START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denies Mayor Nutter's Request to Impose Contract Terms


Business  (tags: usa, politics, government, GoodNews, ethics, economy, dishonesty, corruption, americans, abuse, goodnews, law, labor )

JL
- 450 days ago - afscme.org
Back in February, Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter went full Scott Walker when he tried to take away city employees' collective bargaining rights by asking the state Supreme Court to impose his terms of a contract.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

JL A. (275)
Friday June 21, 2013, 3:12 pm
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Denies Mayor Nutter’s Request to Impose Contract Terms

by Pablo Ros | June 11, 2013

Back in February, Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter went full Scott Walker when he tried to take away city employees’ collective bargaining rights by asking the state Supreme Court to impose his terms of a contract.

It was a dirty trick borrowed from the playbook of Wisconsin’s anti-worker governor, but one that has come to be expected from Philadelphia’s Mayor 1 Percent.

But last week, the highest court in Pennsylvania blocked Nutter’s plan. By an overwhelming majority, the judges denied Nutter’s request to fast-track his case, which would let him impose contract terms on blue-collar city employees who are members of AFSCME District Council 33.

“Mayor Nutter’s attempt to overturn more than 40 years of collective bargaining rights was turned down,” said DC 33 Pres. Pete Matthews. “Now return to the bargaining table and get a fair contract with city workers.”

This is a victory for all public employees in Pennsylvania, whose collective bargaining rights have been reaffirmed. It means public employees have a voice at the table and the right to decide on the terms of their contracts, and that right cannot be arbitrarily taken away.

It’s now up to Mayor Nutter to sit down at the table with city employees and bargain in good faith. If he wishes to learn anything from this experience, it should be that pursuing the case through the courts will get him nowhere – he needs to go back to the bargaining table.
 

Kit B. (276)
Friday June 21, 2013, 4:51 pm

Sometimes the little guy wins. This is one of those times.
 

JL A. (275)
Friday June 21, 2013, 4:55 pm
You cannot currently send a star to Kit because you have done so within the last day.
 

Past Member (0)
Saturday June 22, 2013, 5:12 am
Noted
 

Elizabeth Pugliese (8)
Saturday June 22, 2013, 7:09 am
Yeah all those raises city workers keep getting in collective bargaining are why your taxes keep going up. Essential services are being cut to pay for these raises.
 

JL A. (275)
Saturday June 22, 2013, 7:21 am
Actually not true Elizabeth--far more goes to increased procurement costs and contractors' costs than are given in collective bargaining agreements if one actually studies budgets and the issue for factual determinations.
 

Birgit W. (144)
Saturday June 22, 2013, 12:48 pm
Noted.
 

Joanne Dixon (38)
Saturday June 22, 2013, 2:42 pm
Any city employee whose raise affects essential services is not getting that raise from collective bargaining, because he or she is upper management, probably the mayor. Even in a small government unit like a city, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer.
 

Debra Tate (17)
Saturday June 22, 2013, 2:44 pm
Noted! Thank you Supreme court! Our rights were not stepped on!
 

june t. (65)
Saturday June 22, 2013, 11:55 pm
Noted.
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.