START A PETITION37,000,000 members: the world's largest community for good

New Mexico Supreme Court Rules Against Photographer Who Refused Gay Couple


US Politics & Gov't  (tags: New Mexico Supreme Court, Human Rights Act, gay rights, ethics, freedoms, constitution, news, government, goodnews )

Carrie
- 1202 days ago - ontopmag.com
The New Mexico Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously ruled against a photographer who had refused to photograph a lesbian couple's commitment ceremony in 2006.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Kit B (276)
Friday August 23, 2013, 1:36 pm

Good news from New Mexico.
 

GGmaSheila D (205)
Friday August 23, 2013, 2:35 pm
Of course photographer's going to appeal...again, what's behind the delaying tactic?? Clog up the courts??
 

Animae C (517)
Friday August 23, 2013, 4:08 pm
Well done.
 

Birgit W (159)
Friday August 23, 2013, 6:09 pm
Thanks.
 

CeAnne Ryding-Becker (10)
Saturday August 24, 2013, 1:10 am
It will be a beautiful day when us in the LGBT community are no longer discriminated against and no longer need to sue for equal rights.
 

Lindsey O (19)
Saturday August 24, 2013, 7:24 am
The decision was based on the law. And the photographer broke the law. Elane Photography is a legally-registered corporation in New Mexico (it's a LLC according to NM Secretary of State records). And a corporation is a separate thing from its incorporators. It has no religious beliefs to affront. This corporation was providing services to the public and New Mexico has a law which says those services cannot be limited to those of a specific sexual orientation.

Don't want to give up your right to object to things on religious grounds? Then don't incorporate. Because incorporation gives many legal benefits - and many legal restrictions.
 

Esther Z (94)
Saturday August 24, 2013, 10:35 am
It's simply that these people don't see it as a civil rights issue; they figured it's OK to discriminate to a LGBTQ couple, but probably wouldn't think of (maybe) doing the same to an interracial couple. Personally, if the photographer didn't want to take my wedding or civil union pictures, I wouldn't want them there; they might take lousy pictures just out of hate or spitefulness. Besides, who wants all that negative energy during one of the most important day of a person's life? Not me!
 

Elizabeth M (65)
Saturday August 24, 2013, 12:29 pm
Great news out of New Mexico.
Noted with thanks Carrie.
 

Mari 's (1356)
Sunday August 25, 2013, 3:32 am
Great news and we need so much more of it.
 

Robert K (31)
Sunday August 25, 2013, 4:28 am
CeAnne, I may not be a part of your community, but I'm 100% in agreement with you. How is it that so many don't understand that equal rights means equal rights for EVERYONE or it means nothing at all?
 

. (0)
Monday August 26, 2013, 10:13 am
I find this interesting as well. In a free emterprise system, a private company (not a chain, which has to follow corporate policy), does not have the right to refuse a person's business?
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)


Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in US Politics & Gov't





 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.