Start A Petition

What Is the Actual Status of Carbon Capture Technology?

Science & Tech  (tags: environment, CCS, Carbon capture and storage, science, research, technology, CO2 emissions, coal, fossill fuels, concept, investigation, NewTechnology )

- 1678 days ago -
The EPA's long-expected rules for carbon emissions from new coal-fired power plants have thrown into sharp relief the question of whether carbon capture and sequestration or storage (CC&S) can be described as "demonstrated" and ready for commercialization

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Michael O (176)
Sunday October 13, 2013, 1:55 pm
By Bill Sweet

This is because the new regulations declare, in effect, that no new coal plant can be built without CC&S.

The EPA is reported to have alluded to four CC&S plants and projects in connection with its coal regs—in California, Mississippi, Texas, and Saskatchewan, Canada—though I cannot find that statement in the press release, technical backgrounders or detailed report on regulatory impacts issued with the new coal regs on 20 Sept. But surely the most substantial and furthest along of the U.S. projects is the IGCC plant that Southern Company is building in Kemper, Mississippi [photo].

Integrated gasification combined-cycle technology involves coal gasification and then the separation of carbon dioxide from other flue gases, including those containing nitrogen. Can Kemper be considered a demonstration of a technology ready for commercialization? By no stretch of the imagination. The plant is being built with a $270 million contribution from the U.S. Department of Energy. And Southern Company has issued a statement saying the Kemper technology "cannot be consistently replicated on a national scale."

DOE originally hoped to see IGCC tested and demonstrated at a plant to be built near Tampa, Florida, but the local utility lost interest. The Energy Department thereupon helped get the demonstration transferred to Mississippi. The government subsequently changed horses mid-race. FutureGen, which was to have sponsored the major U.S. demonstration of IGCC, collapsed toward the end of George W. Bush's presidency. The Obama administration decided early on to resuscitate the project, but switched to an alternative technology known as oxycombustion or oxyfiring. (In oxyfiring, nitrogen is removed from air pre-combustion, which simplifies separation of carbon dioxide post-combustion.) The change suggested that IGCC was suffering some loss of confidence at Obama's DOE as well.

Outside North America, the important work being done on CC&S is also pre-commercial. Norway and its national oil company, Statoil, having declared in the past that depleted North Sea oil fields contain enough storage capacity to sequester all the carbon dioxide emitted from European power plants, have a major R&D facility at Mongstad. On 23 Sept., however, the government and Statoil, while reaffirming their commitment to research there, pulled the plug on upgrading Mongstad to commercial-scale.

Sweden's national utility Vattenfall has been testing oxycombustion technology at a power plant it owns in eastern Germany, at Schwarze Pumpe. As described in an MIT summary, "Vattenfall announced in November 2009 that it was achieving nearly 100 percent CO2 capture at Schwarze Pumpe. As of the beginning of June 2010, Schwarze Pumpe has now been in operation over 6500 hours during the last one and a half years… Vattenfall is continuously rebuilding and developing this unit." Vattenfall plans to continue operations for ten years.

All that is well and good, but of course it does not add up to having a demonstrated technology ready for commercial deployment. Five years ago, Spectrum declared Schwarze Pumpe a "winner," not because it necessarily would lead to a usable technology, but because Vattenfall at least was trying seriously to find one.

David C (25)
Sunday October 13, 2013, 11:32 pm
" The head physician of an asylum for the mentally challenged used the following test to assess the mental state of new patients: He would take them into a bathroom with a bath-tub full to the brim. Then he would turn on all the faucets to full, give the patient a bucket and tell hir to empty the tub...
From the patients behavior, esp. if sHe turned off the taps (and when) or not before working with the bucket, he usually got quite a good idea about their state. "
( paraphrased from memory & translated from German; source=??

Azmi Timur (0)
Monday October 14, 2013, 2:58 pm
Noted thx.

Heidi Aubrey (5)
Monday October 14, 2013, 6:35 pm
What is the point of sequestering and storing CO2? At the very, very best its nothing but a very temporary fix.

Kerrie G (116)
Tuesday October 15, 2013, 7:50 am
Noted, thanks.

Roger G (154)
Thursday October 17, 2013, 1:01 am
noted, thanks

Bob hardly here P (394)
Thursday October 17, 2013, 7:20 am
Thanks Michael

Sergio Padilla (65)
Monday October 28, 2013, 11:28 am
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Science & Tech

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.