START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Will Congress Unfriend Mark Zuckerberg?


Business  (tags: dishonesty, corporate, abuse, americans, business, consumers, corruption, ethics, finance, government, investments, politics, society, money, lies, law, marketing, economy, investors, investing, usa, technology )

JL
- 529 days ago - motherjones.com
Facebook and other tech giants are likely to battle against the latest law that would protect your personal data



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

JL A. (275)
Sunday March 17, 2013, 5:53 pm


Mother Jones
Will Congress Unfriend Mark Zuckerberg?
Facebook and other tech giants are likely to battle against the latest law that would protect your personal data.

By Dana Liebelson | Wed Mar. 13, 2013 3:00 AM PDT

Sen. Jay Rockefeller IV (D-W.Va.) plans to retire next year after nearly three decades [1] in public office. But first, he's making a last-ditch effort to protect Americans' privacy in the digital age by reintroducing his "Do-Not-Track Online" Act [2]. The bill would give consumers, as Rockefeller puts it [3], "the opportunity to simply say 'no thank you' to anyone and everyone collecting their online information" and would slap heavy fines on companies that steal your information.

Yet online watchdogs say that so long as privacy policy is dominated by the whims of Silicon Valley and politicians themselves use data tracking to raise campaign cash [4], this effort is a long shot. "While it's good that Sen. Rockefeller reintroduced the bill, everyone recognizes he's a lame duck, and it won't pass," says Jeffrey Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy [5]. "Washington won't pass a privacy bill until John Boehner's bank account is wiped out by hackers and Mark Zuckerberg defriends President Obama."

Lee Tien, senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation [6], agrees, noting that tech companies like Google, Yahoo, and Facebook have been focused on watering down [7] stronger privacy laws in the European Union [8]. "Advertisers and industry are much more engaged on the EU laws, because they are actually moving," Tien says. "The US is a long way from passing a major privacy bill."
"Washington won't pass a privacy bill until John Boehner's bank account is wiped out by hackers and Mark Zuckerberg
defriends President Obama."

Rockefeller, the chair of the Senate commerce committee, first proposed his bill in 2011 [9]. According to the New York Times [10], he did not push this version to the full Senate because companies promised to voluntarily respect users' privacy, in part by following standards set by the World Wide Web Consortium [11]. The voluntary plan "has failed pretty miserably," says Kevin McAlister, a spokesman for Rockefeller.

"Do Not Track" would require companies to honor a consumer's decision not to be monitored as he or she navigates through cyberspace, including on mobile phones, and gives the Federal Trade Commission the authority to issue fines of up to $15 million [12]. The bill takes aim at companies like Acxiom and Experian [13] that stalk your every online move and sell that information to companies like Facebook, so they can better target their advertisements. As ProPublica [14]'s Lois Beckett explains, data brokers sell information about everything from "whether you're pregnant or divorced or trying to lose weight." If you just read 18 wedding announcements on the New York Times site, for example, Facebook knows that—but you might not know that until the engagement ring advertisements start popping up on your Facebook profile page. Do Not Track would hypothetically block involuntary data sharing like that. But if you change your Facebook relationship status to "engaged," this bill can't help you—that's voluntary information-sharing.

Chris Calabrese, legislative counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, told IDG News Service [15], "If consumers don't have the ability to opt out, the result is going to be a detailed portrait of our online activities, and that portrait will be outside our control." Aleecia McDonald, director of privacy for the Stanford Center for Internet and Society, agrees that "Coming to a common understanding of ways to put users in control of their online experience through Do Not Track would be better for all stakeholders." (Companies who run the web browsers, like Mozilla [16] and Apple [16], tend to side with the privacy advocates.)

Although Google, Yahoo, and Facebook have yet to publicly weigh in on Rockefeller's bill, when a similar "Do Not Track" bill [17] was introduced in California by Democratic State Sen. Alan Lowenthal in 2011, these companies and dozens of others signed on to a letter [18] calling the bill "unnecessary, unenforceable and unconstitutional."

Daniel Castro, a senior analyst for the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation [19] who opposes the bill, says that "receiving targeted ads is how consumers pay for free access to content and services," and consumers should simply "not use services that they think don't respect their privacy." In other words, if you don't want to be watched, don't go to sites that watch you.

There's one final obstacle for Rockefeller: His fellow lawmakers are already using online data tracking to collect information about their constituents. "We just came out of a campaign season that saw a huge emphasis on the use of targeted advertising to reach voters," says Castro. "I suspect this legislation would gather much more support if it carved out exemptions for tracking for political campaigns." Chester notes, "President Obama is using the same techniques that the data brokers and others are being accused of…How can we expect Washington to protect consumers, when invading privacy is good for electoral prospects?" That's a question that Rockefeller doesn't have to worry about.
Source URL: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/rockefeller-do-not-track-act-facebook

Links:
[1] http://bigstory.ap.org/article/apnewsbreak-rockefeller-wont-seek-re-election
[2] http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/418/committees
[3] http://www.rockefeller.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=deb2f396-104e-46a0-b206-8c3d47e2eed3
[4] http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/10/obama-campaign-microtargeting-technology
[5] http://www.democraticmedia.org/
[6] https://www.eff.org/
[7] http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/dbf20262-8685-11e2-b907-00144feabdc0.html#axzz2NKnYSXWi
[8] http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/03/google-facebook-sopa-privacy
[9] http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-tech/post/sen-rockefeller-introduces-do-not-track-bill-for-internet/2011/05/09/AF0ymjaG_blog.html
[10] http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/28/senator-seeks-more-data-rights-for-online-consumers/
[11] http://www.w3.org/
[12] http://op.bna.com/der.nsf/id/sbay-95d25a/$File/aa022813.pdf
[13] http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/27/business/ftc-seeks-privacy-legislation.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
[14] http://www.motherjones.com/media/2013/03/data-brokers-selling-personal-information
[15] http://www.macworld.com/article/1159775/donottrack.html
[16] http://www.theverge.com/2013/2/23/4023078/firefox-to-start-blocking-cookies-from-third-party-advertisers
[17] http://leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_0751-0800/sb_761_bill_20110425_amended_sen_v96.pdf
[18] http://cdn.arstechnica.net/oppositionletter.pdf
[19] http://www.itif.org/content/mission
 

Kit B. (276)
Sunday March 17, 2013, 6:18 pm

It really may be our last chance for a bill like this. As the Internet has taken over so much of our lives, there seems to be no one that is willing to stand up for the users to just say no. We think of privacy as a basic human right, but think again. They do track you, and they do sell your information to advertisers. Though even these techie guys can make mistakes - unless I was in Poland recently and just slept through that trip. There it is on Facebook.
 

Angelika R. (146)
Sunday March 17, 2013, 6:39 pm
Guess the answer is in the article- looks like little to no hope for privacy.
"Washington won't pass a privacy bill until John Boehner's bank account is wiped out by hackers and Mark Zuckerberg defriends President Obama." Thx
 

JL A. (275)
Sunday March 17, 2013, 6:57 pm
I'm glad you got your trip to Poland Kit. You are welcome Angelika.
You cannot currently send a star to Kit because you have done so within the last day.
You cannot currently send a star to Angelika because you have done so within the last day.
 

Autumn S. (146)
Sunday March 17, 2013, 7:01 pm
Sadly, privacy on the internet looks like it won't happen. Yes, unfriend Mark Zuckerberg. I deleted my Facebook a year or so ago, I didn't like how they sold info. and they do. It's all very disgusting.
 

Laura H. (880)
Sunday March 17, 2013, 7:40 pm
I hate facebook; no rights, no privacy, no imagination...

Plus Zuckerberg scares the HELL out of me; he kills animals with his own two hands and ENJOYS it-oh but it is for his 'food;...yikes...
sicko freak.

Why can't someone with his money and power be an animal rights/welfare activist? Oh, if I had that kind of money-the GREAT things I would be doing...
 

JL A. (275)
Sunday March 17, 2013, 7:54 pm
You cannot currently send a star to Autumn because you have done so within the last day.
 

Siti R. (12)
Monday March 18, 2013, 3:15 am
just before he leaves office?
 

Laura P. (24)
Monday March 18, 2013, 8:03 am
thanks
 

JL A. (275)
Monday March 18, 2013, 8:17 am
He is freer then Siti since he doesn't need campaign contributors and supporters.
You are welcome Laura
 

Micheael Kirkbym (85)
Monday March 18, 2013, 9:53 am
Bell Canada and a few others have been doing that for years. Where do you think all that junk mail originates from? They sell your information to marketing companies. Then of course with the internet it becomes another assault on controlling what we think and what we do and purchase.
 

Carol D. (109)
Monday March 18, 2013, 11:31 am
I think in time we will lose any privacy we have with the internet Dont have much now


noted
 

Stephen Brian (23)
Monday March 18, 2013, 12:08 pm
I had seven companies try to track me on this page, but I got a browser plug-in called "Do Not Track Me", and now they don't.
 

Kathy B. (98)
Monday March 18, 2013, 12:29 pm
I dislike Facebook, Google & Amazon for this very reason and avoid them whenever possible.
 

Donna G. (38)
Monday March 18, 2013, 12:58 pm
I also have the Do Not Track browser plug-in. My all time total for companies being blocked is over 200,000. Most of the time it is Google plus, Facebook, and Twitter. The only Google product that I use is Google Earth. I've never had a Twitter account and got rid of my Facebook account a long time ago. Funny thing is that when I deleted my Facebook account, the Facebook spam also stopped.
 

Ann Breeden (65)
Monday March 18, 2013, 3:34 pm
It sounds like a great bill but as long as the government is using it for electoral reasons I don't hold up too much hope in it passing.
 

JL A. (275)
Monday March 18, 2013, 3:51 pm
You cannot currently send a star to Michael because you have done so within the last day.
You cannot currently send a star to Carol because you have done so within the last day.
 

Dianna M. (13)
Monday March 18, 2013, 5:22 pm
"Washington won't pass a privacy bill until John Boehner's bank account is wiped out by hackers and Mark Zuckerberg defriends President Obama." HELLO! "ANONYMOUS"? I BELIEVE THAT WAS A HINT!
 

Marcel Elschot (137)
Wednesday March 20, 2013, 11:14 am
thanks noted
 

JL A. (275)
Wednesday March 20, 2013, 4:08 pm
LOL Dianna.
You are welcome Marcel
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.