Start A Petition

Windmills Are Things of Beauty

Green Lifestyle  (tags: CO2emissions, eco-friendly, green, greenproducts, greenliving, environment, wind, wind power, windmills, wind energy, wind turbines, sustainable, Sustainabililty )

- 1504 days ago -
Some people think wind turbines are ugly. I think smokestacks, smog, acid rain, coal-fired power plants and climate change are ugly. I think windmills are beautiful.

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


Michael O (176)
Sunday April 6, 2014, 3:00 pm
By David Suzuki

I have a cabin on Quadra Island off the British Columbia coast that's as close to my heart as you can imagine. From my porch you can see clear across the waters of Georgia Strait to the snowy peaks of the rugged Coast Mountains. It's one of the most beautiful views I have seen. And I would gladly share it with a wind farm.

Sometimes it seems I'm in the minority. Across Europe and North America, environmentalists and others are locking horns with the wind industry over farm locations. In Canada, opposition to wind installations has sprung up from Nova Scotia to Ontario to Alberta to B.C. In the U.K., more than 100 national and local groups, led by some of the country's most prominent environmentalists, have argued wind power is inefficient, destroys the ambience of the countryside and makes little difference to carbon emissions. And in the U.S., the Cape Wind Project, which would site 130 turbines off the coast of affluent Cape Cod, Massachusetts, has come under fire from famous liberals, including John Kerry and the late Sen. Edward Kennedy.

It's time for some perspective. With the growing urgency of climate change, we can't have it both ways. We can't shout about the dangers of global warming and then turn around and shout even louder about the "dangers" of windmills. Climate change is one of the greatest challenges humanity will face this century. Confronting it will take a radical change in the way we produce and consume energy another industrial revolution, this time for clean energy, conservation and efficiency.

We've undergone such transformations before and we can again. But we must accept that all forms of energy have associated costs. Fossil fuels are limited in quantity, create vast amounts of pollution and contribute to climate change. Large-scale hydroelectric power floods valleys and destroys habitat. Nuclear power plants are expensive, create radioactive waste and take a long time to build.

Wind power also has its downsides. It's highly visible and can kill birds. But any man-made structure (not to mention cars and house cats) can kill birds houses, radio towers, skyscrapers. In Toronto alone, an estimated one million birds collide with the city's buildings every year. In comparison, the risk to birds from well-sited wind farms is low. Even the U.K.'s Royal Society for the Protection of Birds says scientific evidence shows wind farms "have negligible impacts" on birds when they are appropriately located.

Improved technologies and more attention to wind farm placement can clearly reduce harm to birds, bats and other wildlife. Indeed, the real risk to flying creatures comes not from windmills but from a changing climate, which threatens the very existence of species and their habitats. Wind farms should always be subject to environmental-impact assessments, but a blanket "not in my backyard" approach is hypocritical and counterproductive.

Pursuing wind power as part of our move toward clean energy makes sense. Wind power has become the fastest-growing source of energy in the world, employing hundreds of thousands of workers. That's in part because larger turbines and greater knowledge of how to build, install and operate them has dramatically reduced costs over the past two decades. Prices are now comparable to other forms of power generation and will likely decrease further as technology improves.

But, are windmills ugly? Mostafa Tolba, executive director of the UN Environment Programme from 1976 to 1992, told me belching smokestacks were considered signs of progress when he was growing up in Egypt. Even as an adult concerned about pollution, it took him a long time to get over the pride he felt when he saw a tower pouring clouds of smoke.

Our perception of beauty is shaped by our values and beliefs. Some people think wind turbines are ugly. I think smokestacks, smog, acid rain, coal-fired power plants and climate change are ugly. I think windmills are beautiful. They harness the wind's power to supply us with heat and light. They provide local jobs. They help clean air and reduce climate change.

And if one day I look out from my cabin porch and see a row of windmills spinning in the distance, I won't curse them. I will praise them. It will mean we're finally getting somewhere.

David F (14)
Sunday April 6, 2014, 4:04 pm
> I think windmills are beautiful.
- and i think this woudl depend A LOT on whether we're talking windmills to supply a village with flour or wind-parks to supply a city with (some of) its electricity (or even power) consumption

Past Member (0)
Sunday April 6, 2014, 5:23 pm
Not sure i'd call them beautiful--some are an eyesore...but i'll take windmills over smokestacks anyday. I'd love to see these wind giants be improved/modified to protect our precious dwindling bird #'s+soon. Thx Michael

Past Member (0)
Monday April 7, 2014, 2:02 am
I totally agree with you. Especially when they are painted :)

Past Member (0)
Monday April 7, 2014, 2:49 am
I quite like windmills. Always have. But really, does it matter if they're attractive or not? Have we humans become so shallow that we now want 'pretty windmills'??? Please! It's about helping the planet- the environment- not aesthetics!!!

Mari 's (1356)
Monday April 7, 2014, 3:20 am
Yes they are and for Gaia too!

Past Member (0)
Monday April 7, 2014, 6:22 am
The beauty is founded by benefiting all the living lives

Sheila D (194)
Monday April 7, 2014, 9:23 am
Have always been fascinated with windmills and can see no reason why so many don't like them, expecially the newer bladeless turbines. These turbines should cause less damage to bats and birds while still producing green energy. Thank you.

Hartson Doak (39)
Monday April 7, 2014, 10:54 am
I saw a wind mill that looked like a weather vane with the blades forming an arc from nose to tail. I couldn't keep my eyes off it.

Terry H (15)
Monday April 7, 2014, 11:06 am
To put things into perspective... Figures from the UK estimate that windfarms kill some 7000 birds per year, domestic and feral cats account for some 55 million per year. Yes you did read that right.

Lindsay K (6)
Monday April 7, 2014, 12:01 pm
I totally agree, too.

Nimue Michelle Pendragon Gaze (339)
Tuesday April 8, 2014, 8:26 pm

Danuta W (1249)
Thursday April 10, 2014, 6:18 am

Ben O (171)
Friday April 11, 2014, 11:38 am
I agree...-Let the 4 winds blow!

Ben O (171)
Friday April 11, 2014, 11:41 am
One more thing; A nuclear plant is indeed UGLY!

Past Member (0)
Saturday April 12, 2014, 11:04 pm
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Green Lifestyle

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.