START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

Let's Keep Fighting to Pass the Paycheck Fairness Act!


Business  (tags: wages, women, Paycheck Fairness Act, petitions )

Freya
- 416 days ago - thehungersite.greatergood.com
Even after the most recent April 2013 denial of the Paycheck Fairness Act, following two previous rejections, Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) is not backing down for the bill that would help ensure women are paid the same as their male counterparts.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

AniMae Chi (411)
Wednesday August 28, 2013, 4:45 pm
Thank You for Signing!
Goal: 15,000 • Progress: 6,996
 

Rose NoFWDSPLZ (276)
Wednesday August 28, 2013, 6:03 pm
Thank You for Signing!
 

Sue H. (7)
Wednesday August 28, 2013, 8:04 pm
Noted and absolutely signed, thanks.
 

Natasha Salgado (537)
Wednesday August 28, 2013, 9:45 pm
Signed-thx Freya
 

Elizabeth O. (88)
Thursday August 29, 2013, 7:17 am
Signed.
 

Carole K. (199)
Thursday August 29, 2013, 6:02 pm
Noted & signed. TY, Freya! Let's win this battle in the on-going War on Women!
 

Gloria picchetti (296)
Friday August 30, 2013, 6:57 am
Thank you, you've already signed this campaign!
 

. (0)
Friday August 30, 2013, 7:27 am
Signed and noted. Thanks for sharing, Freya.
 

Phil P. (92)
Friday August 30, 2013, 12:54 pm
Signed w/ pleasure.
 

Alice C. (1797)
Friday August 30, 2013, 1:48 pm
Signed with comment.
 

Alice C. (1797)
Friday August 30, 2013, 2:21 pm
Shared with friends and family
 

Lois Jordan (56)
Friday August 30, 2013, 2:33 pm
Signed & noted. Thanks, Freya.
 

Birgit W. (147)
Friday August 30, 2013, 3:06 pm
Signed, thanks.
 

Winn Adams (192)
Friday August 30, 2013, 3:57 pm
Signed
 

Dianna M. (15)
Friday August 30, 2013, 3:58 pm
Let’s see: Adrian Smith says, “[This] could complicate the enforcement of anti-discrimination laws, place undue burdens on employers by forcing them to prove differences in pay are not gender-related, and encourage unlimited punitive damages for factors unrelated to gender.” Why do I get the feeling that the so-called “undue burden” is what he’s most concerned with?

Mike Johanns says, “It would expand the government’s reach by establishing unprecedented annual compensation reporting requirements for businesses. It could also restrict the ability of employees to negotiate higher salaries with their employers and prevent employers from offering merit-based bonuses.” Let’s see, the last time I got a “merit-based bonus” was . . . well, never. Negotiate a higher salary? Not bloody likely, for factory workers like me. He goes on to say something about a potential “flood of costly lawsuits.” Wait—isn’t that basically the same thing as “placing undue burdens on employers”?

Deb Fischer hasn’t weighed in on this topic yet. When (and if) she does, though, I really don’t expect anything different: In an email on the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, she says, “. . . it is important to strike a balance between guaranteeing the protection of pregnant workers under current laws while ensuring that businesses are not overburdened by unnecessary regulations." I'm sensing a theme here.
 

Diana Bair (7)
Friday August 30, 2013, 8:20 pm
SIGNED....KEEP UP THE FIGHT!!!!!!!!.
 

Melania Padilla (179)
Saturday August 31, 2013, 5:59 pm
Thank you, you've already signed this campaign!
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.