Start A Petition

Banksters Attack Syria to Enslave America

Business  (tags: U.S., Obama, Syria, attack on Syria, who's attacking whom?, why?, bankers, control of world economy, John Perkins, subversion, big banking families, derivatives, media, student loans )

- 1755 days ago -
The war on Syria is not an American war on Syria, an Israeli war on Syria, an al-Qaeda war on Syria, a Qatari war on Syria, a Turkish war on Syria, or a Saudi war on Syria. It is a bankers' war on Syria."

Select names from your address book   |   Help

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.


JL A (281)
Monday September 2, 2013, 9:17 pm
Interesting perspective rarely seen in print--thanks Judy.

David C (25)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 3:23 am
... and the banksters' war on Syria is only one battle in their (the "0.[00]1%'s eco- omni- and sui-cidal maniacs) global war on the rest of humankind (the "99(+)%") and --to sum it up in short-- the rest of "creation" (esp. Nature, Eaarth, ...)
" Nothing is more profitable for international banksters than war. " -- Zeitgeist (2007), which statement is well supported by history:

" New York Stock exchange had a boom yesterday following Von Ribbentrop[=Hitler's foreign minister]'s speech at Danzig. Wall Street interprets the speech as meaning a long war. Stocks rose almost to the highest levels of the year. " -- the Daily Sketch of October 26, 1939; quoted by Derrick Jensen in "A Language Older than Words" (NY.2000)

Elizabeth M (65)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 10:25 am
Very interesting, I had never thought of it that way. Always knew that during war time country's make money,
I think I read an article awhile ago about the Banksters' wanting to take control.
Have bookmarked this so I can read again. Thanks Judy.

Jane K (10)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 11:46 am
I am not a fan of bankers in any way and yes, they profit from war but the more I looked into this allegation the more crazy stuff I found. It seems to me that this is a paranoids dream of how things really are. Don't we have enough trouble without buying into the craziness ? And about the David Rockefeller quote ,"Skepticism is in order for the accuracy or attribution of alleged remarks from these exclusive meetings, particularly those which could be manifestations of either satire, sarcasm or outright fraudulence." See Wikileaks

Roger G (154)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 1:26 pm
noted, thanks

Lois Jordan (63)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 4:22 pm
Noted. Thanks so much for posting, Judy. It makes complete sense to me. Have we forgotten the wise old words of those "in the know"?: "Always follow the money." And, will add that I am 100% against U.S. military action against Syria. This is a great opportunity for Congress to turn down Obama's request, plus finally remove the AUMF (Authorization For the Use of Military Force) that allowed Bush, now Obama to do as they please---without any support from the (taxpaying) citizens of America.

Past Member (0)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 5:14 pm
Very good article, but i'm not so sure Putin isn't also part of the problem.

Judy C (97)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 6:34 pm
Good point, Robert.Thanks to all for the comments, everyone.

I, too look for the money, and who profits, Lois. That's always the bottom line, as much as we might wish higher principles were motivating our country's behavior. Remember the Military-Industrial Complex. Peace would just about put these corporations out of business. Massive sums of money are spent just for posturing, even if no attack occurs.

I'm glad to see this in print, too, J.L. We are fed such a pack of lies by the corporate-owned media.

Elizabeth, when I first studied these issues, it made me think, this can't really be what's going on, can it? The Bankers have a death grip on the world economy, and our our country's old safeguards of regulation enacted to prevent another Great Depression have been systematically dismantled, starting with the Reagan Administration. The Bankers and corporations buy both Democrats and Republicans, so our political system is becoming a sham. The media are cashing in, as the expanding pomp and B.S. keeps the propaganda machine running.

David, I noticed the stock exchange, and it's not surprising. Wall Street and The Bankers are cashing in, no doubt.

Back when the financial meltdown occurred in 2008, I'll never forget George Bush and Goldman veteran, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, in full Chicken Little mode talking to the American People about the impending implosion. Our only hope, it seems, was to infuse the banks with massive sums of taxpayers' money. They looked panicky, and no doubt were, as they presented this crisis to Congress. After all, they were pulling off the Scam of the Century. Congress bought the story, (as if they didn't know what time it was). After that, Bush and Paulson reappeared on the news, grinning like Cheshire Cats. Bush was restored to his usual smirking self. It was sickening.

Jane, I am in favor of skepticism too, and I'm not usually into conspiracy theories. The elite, though, are hardly transparent in their plans. Their actions reveal that the People and the Planet are expendable to them. People such as the Rockefellers are so used to power and privilege that they couldn't begin to comprehend the life of an ordinary person. David Rockefeller's quote (from the article) does nothing to enhance his credibility or appeal.Here it is:

"David Rockefeller spoke the truth at the 1991 Bilderberg meeting in Baden, Germany: "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

WHATEVER! We must carefully connect the dots, because most of the media is not operating on our behalf.

Robert O (12)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 8:03 pm
As if we needed more enslavement and strife. Worrisome to say the least. Thanks Judy!

Jane K (10)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 8:13 pm
That's just it Judy---David Rockefeller probably didn't even say that stuff you keep quoting. It was just posted on hearsay, by whom? And for what purpose ? To rile people up. As the article I found said those "quotes " supposedly spoken by David Rockefeller "could be manifestations of either satire, sarcasm or outright fraudulence."
That is not proof of anything. David Rockefeller may not have said a thing.

Beth S (330)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 8:44 pm

Shame on using this as a source. Why not just use the Nazi Party publications?

reft h (66)
Tuesday September 3, 2013, 11:44 pm
food for thought

Jonathan Harper (0)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 4:32 am

Sheryl G (360)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 8:31 am
David Rockerfeller in his own words in his own Memoirs, you can purchase the book, on page 405 actually stated the following:

"Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure---one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.".

The other statement:

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."

Was claimed to be said at the Bilderberg/Trilateral meeting in 1991 in Baden Baden, Germany and reported by
Bill Clinton in attendance. If his word isn't anything one wants to hang any truth upon, the statement was also reported in the Hilaire duBerrier Report and other French publications.

I therefore do not see much difference in the more common statement that was used in this article than the statement he put in his actual memoirs.

Thank you Judy for always finding interesting reading. One must always take time to read many articles and to take in many perspectives. It is only through having knowledge from many places and many sources will we in all of it discover the truth. Otherwise only reading from a narrow list of publications leads one to only knowing part of the truth at best or worse total propaganda and indoctrination.

Mitchell D (87)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 12:06 pm
Sounds like a bit much, to me, but, on the other hand, it may just be possible, as the Plutocrats want nothing but everything.

Sara V (0)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 4:00 pm
Thank you, Judy. The truth, though ugly, is the key to our freedom.

Judy C (97)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 4:08 pm
Jane, i have enough background in research to know how to determine whether or not a source is legitimate. Rockefeller's own memoir represents his views.


Sara V (0)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 4:11 pm
"The Bankers have a death grip on the world economy, and our our country's old safeguards of regulation enacted to prevent another Great Depression have been systematically dismantled, starting with the Reagan Administration." Judy, considering that we HAD a Great Depression - the safeguards were dismantled before that. The stock markets were manipulated and the big players pulled their money out and left the little people holding the bag. (Isn't that always what happens with such manipulation?)

I would consider the Federal Reserve Act (passed by a handful of Congress members while most were away for the holidays) of 1913 as the root of many of our problems. Since the U.S. is not even issuing its own currency, but borrowing it from the banks (Federal Reserve) at a debt load, we start out behind the 8 ball. (While they profit, yet again.) That and fractional reserve lending. Just think - if we all were allowed to legally lend nine times the amount we actually have (like the banks - has anyone else noticed that they don't even bother having vaults or high counter walls anymore? The capital is not real!), I'm sure we could make millions of dollars on interest payments and by foreclosing on the property of our borrowers as well. Those bankers have a really sweet deal going. We need to put an end to it.

elderberry C (47)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 4:15 pm
In that case Rothschild is included as top dog.....Tx

Judy C (97)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 4:37 pm
Beth, I accept an Iranian source as a representation of their viewpoint and history. They are a Theocracy, but not everyone in Iran is thinking in perfect lockstep. Islam is not the problem, nor is Judaism per se. The problem is repression and domination of any group by another. It becomes more reprehensible when religion or condemnation of a religion is used to justify belligerent actions. Part of being an intelligent reader of news is to look at a variety of resources, keeping an open mind and as balanced a perspective as possible. Dandelion expresses this idea well above. In the end, the actions of any group really reveals their intentions more than anything.

Thanks for your comments, everyone.

Judy C (97)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 5:24 pm
Sara, I'm definitely no fan of the Federal Reserve. Did it appear that I was saying that there were regulations in place before the Great Depression? I intended to say that regulation was imposed after the Great Depression, most notably Glass Steagall, so that it wouldn't happen again. Reagan began a trend of "Getting the government off our backs" as he put it. The culmination of that was the repeal of Glass-Steagall under Clinton.

Thanks for the explanation about the Federal Reserve, Sara. So many people have no idea of what it is and how it functions. It is the root of many evils. For some icing on the cake, Bernanke's "quantitative easing", in my opinion, is really irresponsible, and will bite us in the backside in the future.

Sara V (0)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 8:46 pm
I agree that what has happened since the repeal of Glass Steagall has been awful. The bankers must have been throwing a real party when it was repealed because that opened up yet another floodgate for them. What I was getting at is that no amount of regulation or oversight will help when a system is fundamentally flawed.

We should get the government off our backs because it is what is enabling this plundering of decent hard-working people. The natural checks and balances on the banking system are gone. Number one, bank runs are now illegal (and in addition, we bail out the banks if they lend more money than they have). Number two, fractional reserve lending as I mentioned above (banks legally lending nine times more than their assets) Number three, we are forced to use the currency they control and devalue. We are locked into a system which benefits only the elite, who pull the strings. Expecting them to help us or "go after the bad guys" is folly. They are the ones doing this to us.

You might be interested in Bill Moyer's recent interview with Mark Leibovich, author of This Town:

fly bird (26)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 9:51 pm
Reports that may be of interest -

"AIPAC to Congress :Authorize Action." 9/3/13
"N.Y. Times scraps AIPAC from Syria Story." 9/3/13

"U.S.Jewish Groups Call on Congress to Approve Use of Force against Syria's Assad."

"NYT Deletes This Paragraph in Which White House Says AIPAC is Key To War."
Sept 3,13

fly bird (26)
Wednesday September 4, 2013, 10:03 pm
wouldn't it be great, if it were possible, for the whole world to refuse to pay portions of their taxes, intended for military purposes...rhetorical question, alas.

Lately, I have thought of a song I sang as a child. I think it's called, "Where have all the flowers gone?" I don't know, who sang it - maybe Peter, Paul and Mary.


an A. (0)
Monday September 9, 2013, 6:14 am
Finally someone that understand

Let's all get rid of the private Zionist bankers. The FED, The city of London, The ECB, The IMF, The World Bank, and all commercial bank as well that charge interest over loans created out of thin air.
Only then the world can become a better place to live in

an A. (0)
Tuesday September 10, 2013, 3:54 pm

"In the Federal Reserve System the overheating or inflation is caused by design errors, which we will identify, and which have existed in the system since the Federal Reserve Act was approved by the Congress on December 23rd 1913.

The United States is now reaping the cumulative effect of that faulty design. On the other hand a properly designed monetary system is stable -- that is, self-correcting.

"The design errors in the Federal Reserve System are subtle but unmistakably identifiable and correctable by a simple act of Congress."

"most of our money and credit comes into existence as debt which must ultimately be repaid with interest to the private Federal Reserve and commercial banks. Thomas Jefferson had the key to the solution 200 years ago, and he expressed it this way:

If the American People ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers occupied.
The issuing power of money should be taken from the banks and restored to Congress and the people to whom it belongs, I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies.

"The subject of money is disposed of by the United States Constitution with extreme brevity:
Article 1, Section 8, Clause 5: The Congress shall have the coin Money (and) regulate the value thereof...'

"The framers of the Constitution understood the importance of delegating this Power to the Congress.

Benjamin Franklin on the 'Prime Cause of Revolutionary War'.
"The refusal of King George to allow the colonies to operate on an honest, colonial money system, which freed the ordinary man from the clutches of the manipulators, was probably the prime cause of the Revolution. If you do not exclude them from these United States, in this Constitution, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands.
I warn you gentlemen, if you do not exclude them (from Government) for all time, your children will curse you in your graves."

"In more modern times, Abraham Lincoln was the president who most clearly understood the importance of debt-free government financing and the imperative necessity for the government to spend money into circulation rather than to borrow it into circulation."

"The Government should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the Government and the buying power of consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of Government, hut it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the longfelt want for a uniform medium will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest.
The financing of all public enterprises, the maintenance of stable government and ordered progress, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity."

Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story

Loading Noted By...Please Wait


butterfly credits on the news network

  • credits for vetting a newly submitted story
  • credits for vetting any other story
  • credits for leaving a comment
learn more

Most Active Today in Business

Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of or its affiliates.

New to Care2? Start Here.