirTran’s takeover by Southwest, and now this, four giant airlines will soon control about 70 percent of the American market.* That’s not exact a monopoly situation, but it does mean that the 30-plus year run of robust competition and ever-falling airfares is almost certainly over.

American Airlines is a much larger company than US Airways, yet it’s in effect being acquired by the smaller company. That’s because the larger company was bankrupt. The new firm will be owned by a blend of US Airways shareholders and American Airlines creditors, and run primarily by US Airways’ top management. US Airways itself was the product of a similar merger back in 2005. It had filed for bankruptcy in 2002 and then again in 2004, and found itself de facto taken over by the smaller America West Airlines. That merger saw America West’s brand subsumed under the better-known US Airways, but it was America West’s CEO Doug Parker who ran the merged entity and who now, with the American merger, will be CEO of the country’s largest airline.

Parker has moved up in the world because America’s traditional airlines keep collapsing. That, in turn, is the legacy of Jimmy Carter and the airline deregulation of the late-’70s and early-’80s. Fares on interstate routes used to be set by a Civil Aeronautics Board that was thoroughly captured by the entrenched interests of incumbent airlines. The CAB limited competition, and ensured that prices stayed high enough for airlines to be profitable. With profits essentially guaranteed, unions representing airline workers were in a position to bargain for generous compensation and management was able to use the CAB process to pass the costs on to consumers. Meanwhile, in the few instances where a single state was large enough to contain multiple large cities—and thus airlines were intrastate, and not subject to the CAB—fares were quite a bit cheaper. Los Angeles to San Francisco airfares were strikingly lower than fares in the northeast corridor, and Southwest Airlines was pioneering a low-cost model in Texas.

Carter, followed by Ronald Reagan, changed all this and phased out the CAB. Many new airlines launched, incumbents reached out into new markets, Southwest grew into a national carrier, fares fell, total flights taken rose, and everyone started losing money. The once reliably profitable industry has lost somewhere in the neighborhood of $30 billion, with basically all the red ink coming in the past 30 years.

Now most of the startups from the ’80s are out of business. And most of the legacy carriers from the ’70s are also out of business. Shareholders in essentially any airline other than America West or Southwest have likely lost their shirts, and virtually every union has taken it on the chin at least once. A total disaster, in other words, for everyone except customers, who have flown more places, more often, for less money, than they could have imagined in 1976.

But now the party’s over. A key stated goal of this merger—as in the Delta/Northwest and United/Continental deals—is to reduce “excess capacity” in domestic passenger aviation. That’s a polite way of saying less competition and less service. This will take a few forms. There are currently a half dozen US Airways flights from its hub in Philadelphia to Dallas. Dallas is a key American hub, so American also flies six times a day from Philadelphia to Dallas. The combined entity probably won’t need 12 flights a day to serve the route and definitely will have more power to raise prices than either airline would separately. Smaller cities will also see the pinch. Right now, US Airways and American both serve Tallahassee, the former seeking to route passengers through its Charlotte hubs and the latter through its Dallas and Miami hubs. A merged airline might cut that Charlotte service, figuring that network access through Dallas and Miami is ample to compete with Delta’s service through Atlanta. By the same token, when airlines merge the smallest hubs in the new larger airline tend to lose out and shrink.

It is not clear what regulators can or should do about this. A merger that increases industry profits largely by hurting consumers sounds bad. But not only is American Airlines bankrupt, the industry as a whole has been losing money hand over fist. Raising profits from below zero to above it is less insidious than consolidation aimed at increasing the profitability of an already profitable line of business. Travelers have been essentially reaping the benefits of corporate charity and union givebacks as investors poured money into airline startups that ultimately failed. The gravy train couldn’t possibly last forever, and regulators can’t force investors to back doomed aviation startups. This deal is probably bad news for you, and the even worse news is there’s probably no better alternative. Get ready for higher prices and less service.

Correction, Feb. 19, 2013: Due to a copy-editing error, this article originally misspelled the name of AirTran. (Return to the corrected sentence.)

mag.w.d. Aichberger (34)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 1:05 pm
" [S]hort of setting fire to a forest, flying is the single worst thing an ordinary individual can do to cause climate-change. " -- Lisa Guy in "The Age of Stupid" (2009) (imho:) *highly recommendable*

FLYING == (contribution to) MASS MURDER
(and no amount of GreenWashing can help that)

For years now well-known: many more people are injured+killed by pollution from planes (same for cars, of course) than by accidents. And this is killed NOW, NOT taking into account long-term effects (like the imminent Environmental Holocaust)

Roger G (154)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 1:37 pm
noted, thanks !

Past Member (0)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 2:37 pm
There is too much air travel now anyway which must be causing a lot of pollution and contributing to climate change

noted Thanks

Beverly T (82)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 3:44 pm
Too bad we are 50 (FIFTY !) years, an entire generation, behind the world with High Speed Rail.
Pretty sure that if we dug deep enough, we'd find that the Airlines were/are behind that Oversight in the EXTREME !!!
High Speed Rail creates about 1/10 the carbon footprint of airtravel. Saves 20 BILLION pounds over jets.
HSR destroys LESS LAND (about the size of a 2 lane highway) with the equvilant passenger carry of a TEN lane highway.
Etc. etc. etc.

Welcome to America where "In God We Trust" is on our money because MONEY IS OUR GOD !!

Sun c (95)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 3:45 pm
Thanks for sharing!

JL A (281)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 4:41 pm
You are welcome Roger, Carol and Sun Ah.
Excellent facts and observations Frack, Carol and Beverly: thanks ever so much. Unfortunately, that Computer is limiting my stars: You cannot currently send a star to Beverly because you have done so within the last week.
You cannot currently send a star to Carol because you have done so within the last week.

Angelika R (143)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 5:13 pm
You cannot currently send a star to Beverly because you have done so within the last week.************************** star shower to her!

yep, the party's over - the end of cheap everything.

Helen Porter (39)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 5:35 pm
I can't afford to fly.

But, then, there are those who can't afford not to!

JL A (281)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 5:40 pm
You cannot currently send a star to Angelika because you have done so within the last week.
You cannot currently send a star to Zee because you have done so within the last week.

g d c (0)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 7:04 pm

JL A (281)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 7:41 pm
You are welcome a y.

Hartson Doak (39)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 10:05 pm
So. Sounds like this is the time for the high speed rail that has been talked about and talked about and talked about.

JL A (281)
Thursday February 21, 2013, 10:13 pm
On many trips, the discounted airfare was about the same as Amtrak...if airfare goes up alot, even low speed train will be chosen by the cost conscious that have time...and high speed would require less time. You cannot currently send a star to Hartson because you have done so within the last week.

Jaime A (52)
Friday February 22, 2013, 12:19 am
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Business

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.