START A PETITION 25,136,189 members: the world's largest community for good
START A PETITION
x

New WTC Dust Study Looks Set to Confirm Nano-Thermite


Science & Tech  (tags: MarkBasile, 9/11 science, Millette 9/11, rethink 9/11, Nano-thermite 9/11, WTC Dust Study, 9/11 truth )

Debunker
- 354 days ago - 911grassroots.org
This new study is going to be a real game-changer because the replication is necessary to confirm controversial research conclusions in the world of science, so please donate at www.MarkBasile.org/donate.



Select names from your address book   |   Help
   

We hate spam. We do not sell or share the email addresses you provide.

Comments

Kit B. (276)
Friday September 27, 2013, 11:22 am

There are nearly a dozen different nano themites and most of them do leave a reddish dust, almost every one of them can or will be found after an explosion. Nano thermites are an inescapable residue after any explosion.
 

Debbie Williamson (267)
Friday September 27, 2013, 11:22 am
Noted and shared. Thank you, my friend.
 

Birgit W. (144)
Friday September 27, 2013, 11:51 am
Interesting article, thank you.
 

Kathleen R. (138)
Friday September 27, 2013, 2:24 pm
noted
 

David C. (25)
Friday September 27, 2013, 3:12 pm
> Nano thermites are an inescapable residue after any explosion.
this is utter nonsense

and there is nothing controversial about the residues (like iron microspheres) of and unreacted nano-ThermAte (e.g. as grey/red chips) found in WTC dust
- they are clearly described in Niels Harrits paper, explained in morffe detail in his talk at the Toronto hearings.

iron microspheres were described by others too

NIST didn't find anything, but NIST has admitted NOT HAVING SEARCHED for any incendiaries

recommended viewing & reading:

9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out on Colorado Public Television
and
The Toronto Hearings on 9/11 (Full DVD @utube:) -- Published on 8 Sep 2012 by WAHRHEITSBEWEGUNG911
Introduction
Niels Harrit @ The Toronto Hearings
Prof. Harrit is (main)author of ""Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe" published in The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, p.7-31.


Richard Gage (1.5 min)
R. Gage, licensed architect and founder of "Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth" sums it up, and the way he argues, it's becomming really, really obvious: 9/11 was an Inside Job a 'controlled demolition', and executed with leading-edge-technology at that.
Richard Gage's full (~1.5 h) presentation








 

Just Carole (338)
Friday September 27, 2013, 3:19 pm

Thanks for posting this discovery, Postmark.

Hopefully, it will not be ignored by the press and/or powers that be; and may illustrate the necessity for an independent study.

 

Debunker Buster (33)
Friday September 27, 2013, 3:22 pm
David,

Are you aware that Mark Basile, who is conducting this new study, is in 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out?
 

Debunker Buster (33)
Friday September 27, 2013, 3:30 pm
Also, I too think the findings are clear, but they have stirred up plenty of controversy and replication studies a must in the world of peer-reviewed science.
 

Debunker Buster (33)
Friday September 27, 2013, 3:41 pm
I meant to say replication studies are a must.

http://explorable.com/replication-study
 

Yvonne White (231)
Friday September 27, 2013, 3:50 pm
When the Government WON'T do its Job, somebody else HAS to! Since 9/11 was an Inside Job, of course the government Never looked for the Obvious use of explosives - sticking to that pitiful "jet fuel did it" story..jet fuel rarely blows up a whole jet, let alone 3 skyscrapers!
 

Just Carole (338)
Friday September 27, 2013, 4:02 pm

Yup, Yvonne (at least, reasonable people would see it that way).

 

Yvonne White (231)
Friday September 27, 2013, 4:52 pm
I've never been accused of being Reasonable, C!;) hehe..
 

Just Carole (338)
Friday September 27, 2013, 4:57 pm

Yeah, well I consider anyone who thinks the same way I do as "reasonable." (LOL)

 

Lyn Z. (294)
Friday September 27, 2013, 5:13 pm
Very good article. Thanks Postmark & Carole
 

Julian Robert Gonzalez (112)
Friday September 27, 2013, 10:00 pm
TY Just C for posting this. It is a long well known fact that nano thermite was found in the dust but many may not be as informed and ty for re exposing this. I saw some videos which gave me an idea but don't know how to implement.
The world court has warrants out for the arrest and trial for Bush and Chene for human rights violations and Obama asked Switzerland not to arrest Bush on a planned visit to Switzerland. Switzerland would not promise they that Bush would not be arrested. Trip cancelled. Cheney also did not travel to Canada for fear of being arrested.
Now if our government won't investigate 9-11 then maybe families of victims of 9-11 can add to the world court warrant to also investigate 9-11 for human rights violations may finally get the answers about 9-11.

http://youtu.be/D-AkfeQSlDw

http://youtu.be/jVlmY7nxI7U
 

Michael Carney (209)
Friday September 27, 2013, 11:00 pm
Well, how could anyone with any working brain cells trust or believe what the Government tells us? I think the last President who wasn't under the control, of the "Real Policy Makers" had half his head blown off...All Presidents since JFK have just been figure heads, and have no real power...Sadly9/11 was just part of the Passion Play, and I fear it's only gonna get worse, as more and more of our Rights and Civil Liberties get taken away...Those who make the rules and decide what happens also own the Media so they have no fear of being exposed...
 

Helen Porter (40)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 6:04 am
I read an article in Yahoo that said John McCain had been arrested for abetting the enemy. I could have laughed myself silly except I knew he was already out doing his dirty work in congress. Oh, my, I shouldn't talk that way about our power people. lol
 

Freya Harris (1)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 6:21 am
What a load of baloney. Those buildings collapsed solely because of the damage that the planes inflicted. I don't trust everything the gub-mint says, but engineers agree that no extra explosives were necessary to destroy the towers.
 

Kit B. (276)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 8:09 am

David C -- > Nano thermites are an inescapable residue after any explosion.
this is utter nonsense

No, David it's called chemistry. Simple high school chemistry.
 

Theodore Shayne (56)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 9:26 am
It's called chemistry indeed Kit and many engineers will tell you that a 707 which is primarily aluminum doesn't have the capacity to inflict the damage the government claims. Then again I try to keep an open mind. That's good science too. The truth will surface and our government wouldn't lie to us now would they? The CIA never experimented on citizens in the NY subway now did they? DDT is also harmless to humans?? LOL
 

Bryna Pizzo (139)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 11:26 am
Thank you for the fascinating article. I learned a great deal from the article and the comments. I'm sorry that I'm unable to donate to the effort. I hope the truth is exposed.
 

Kerrie G. (135)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 12:58 pm
Noted, thanks.
 

Jon Lessa (0)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 2:58 pm
This is a pretty good article, did not realize that the study by Millette was so weak and unpublished. Another study finding thermite in the dust would for sure open a lot of eyes.
 

Lois Jordan (55)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 3:55 pm
Noted w/thanks for posting, Postmark. Well, I'll definitely be looking forward to these results. I've been getting mailings from AE911 for quite awhile now.....since they came here with their excellent presentation. On 9/11 everyone was shocked by, first, the Twin Towers both being struck by airplanes...then both towers falling. I watched "live"....and never expected those towers to fall. Absolutely shocking; as was the fall of Building 7. Too many things happened too "coincidentally" that day---as well as prior events during the summer leading up to 9/11. And, let's not forget how long those buildings burned....for many weeks, I recall quite clearly.

I'm also hoping AE911 does more investigation of the Pentagon strike. There were no remnants of the wings, and neither was there any damage by the wings. The videos have all been confiscated and are unavailable of the Pentagon strike....which clearly indicates it was struck by some sort of missile. Many pilots have agreed with this "off the record." People wonder "then what happened to the plane that was supposed to have hit it?" The Atlantic is an enormous ocean. I sincerely hope that the public is finally given the truth about what happened that fateful day---we deserve nothing less.
 

Roger Garin-michaud (62)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 4:36 pm
noted, thanks
 

Deb E. (64)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 4:49 pm
They needed a "Pearl Harbor". I just hope that the truth comes out in time for the criminals ... aka Dick Cheney and gang ... to be prosecuted.
 

Debunker Buster (33)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 6:25 pm
"engineers agree that no extra explosives were necessary to destroy the towers."

The truth of the matter is:

Most architects and engineers have never been presented with the scientific evidence of controlled demolition. In addition, most of those who take the time to examine this evidence acknowledge that the official story canít be true. As of the date of this publication, there are almost 1,700 architects and engineers who openly support the findings of AE911Truth vs. only a few dozen who have openly supported the NIST WTC reports. Even so, in the end, the evidence stands on its own, regardless of how many professionals are aware of it. A more detailed answer is available here.

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/586-faq-9.html
 

Heidi Aubrey (5)
Saturday September 28, 2013, 10:25 pm
I suppose the facts that 2 jumbo jets blew up in them has nothing to do with it.
 

Jon Lessa (0)
Sunday September 29, 2013, 10:06 am
Heidi says " I suppose the facts that 2 jumbo jets blew up in them has nothing to do with it"

Thats the thing Heidi, the buildings were designed to withstand Boeing jet impacts, so the answer is "no". The third tower, building 7, also fell even though no plane crashed into it. It fell for 2.25 seconds in free fall, which means something completely removed about 100 feet of building that should have resisted the fall. The dust was full of signature thermite residue and a published study actually found microscopic remnants of nanothermite. This is why people like former NASA space director Dwain Deets have signed the ae911truth petition, along with over 2000 architects and engineers.
 

Lisa sick Windsor (154)
Sunday September 29, 2013, 12:39 pm
Noted, ty
 

Phyllis P. (416)
Thursday October 17, 2013, 8:28 am
Going to read this shortly. But there has been cover up all along. Nothing new, I just wished they would come to their senses and do something. Where is John Michael when you need him?? LOL
 

Phyllis P. (416)
Thursday October 17, 2013, 8:32 am
Silly me...I just see where he is the co-author of the article. Why wouldn't I have guessed??!! LOL
 

Debunker Buster (33)
Monday October 21, 2013, 10:58 am
whatreallyhappened.com has picked up on this article.

FLASHBACK - New WTC Dust Study Looks Set to Confirm Nano-thermite

http://whatreallyhappened.com/node/277513
 
Or, log in with your
Facebook account:
Please add your comment: (plain text only please. Allowable HTML: <a>)

Track Comments: Notify me with a personal message when other people comment on this story


Loading Noted By...Please Wait

 

 
Content and comments expressed here are the opinions of Care2 users and not necessarily that of Care2.com or its affiliates.